User Panel
Posted: 3/4/2010 1:25:43 PM EDT
what are the main differences and similarities ,which would you buy if price was not an issue
|
|
I would buy the ACR if price wasnt an issue. since it is, i wont own either
|
|
Between those two? A SCAR. I would not buy an ACR on principle. unproven rifle with the wrong features at the wrong price, from a company with a rep most are 'iffy' on.
|
|
SCAR hand down!! Pick it up,hold it, and shoot it, and you'll see what I mean.
|
|
thanks for your reply
Quoted: Between those two? A SCAR. I would not buy an ACR on principle. unproven rifle with the wrong features at the wrong price, from a company with a rep most are 'iffy' on. |
|
No question about it.......SCAR. All you need to do is shoot one.
|
|
Quoted: i hope so because i am on a wait list for oneNo question about it.......SCAR. All you need to do is shoot one. |
|
Quoted:
what are the main differences and similarities ,which would you buy if price was not an issue To get the feature set that the SCAR comes standard with (folding stock, railed forearm), you'll need to get the ACR Enhanced model. I'd get a black SCAR-L, and plan on getting a black SCAR-H, if price were not an issue. The ACR was marketed as a $1500 rifle that serious people on a budget could afford. They need to be held to that standard. An ACR Basic with a $1500 retail price would be acceptable. Bushmaster can price the enhanced model at whatever lunatic price they want, as long as we can ignore them and go directly to Magpul for the folding stock. |
|
the one that has the NSN number the SCAR is a combat proven rifle the Acr is not end of story
|
|
My advice is to wait until the Remington ACR is finalized and in production for mil and leo.
At that point the Bushmaster ACR should be lighter weight and less expensive. Also you'll be able to judge just how dependable it is. Unless it comes down to a solid $2K or less than I would say go nuts. |
|
nice rifle i think ill be happy with the scar |
|
I knew I should have made it to the AAC shoot in 09. |
|
the scars a little cheeper and has a NSN
the ACR is a little more expensive and has a 1/9 twist barrel |
|
You can get the SCAR now or wait until the ACR comes out to handle both and get the SCAR then. The SCAR feels right when you pick it up and better when you shoot it.
|
|
I wonder, whats lighter? An ACR enhanced or your SCAR as kitted out in the pic? |
|
Quoted:
I wonder, whats lighter? An ACR enhanced or your SCAR as kitted out in the pic? I didn't notice any noticeable difference between the SBR ACR that I shot (below) and my SCAR http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jce-mPflDjo Forgive my horrific stance, it had been a long, rainy and muddy day |
|
In regards to the car, I just think the barrel sticking out so long looks bad. Its like a black iron rod that doesn't match the profile of the weapon. I would have to buy the 10.5" or whatever it is.
|
|
Quoted:
Between those two? A SCAR. I would not buy an ACR on principle. unproven rifle with the wrong features at the wrong price, from a company with a rep most are 'iffy' on. While you and I are in complete agreement, I'd like to hear just how "proven" the SCAR really is. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Between those two? A SCAR. I would not buy an ACR on principle. unproven rifle with the wrong features at the wrong price, from a company with a rep most are 'iffy' on. While you and I are in complete agreement, I'd like to hear just how "proven" the SCAR really is. |
|
Edit: it's bed time and I got no dog in this.
Could care less if both rifles disappeared today. |
|
I love my SCAR I was going to order a ACR but the fact that Magpul, Bushmaster and Remington could not get their shit together and make this rifle what it should have bee when it should have been led me to FN. I dont regret it one bit...
|
|
I want a 7.62x39 conversion kit that features a lower which will accept AK mags and drums.
Which ever rifle comes out with that first would be my choice. |
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
I want a 7.62x39 conversion kit that features a lower which will accept AK mags and drums. Which ever rifle comes out with that first would be my choice. http://i50.tinypic.com/24gvajo.jpg My AR-15 has them both beat by several years. I love that picture. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I want a 7.62x39 conversion kit that features a lower which will accept AK mags and drums. Which ever rifle comes out with that first would be my choice. http://i50.tinypic.com/24gvajo.jpg My AR-15 has them both beat by several years. I love that picture. I do have to come clean, it requires a tool for full modularity with everything pictured... A stock wrench. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Between those two? A SCAR. I would not buy an ACR on principle. unproven rifle with the wrong features at the wrong price, from a company with a rep most are 'iffy' on. While you and I are in complete agreement, I'd like to hear just how "proven" the SCAR really is. I also agree and would say that only time will tell. At this point the SCAR is (in my opinion) more properly proven than the other option given by the op. |
|
which one has an Nsn number again? hmm and which one hopes to some day have one theres a reason one of them doesnt
|
|
The only thing I think is good at the ACR is that it will drive the SCAR prices down a little. Thats what I'm waiting for.
|
|
Quoted:
Between those two? A SCAR. I would not buy an ACR on principle. unproven rifle with the wrong features at the wrong price, from a company with a rep most are 'iffy' on. Bushmaster is iffy? Your still way too noob. |
|
Being nobody here has an ACR, the responses are going to be a bit slanted. So far I only saw one response where a person was qualified to make a comparison between the two rifles because he actually shot both. The rest were speculative opinions at best. Too early for an accurate assesment of the ACR at this point.
|
|
I ordered an ACR yesterday so I'll have a comparison with my SCAR hopefully next week.
|
|
Looking forward to the report Ghetto. A side by side would be a good read. Lot's of pics. lol! Thanks
|
|
Quoted:
I ordered an ACR yesterday so I'll have a comparison with my SCAR hopefully next week. Thanks. Tag for follow up. |
|
I like the ACR much better...mainly because it doesn't have the reciprocating charging handle and lower profile.
Ran the SCAR at a local range doing some drills. I kept banging the reciprocating charging handle into walls and car doors causing several stovepipes. If this happens to me in DRILLS, I can't imagine what would happen when pieing a corner or operating CQB work. For some reason, I never had this problem with the AK platform, but I do with the SCAR. As for the lower profile, Scar has much more "height" over the ACR. However, this is purely a personal preference |
|
My range report http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&f=5&t=1021479&page=6
|
|
If SOCOM had done the SCAR competition today, would ACR have won over FNH's offering?
|
|
Quoted:
If SOCOM had done the SCAR competition today, would ACR have won over FNH's offering? |
|
Quoted:
If SOCOM had done the SCAR competition today, would ACR have won over FNH's offering? Based on current weight? No. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.