Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page AR-15 » AR-15 / M-16 Retro Forum
AR Sponsor: bravocompany
Site Notices
Posted: 9/23/2016 8:24:42 PM EDT
Found this no proof marks,front lug not rebated, had a primer like spray on coat, under coat is a purplish anodize looking finsh. Any ideas?


Link Posted: 9/23/2016 9:08:10 PM EDT
[#1]
It could be SFL solid film lubricant aka Sandstrom 9A which was an authorized touch up for worn finishes by unit level armorers, Direct Support and General Support Small Arms Repairman.

It's also available retail.

Link Posted: 9/23/2016 9:52:11 PM EDT
[#2]
That's a wierd combo of no forge codes, no proofs and no rebated lug.

Somebody smarter will be along in a moment to tell you what it is though.
Link Posted: 9/23/2016 11:32:10 PM EDT
[#3]
Does the front of the carry handle have a hole for the Gas tube? May be a 9mm upper
Link Posted: 9/24/2016 5:59:35 AM EDT
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Does the front of the carry handle have a hole for the Gas tube? May be a 9mm upper
View Quote

Not with a provision for a forward assist; all 9mm uppers are "slick-side".
Link Posted: 9/24/2016 10:11:53 AM EDT
[#5]
GM or H&R with the black anodizing and no proof stamps?
Link Posted: 9/24/2016 11:59:35 AM EDT
[#6]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
GM or H&R with the black anodizing and no proof stamps?
View Quote


I'm pretty sure GM rebated their front lugs. The three I have had in my possession have had rebated lugs. I'd like to see pictures of the front/rear of carry handle.
Link Posted: 9/24/2016 4:50:09 PM EDT
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


I'm pretty sure GM rebated their front lugs.
View Quote


Later GM ones didn't, just like the 70-71ish Colt uppers. My Gm upper isn't rebated.
Link Posted: 9/24/2016 4:57:07 PM EDT
[#8]

Link Posted: 9/24/2016 6:28:04 PM EDT
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Later GM ones didn't, just like the 70-71ish Colt uppers. My Gm upper isn't rebated.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:


I'm pretty sure GM rebated their front lugs.


Later GM ones didn't, just like the 70-71ish Colt uppers. My Gm upper isn't rebated.


I love learning new things.
Link Posted: 9/24/2016 9:01:30 PM EDT
[#10]
It's a round forge and not rebated, which rules out XM16E1. Maybe a 70s or 80s commercial upper? Any evidence that maybe the forge codes were ground off?
Link Posted: 9/25/2016 7:50:05 PM EDT
[#11]
Early bushmaster?
Link Posted: 9/25/2016 8:02:47 PM EDT
[#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Early bushmaster?
View Quote

I dont think bushmaster made A1 uppers, they did make c7 type.
Link Posted: 9/25/2016 8:22:58 PM EDT
[#13]
The X "hole" for the gas tube is done GM X style for sure. Colts are usually in the shape of a + sign or slightly off by a few degrees.
Link Posted: 9/26/2016 12:39:41 AM EDT
[#14]
It is common knowledge that factory "second" forgings ended up in the hands of other manufactures during the '70s and '80s, who finished the rejected products, to various levels of quality.  Some of these uppers are garbage (soft metal, poor anodization, sloppy fit and finish), despite how nice they look.  Flippers know this as well. these receivers pop up misrepresented for resale from time to time advertised as something that they are not.  




Link Posted: 9/26/2016 1:35:33 AM EDT
[#15]
I can't see what tool marks are on the front and back.  Can you describe them?  If your phone will not focus on the small part in the frame, you can surround the small thing you care about with other objects the same distance from the camera so the camera has no choice but to focus on the thing you care about.  (does that make sense?)  I believe only PM, LM, and some later commercial manufacturers milled the rear of the carry handle, some did the front too.  (Can anyone else chime in regarding this?)  The forge lines do look later, ~1970 or post "CK" forge upper receivers.  

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
<a href="http://s745.photobucket.com/user/sergio762/media/20160923_191933_zpslfza0s7j.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i745.photobucket.com/albums/xx96/sergio762/20160923_191933_zpslfza0s7j.jpg</a>
<a href="http://s745.photobucket.com/user/sergio762/media/20160923_191937_zpswznomcdx.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i745.photobucket.com/albums/xx96/sergio762/20160923_191937_zpswznomcdx.jpg</a>
View Quote

Link Posted: 9/26/2016 2:01:26 PM EDT
[#16]
Sgw (early olymic arms) xm15a1?
Link Posted: 9/26/2016 2:48:53 PM EDT
[#17]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Sgw (early olymic arms) xm15a1?
View Quote

Most of those were PM and the lugs were square not rounded like this one.
Page AR-15 » AR-15 / M-16 Retro Forum
AR Sponsor: bravocompany
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top