User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 1/22/2013 6:26:09 AM EDT
[#1]
For precision, variable all the way.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/22/2013 6:34:02 AM EDT
[#2]
the ACOG won't allow you to wring all the potential out of that barrel
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/22/2013 6:35:27 AM EDT
[#3]
I must differ with the cry's for variable as I use a TAO1NSN and have found that to be extremely capable to ranges exceeding the cartridges abilities.
Magnification alone doesn't improve precision nor the apparent accuracy of the rifle. This:  Shot this:  And this; Combined group shot at 300 and 400 yards:  So if your rifle like this rifle will hold it's rounds inside the crosshairs subtension, do you need more? |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/22/2013 6:46:11 AM EDT
[#4]
ACOGs aren't really considered precision optics i don't think.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/22/2013 6:49:19 AM EDT
[#5]
Quoted:
I must differ with the cry's for variable as I use a TAO1NSN and have found that to be extremely capable to ranges exceeding the cartridges abilities. Magnification alone doesn't improve precision nor the apparent accuracy of the rifle. This: Shot this: And this; Combined group shot at 300 and 400 yards: So if your rifle like this rifle will hold it's rounds inside the crosshairs subtension, do you need more? most folks can't group like that with a 4x eta: and no, it doesn't improve the accuracy of the rifle, but it makes it easier for the shooter to utilize it |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/22/2013 6:50:57 AM EDT
[#6]
Nor can most rifles, but money and time spent learning how is better than trying to buy performance that might not exist in the package you choose.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/22/2013 6:53:02 AM EDT
[#7]
while I love my TA01NSN I dont consider it a sniper scope.
it's serving me well on my DMR style rifle but for a SPR I would use something that offer more than 1/4 MOA adjustments |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/22/2013 6:55:29 AM EDT
[#8]
At distance, I find more magnification gives ME the edge. That does not mean it can't be done (as a previous post shows), but bring the target up 2x,3x,4x times closer and most will find an advantage. ACOGs are great battle optics (in the right hands), but give me more power for longer range.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/22/2013 7:04:30 AM EDT
[#9]
Both of my ACOG's have been replaced by a 1-4x and also a 2.5-10x. I'm a fan of variables.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/22/2013 7:06:27 AM EDT
[#10]
Both the first and second posts nail it.
The ACOG is a good 'general purpose' scope, but it's not designed for 'precision work'. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/22/2013 7:10:57 AM EDT
[#11]
As a long time hunter in wide open country, I feel there is no substitution for good optics and would choose a variable if accuracy and distance are what you are trying to achieve. If you want to also be able to perform close quarter shots then some Rapid Transition Sights might be a good addition.
My .02 |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/22/2013 7:37:49 AM EDT
[#12]
Quoted: Magnification alone doesn't improve precision nor the apparent accuracy of the rifle.  .A scope can be doped for the range and will be more precise where as a acog relys on the gun ammo combo matching the reticle. So yes accuracy wont change, but precision of the shot will. A scope will always out do a acog in this facet. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/22/2013 8:02:39 AM EDT
[#13]
I think the ACOG is a great optic, but for me they are not flexible enough.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/22/2013 8:16:30 AM EDT
[#14]
I would go with a variable scope if it was my rifle.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/22/2013 9:41:43 AM EDT
[#15]
I just exploded my mouse clicking on the variable power voting option. There certainly is nothing wrong with ACOGs, but why limit your rifles capabilities(especially on a precision build)? The variable power is much more versatile. Can anyone name a single advantage an ACOG would have over a solid variable optic? I could possibly see a weight/durability argument... but its a precision rifle, be nice to her and don't sweat however many minuscule ounces separate the two while she rests on a bipod.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/22/2013 11:29:00 AM EDT
[#16]
Topic Moved
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/22/2013 11:31:26 AM EDT
[#17]
Quoted: quicker shots, quicker range estimation.
Can anyone name a single advantage an ACOG would have over a solid variable optic? |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2013 9:50:49 AM EDT
[#18]
Quoted:
the ACOG won't allow you to wring all the potential out of that barrel This is true. The ACOG is a quick and "good enough" solution. The variable will offer more downrange potential. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/23/2013 9:58:38 AM EDT
[#19]
Quoted:
Nor can most rifles, but money and time spent learning how is better than trying to buy performance that might not exist in the package you choose. Shooting groups in a canned environment is one thing, adjusting for intermediate ranges, windage and atmospherics at extended ranges with precision is another. In this sense, shooting 400 yards KD is a chip shot. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
