User Panel
Quoted: Is there a difference between the ert and lrt models they are offered in the same magnifications View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: http://www.leupold.com/hunting-shooting/scopes/mark-4-lrt-riflescopes/mark-4-lrt-8-5-25x50mm-30mm-m5-illum-ret/ Leupold part number 113092 It does NOT show a tick mark for illumination on the spreadsheet BUT it is listed as an Illuminated model. It uses the Tactical Milling Reticle...and I have to say...I love mine!!! Is there a difference between the ert and lrt models they are offered in the same magnifications Copied from another thread: The ER scopes are first focal plane or front focal plane. That means that the reticle gets bigger or smaller relative to the target size depending on the power setting. In doing this it keeps the mil spacing correct on any power so it has advantages in that you can range, use holds for wind or hold overs or holds to shoot movers on any power. With the standard second focal plane scopes ( LR/T) the mildots are only correct on one specific power as the reticle's size doesn't move but the image of the target does get bigger and smaller as you adjust the power setting. |
|
Quoted:
The farthest range I can find in kansas is 1k yards View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I still can't figure out a scope, leaning towards a vortex viper pst ffp 4-16 but it's not made in USA and that kinda bugs me. Any advice it's gotta be ffp and enough power to shoot long range. Ohh and american built My 30mm MK IV was just under 1400....love it!!! http://www.ar15.com/media/viewFile.html?i=62172 Would you recommend a 10 or 20 Moa mount for this scope or does flat work 20 MOA all the things. I have a Badger Ord mount on mine, and even in .260 it's not enough to reach a mile. The farthest range I can find in kansas is 1k yards You still would benefit from a sloped mount. Scopes work better near their mechanical zero (middle of the scope) so pretty much anything past 300 yards you're getting out of that area with a .308. |
|
Just got finished building this guy...
Mega Arms MATEN Megalithic upper/lower receiver set Rainer Arms Match Barrel 20" 1:10 twist Magpul UBR stock in grey JP Enterprises low mass chrome carrier and enhanced bolt JP enterprises muzzle brake Heavy buffers carbine buffer, spring and tube CMMG lower parts kit Geissele SSA-E trigger American defense mount Viper Vortex PST 2.5-10x32 glass The pics are with the ADM Recon mount but it was too tall so I'm exchanging it for the Recon SL which should be delivered in a few days. https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3918/14437575261_2a6926753f_b.jpg https://farm3.staticflickr.com/2927/14417801916_b1c322cff8_b.jpg https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3889/14439589842_91126c0ece_b.jpg |
|
Quoted: Just got finished building this guy... Mega Arms MATEN Megalithic upper/lower receiver set Rainer Arms Match Barrel 20" 1:10 twist Magpul UBR stock in grey JP Enterprises low mass chrome carrier and enhanced bolt JP enterprises muzzle brake Heavy buffers carbine buffer, spring and tube CMMG lower parts kit Geissele SSA-E trigger American defense mount Viper Vortex PST 2.5-10x32 glass The pics are with the ADM Recon mount but it was too tall so I'm exchanging it for the Recon SL which should be delivered in a few days. https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3918/14437575261_2a6926753f_b.jpg https://farm3.staticflickr.com/2927/14417801916_b1c322cff8_b.jpg https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3889/14439589842_91126c0ece_b.jpg View Quote |
|
I'm not a fan of the big muzzle brake, but the rest of the rifle is nice. I don't like the looks of the 2 port style brakes, but definitely can't argue against their effectiveness. Nice build, job well done!
|
|
Quoted:
I'm not a fan of the big muzzle brake, but the rest of the rifle is nice. I don't like the looks of the 2 port style brakes, but definitely can't argue against their effectiveness. Nice build, job well done! View Quote Agreed, it's a personal taste type of thing. Also it's one of the easiest parts to change out so I can rock a different style if wanted! |
|
Looks like they have a "Rifle Length" and "Extended Rifle Length" option for hand guards, but I don't see exact lengths for either. Any idea?
