All of the TA31s and TA11s I have ever owned display the cracking in the tube, some bubbling and a little bit of ooze. This does not mean they all possessed every condition mentioned, but at least one.
This is my take on why the ACOG with BAC (compacts, TA31, TA11 and TA55) develop this condition.
The fiber optic receptor is housed in a hard polymer casing that is filled with the alien goo (has Trijicon ever given it a name?). In direct sunlight (or house in areas with higher temps) the goo will heat up, as liquids do, and expand. There is only an infinite amount of space available in the polymer housing for the goo to expand. As the goo expands the pressure build and two things happen: 1) the goo find a means to exit the tube (leak) or 2) the polymer housing expands to accommodate the pressure and cracks. Very similar to expansion cracks that occur on frozen lakes and ponds. The bubbles are a result of the goo leaking and a gas fills the void.
Design flaw or functionality trade off? I have taken the word of Trijicon as this condition does not affect the function of the ACOG, but now I question to what extent? If the polymer housing is so badly cracked, wouldn't that hinder the ability of the fiber optic receptor to collect light? The cracks act like hills and valley which can deflect light. Furthermore, the cracked areas have more of a opaque appearance which can hinder light transmission. If half or all of the goo that the fiber optic receptor is encase in oozes out, now the stability is in question.
That said, I still do not have any intentions on sending any of mine back. As of now, their function has been flawless. Until I start glowing in the dark....may be. Hmm......sure would make it easier to pee at night without turning the lights on.