|
|
Quoted:
Looks like they have a "Rifle Length" and "Extended Rifle Length" option for hand guards, but I don't see exact lengths for either. Any idea? View Quote If you are talking about mega mkm receiver hand guards the rifle is 12" and extended is 14" I believe it is the same for the megalithic |
|
Quoted:
Surefire 7.62 would be sweet....and you don't have a huge diameter barrel so you don't have to make shoulder shield like i did. http://www.ar15.com/media/viewFile.html?i=62121 http://www.ar15.com/media/viewFile.html?i=62122 http://www.ar15.com/media/viewFile.html?i=63055 View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm not a fan of the big muzzle brake, but the rest of the rifle is nice. I don't like the looks of the 2 port style brakes, but definitely can't argue against their effectiveness. Nice build, job well done! Agreed, it's a personal taste type of thing. Also it's one of the easiest parts to change out so I can rock a different style if wanted! Surefire 7.62 would be sweet....and you don't have a huge diameter barrel so you don't have to make shoulder shield like i did. http://www.ar15.com/media/viewFile.html?i=62121 http://www.ar15.com/media/viewFile.html?i=62122 http://www.ar15.com/media/viewFile.html?i=63055 No go for gap making the collar. Looks like I am going to have to pay out the ass to have a machinist make it. |
|
Quoted:
No go for gap making the collar. Looks like I am going to have to pay out the ass to have a machinist make it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm not a fan of the big muzzle brake, but the rest of the rifle is nice. I don't like the looks of the 2 port style brakes, but definitely can't argue against their effectiveness. Nice build, job well done! Agreed, it's a personal taste type of thing. Also it's one of the easiest parts to change out so I can rock a different style if wanted! Surefire 7.62 would be sweet....and you don't have a huge diameter barrel so you don't have to make shoulder shield like i did. http://www.ar15.com/media/viewFile.html?i=62121 http://www.ar15.com/media/viewFile.html?i=62122 http://www.ar15.com/media/viewFile.html?i=63055 No go for gap making the collar. Looks like I am going to have to pay out the ass to have a machinist make it. Or just don't get one. |
|
Quoted: No go for gap making the collar. Looks like I am going to have to pay out the ass to have a machinist make it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: No go for gap making the collar. Looks like I am going to have to pay out the ass to have a machinist make it. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm not a fan of the big muzzle brake, but the rest of the rifle is nice. I don't like the looks of the 2 port style brakes, but definitely can't argue against their effectiveness. Nice build, job well done! Agreed, it's a personal taste type of thing. Also it's one of the easiest parts to change out so I can rock a different style if wanted! Surefire 7.62 would be sweet....and you don't have a huge diameter barrel so you don't have to make shoulder shield like i did. http://www.ar15.com/media/viewFile.html?i=62121 http://www.ar15.com/media/viewFile.html?i=62122 http://www.ar15.com/media/viewFile.html?i=63055 No go for gap making the collar. Looks like I am going to have to pay out the ass to have a machinist make it. Or just don't get one. It doesn't work like that. It NEEDS IT. It's just an look that I prefer. |
|
|
Quoted:
I agree. I think the collar is essential for protecting the geometry of the barrel shoulder. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
It doesn't work like that. It NEEDS IT. It's just an look that I prefer. Do yall shoot these things or look at them? |
|
Quoted: Do yall shoot these things or look at them? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: It doesn't work like that. It NEEDS IT. It's just an look that I prefer. Do yall shoot these things or look at them? ...but trust me when I tell you that a barrel is a lot softer than people think...I have no worries about scratches and gouges, they don't bug me at all...BUT the shoulder of the barrel is a critical feature. Not as critical as the muzzle...but critical. I protect that end of the gun at all costs...that's why I prefer muzzle breaks or FHs that fit across all dimensions. |
|
Quoted:
Shoot ...but trust me when I tell you that a barrel is a lot softer than people think...I have no worries about scratches and gouges, they don't bug me at all...BUT the shoulder of the barrel is a critical feature. Not as critical as the muzzle...but critical. I protect that end of the gun at all costs...that's why I prefer muzzle breaks or FHs that fit across all dimensions. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
It doesn't work like that. It NEEDS IT. It's just an look that I prefer. Do yall shoot these things or look at them? ...but trust me when I tell you that a barrel is a lot softer than people think...I have no worries about scratches and gouges, they don't bug me at all...BUT the shoulder of the barrel is a critical feature. Not as critical as the muzzle...but critical. I protect that end of the gun at all costs...that's why I prefer muzzle breaks or FHs that fit across all dimensions. Ya!! What he said |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: It doesn't work like that. It NEEDS IT. It's just an look that I prefer. Do yall shoot these things or look at them? ...but trust me when I tell you that a barrel is a lot softer than people think...I have no worries about scratches and gouges, they don't bug me at all...BUT the shoulder of the barrel is a critical feature. Not as critical as the muzzle...but critical. I protect that end of the gun at all costs...that's why I prefer muzzle breaks or FHs that fit across all dimensions. Ya!! What he said |
|
How much torque are you guys putting on your barrel nuts?
I put 65 ft-lbs on my JP 20" barrel and am having about 2" groups at 100 yards. JP suggested re-torqueing the barrel and possibly going a little higher. |
|
Quoted:
How much torque are you guys putting on your barrel nuts? I put 65 ft-lbs on my JP 20" barrel and am having about 2" groups at 100 yards. JP suggested re-torqueing the barrel and possibly going a little higher. View Quote I would also reccomend a fair amount of Loctite around the barrel extension inside the receiver. |
|
Quoted:
I would also reccomend a fair amount of Loctite around the barrel extension inside the receiver. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
How much torque are you guys putting on your barrel nuts? I put 65 ft-lbs on my JP 20" barrel and am having about 2" groups at 100 yards. JP suggested re-torqueing the barrel and possibly going a little higher. I would also reccomend a fair amount of Loctite around the barrel extension inside the receiver. I originally put anti seize compound on the barrel extension. Should I remove that and put Loctite 271 (red) on the extension? |
|
Quoted:
How much torque are you guys putting on your barrel nuts? I put 65 ft-lbs on my JP 20" barrel and am having about 2" groups at 100 yards. JP suggested re-torqueing the barrel and possibly going a little higher. View Quote If the shitty toque wrench I got from OReilly is correct, I put 80lbs on mine. The damn barrel nut would not line up, after trying 10 times to get it at 60lbs, I said screw it and torqued it til it lined up. Haven't done any real accuracy test, but is grouping about 5" at 50yds with irons. Zeroed the sights in at 25, and have been pretty consistent during break in. I'm only at 100rds or so, all got another 5 mags before consider it broken in. |
|
Quoted:
I originally put anti seize compound on the barrel extension. Should I remove that and put Loctite 271 (red) on the extension? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
How much torque are you guys putting on your barrel nuts? I put 65 ft-lbs on my JP 20" barrel and am having about 2" groups at 100 yards. JP suggested re-torqueing the barrel and possibly going a little higher. I would also reccomend a fair amount of Loctite around the barrel extension inside the receiver. I originally put anti seize compound on the barrel extension. Should I remove that and put Loctite 271 (red) on the extension? My guns seem to shoot better with the extension bedded in. All the guns I've worked on that have a reputation for accuracy, have an extremely close/interference fit on the receiver and extension. |
|
Quoted: How much torque are you guys putting on your barrel nuts? I put 65 ft-lbs on my JP 20" barrel and am having about 2" groups at 100 yards. JP suggested re-torqueing the barrel and possibly going a little higher. View Quote I wouldn't change anything just yet. My barrel nut is at about 55lbs. How tight did you torque your brake/fh? Those don't need to be so tight. Mines at about ten ft pounds with plenty of rockset. I shimmed it to about 15 to 20 degrees from TDC and then tightened it up. Didn't take a lot, like I said, but the rockset holds it plenty fine. By they way, if your barrel nut is plenty tight ( which it is ) and your FH isn't crazy tight, I suggest getting in a bit more shooting. With my 308 Mega and my 5.56 DSA build I had initial issues with interfacing with my optic correctly and that caused me plenty of issues. When I marked my stocks and did a lot more practice getting my optical alignment correct....my groups shrunk a LOT...and fast. My Mega, by the way, is a JP barrel....a fantastic shooter. I suggest you gather some more sessions at the range. Focus on technique. I mean, do make sure your scope mount and rings are tight, etc., etc., but once that is done....just shoot. More data will really help you out. I know one thing...you don't have a loose barrel. |
|
Quoted:
How much torque are you guys putting on your barrel nuts? I put 65 ft-lbs on my JP 20" barrel and am having about 2" groups at 100 yards. JP suggested re-torqueing the barrel and possibly going a little higher. View Quote What type of ammo? What type of rest? If this your first large frame AR? Barrel torque isn't the first thing I would look at when trying to diagnose accuracy problems. As stated, 65 ft/lbs should be plenty. Go over your equipment again, change ammo, read about proper shooting fundamentals, dry fire using those fundamentals, make sure the barrel is clean, dry fire, and try dry firing some also. |
|
View Quote |
|
Quoted: What type of ammo? What type of rest? If this your first large frame AR? Barrel torque isn't the first thing I would look at when trying to diagnose accuracy problems. As stated, 65 ft/lbs should be plenty. Go over your equipment again, change ammo, read about proper shooting fundamentals, dry fire using those fundamentals, make sure the barrel is clean, dry fire, and try dry firing some also. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: How much torque are you guys putting on your barrel nuts? I put 65 ft-lbs on my JP 20" barrel and am having about 2" groups at 100 yards. JP suggested re-torqueing the barrel and possibly going a little higher. What type of ammo? What type of rest? If this your first large frame AR? Barrel torque isn't the first thing I would look at when trying to diagnose accuracy problems. As stated, 65 ft/lbs should be plenty. Go over your equipment again, change ammo, read about proper shooting fundamentals, dry fire using those fundamentals, make sure the barrel is clean, dry fire, and try dry firing some also. My best guess is, assuming he's using good parts across the board: scope/eye interface. I am having the same issue but am slowly getting things dialed in. I had much better results today. I lengthened the pull, adjusted my cheek piece carefully and also added an MDT Anschutz style adjustable butt plate in order to get proper shoulder interface also. I've shrunk my group size by over 75 percent. I also brought the gun in to fifty yards so I can really focus on everything from my technology to my technique. I still have a lot to learn on AR-10s and scoped ARs in general; so I am taking my time and being really scientific. I make only one change at a time and I do a lot of dry practice before I go hot. I'm still having some alignment issues but it's getting better every session. My groups have gone from two inches to one inch and the ONLY reason they aren't one third inch is that I am still having some interface problems. I'll put two bullets in a single hole and then one a half inch or so out. I need to work on my sight picture more as I am still getting too good of a picture when my face has shifted. That being said, the repeatability has increased many fold. After working on consistency all morning, I went out to 300 yards and swept the field. BANG-DING-BANG-DING-BANG-DING, etc. |
|
Well I made it 10 whole pages in this thread before I broke down and ordered a ambi receiver set from Rainier . Now that I got that out of the way, I can continue through the rest of the pages for some ideas on the direction I want to head with this build!
|
|
Sounds familiar.
I don't owned a 308 yet and may follow suit and order an upper/lower set this summer and start a gradual and slow build. What did you get for upper/lower from Ranier? They anodized or nickel set? Question - is this DPMS bolt based or AR10 based? I like the Ambi set using std AR15 parts. |
|
I got the anodized set. From the research I've done so far you can use either dpms/sr 25 or ar10 bolt as long as the barrel extension matches.
|
|
|
JohnY516:
Thanks for the info. I guess it the barrel extension + bolt. I think I'll decide once I find a decent 20" SS barrel and base the bolt on the extension type. |
|
Quoted: Well I made it 10 whole pages in this thread before I broke down and ordered a ambi receiver set from Rainier . Now that I got that out of the way, I can continue through the rest of the pages for some ideas on the direction I want to head with this build! View Quote If you can't find it in this thread...I don't think it exists!!!!! |
|
Quoted:
What type of ammo? What type of rest? If this your first large frame AR? Barrel torque isn't the first thing I would look at when trying to diagnose accuracy problems. As stated, 65 ft/lbs should be plenty. Go over your equipment again, change ammo, read about proper shooting fundamentals, dry fire using those fundamentals, make sure the barrel is clean, dry fire, and try dry firing some also. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
How much torque are you guys putting on your barrel nuts? I put 65 ft-lbs on my JP 20" barrel and am having about 2" groups at 100 yards. JP suggested re-torqueing the barrel and possibly going a little higher. What type of ammo? What type of rest? If this your first large frame AR? Barrel torque isn't the first thing I would look at when trying to diagnose accuracy problems. As stated, 65 ft/lbs should be plenty. Go over your equipment again, change ammo, read about proper shooting fundamentals, dry fire using those fundamentals, make sure the barrel is clean, dry fire, and try dry firing some also. I have tried several different types of ammo. Winchester 168 gr. Match Winchester 150 gr Power Point Winchester 150 gr Power Point Plus Remington UMC 150 gr. PMC Bronze 147 gr. I know only one of those is high quality ammo, but some of the groups were up to 4" at 100 yards, with the smallest being 2". I figured they would be smaller than that. I am shooting using a Cabela's rest. It has a base with a rest for the front and rear of the rifle. I put a sandbag in the base to keep recoil to a minimum. I have a Vortex Viper 4-16 in a Larue Mount. The optic was mounted per Larue instructions, and the mount levers were adjusted to spec as well. I increased the torque to 85 ft lbs, cleaned the rife, and went back to the range. After getting frustrated with the results, I threw the mount and optic onto my Larue 18" 5.56 OBR and shot sub MOA right off the bat using 69 gr match ammo. Since I had good results with the second rifle, I am confident my shooting technique and setup are adequate. I also threw on a different optic with a mount that was not quick detach, but the results were the same. So, I have ruled out the possibility of an optic or mount issue. Twice, I have shot 3 shots that were touching, but the 4th and 5th were all over the place. I have about 200 rounds through the rifle so far. |
|
|
|
Quoted: The JP Medium brake that came with the barrel. I put some anti-seize on the threads and screwed it on. I torqued it with a dowel rod until the top was flat like JP instructs. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Point: what muzzle brake/FH are you using? The JP Medium brake that came with the barrel. I put some anti-seize on the threads and screwed it on. I torqued it with a dowel rod until the top was flat like JP instructs. Okay, cool...so that's not crazy torqued. Honestly, I think going to the top of spec in this instance was not really the best answer but obviously you didn't do any damage either. I just know that 85 pounds of torque on the receiver is a heck of a lot. Goodness, the bearing caps on my 4.0 Jeep are at 92 ft lbs and those are steel on steel. Anyway, I just hate running things like that to top of spec.... Man...I am so at a loss here. I, myself, am VERY new to the scoped AR game so my input as far as optical issues is minimal. You can see my post above that I am still struggling a bit with much simpler issues than yours. I SO HATE BEING STUMPED!!!! Okay...what trigger are you using again? and what weight..... |
|
Quoted: The JP Medium brake that came with the barrel. I put some anti-seize on the threads and screwed it on. I torqued it with a dowel rod until the top was flat like JP instructs. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Point: what muzzle brake/FH are you using? The JP Medium brake that came with the barrel. I put some anti-seize on the threads and screwed it on. I torqued it with a dowel rod until the top was flat like JP instructs. this is gonna sound stupid but here is what I think you should do next. Yank the brake, clean the muzzle, put on the thread protector if you have one and go shoot another set of groups...just a couple....you'll know in a heartbeat if that is or is not the problem. What I am good at is this: problem solving. The best approach to solving issues in a complex system is a scientific approach. Right now we only have theory SO our best bet is to ONLY change one thing at a time. Start with Occam's Razor...simple solutions are often the best solutions. I will be honest..I do NOT think it is the brake....BUT we MUST be scientific. Just shoot two or three groups. You'll know right away if that's the problem. |
|
This isn't rocket surgery. Tell jp you are not happy with the results. Chances are you got a Friday barrel reamer was worn who the hell knows. Rather than burning up additional ammo call them and say you want to send it in. It is highly unlikely anything aside from the barrel is causing it to preform at 4 moa.
|
|
Quoted:
Okay, cool...so that's not crazy torqued. Honestly, I think going to the top of spec in this instance was not really the best answer but obviously you didn't do any damage either. I just know that 85 pounds of torque on the receiver is a heck of a lot. Goodness, the bearing caps on my 4.0 Jeep are at 92 ft lbs and those are steel on steel. Anyway, I just hate running things like that to top of spec.... Man...I am so at a loss here. I, myself, am VERY new to the scoped AR game so my input as far as optical issues is minimal. You can see my post above that I am still struggling a bit with much simpler issues than yours. I SO HATE BEING STUMPED!!!! Okay...what trigger are you using again? and what weight..... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Point: what muzzle brake/FH are you using? The JP Medium brake that came with the barrel. I put some anti-seize on the threads and screwed it on. I torqued it with a dowel rod until the top was flat like JP instructs. Okay, cool...so that's not crazy torqued. Honestly, I think going to the top of spec in this instance was not really the best answer but obviously you didn't do any damage either. I just know that 85 pounds of torque on the receiver is a heck of a lot. Goodness, the bearing caps on my 4.0 Jeep are at 92 ft lbs and those are steel on steel. Anyway, I just hate running things like that to top of spec.... Man...I am so at a loss here. I, myself, am VERY new to the scoped AR game so my input as far as optical issues is minimal. You can see my post above that I am still struggling a bit with much simpler issues than yours. I SO HATE BEING STUMPED!!!! Okay...what trigger are you using again? and what weight..... The trigger is a Geissele SSA, which is the same great trigger Ithat did so well in my OBR. I think I have ruled out the following problems using the scientific approach Barrel not tight Mount not secure on rail Optic not tight in mount Ammo (I have only tried 147, 150, and 168 grain but come on...) Shooting technique ( I shot sub moa with an OBR) I will try removing the break and report back. |
|
Quoted:
This isn't rocket surgery. Tell jp you are not happy with the results. Chances are you got a Friday barrel reamer was worn who the hell knows. Rather than burning up additional ammo call them and say you want to send it in. It is highly unlikely anything aside from the barrel is causing it to preform at 4 moa. View Quote I called them and they said to: Re-torque barrel Clean barrel Try match 150 or 175 grain ammo Shoot with a mount that isn't quick detach I have done all of those and it didn't solve the problem. I will call on Monday. |
|
Quoted: I called them and they said to: Re-torque barrel Clean barrel Try match 150 or 175 grain ammo Shoot with a mount that isn't quick detach I have done all of those and it didn't solve the problem. I will call on Monday. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: This isn't rocket surgery. Tell jp you are not happy with the results. Chances are you got a Friday barrel reamer was worn who the hell knows. Rather than burning up additional ammo call them and say you want to send it in. It is highly unlikely anything aside from the barrel is causing it to preform at 4 moa. I called them and they said to: Re-torque barrel Clean barrel Try match 150 or 175 grain ammo Shoot with a mount that isn't quick detach I have done all of those and it didn't solve the problem. I will call on Monday. |
|
Quoted:
Barrel for my build came back today http://i1129.photobucket.com/albums/m504/Fozzy8/image_zps35017391.jpg View Quote About how many ounces was shed with the dimpling? Also who's gas block is that? |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.