User Panel
Posted: 4/16/2011 7:22:48 AM EDT
A recent thread about the Judge created a lot of debate on AR15.com, as it often does.
A friend of the Box O’ Truth had asked me if the Judge would be good to use when hiking “in case of a bear attack”. I advised him that there were much better choices for bear. And that is the danger of over-hyping a firearm system. Those that are not trained in terminal ballistics might make a poor decision about a weapon system because of misleading information. The first Judge I tested was a 2 ½ inch model and some folks criticized me and said it would have performed better if I had a 3 inch model. They also said that since I had cut down a 3 inch buckshot load to 2 ½ inches, it spoiled the test. They also said that some of the new ammo designed for the Judge would work “a lot better”. My friend ArmedSuspect contacted me and said, “I am an FFL and have a gun shop. I am willing to acquire a 3 inch Judge to test some of the new “Personal Defense” ammunition that is being marketed, if you are willing to do some tests.” How could I refuse? ArmedSuspect is a very knowledgeable regarding firearms and owns a gun shop called Ashby Arms in Harrisonburg, VA. His website is http://www.ashbyarms.com/. He sent a 3 inch Judge to my FFL and included various samples of “better” ammunition. Here’s what he sent. First the 3” Judge. As someone said, “It looks like a fat girl all dressed up for the prom.” I have it next to a Glock 19, 9mm pistol. Notice the size comparison. The Judge is a big pistol. Now make no mistake……..I like Taurus firearms. I have owned several (never a Judge) and they all worked well and were well-built. This Judge is not “pretty” to me, but it is well-built and looks like a quality product. I am not “against” the Judge. I just want to find out if it will meet self-defense standards with .410 shotgun ammunition. The ribbed grips on the Judge were very comfortable and really tamed the recoil on this pistol. It also had a nice high-visibility front sight that worked well. Here’s the ammo that ArmedSuspect sent. First is some Winchester 3 inch 000 Buckshot (5 pellets). Next, some Winchester Supreme Elite, PDX1, 2 ½ inch Ammunition for Personal Defense, 12 plated BBs, and 3 plated Cylinder Projectiles. Then some Federal Premium, .410 Handgun, 3 inch Buckshot, 9 pellets of #4 Buck, with a listed velocity of 1100 fps. Then some Remington HD Ultimate Home Defense, 2 ½ inch 00 Buckshot, 4 pellets, 1,300 fps. And lastly, some Winchester 3 inch ¼ oz. Hollow Point Rifled Slug, 1,800 fps velocity. Now, before we start shooting, let me be clear. All of this ammo looks like high quality ammunition. All of these manufacturers make high quality ammunition. It is well made and would probably do fairly well out of a longer shotgun barrel. (We may try that and see.) But the Judge has a 3 inch barrel, and that’s not very long to build velocity. Will it develop enough velocity to be effective in this short barrel? Let’s see how well it performs. We will be shooting it into the Waterbox O’ Truth and into water jugs, with 4 layers of denim in front. To make the FBI 12 inch penetration standard, it will need to fully penetrate through 4 water jugs, for 24 inches of water. That’s a long way. People often ask, “Why is the penetration standard 12 inches? Most people are not 12 inches “thick”.” The answer is that the FBI did a study of what was needed for ammunition to be effective, based upon the ammunition failure in the famous Miami Shootout, to reach the vital organs of the bad guy and Stop him from doing what he was doing. They determined that to be sure to reach the vital organs or central nervous system, a round should penetrate from 12 to 15 inches into ballistics gelatin. This included penetration through 4 layers of denim material to account for thick clothing, and also to account for the possibility of the round needing to penetrate through arms or limbs before hitting the torso. If you think about it, if a bad guy is pointing a gun at you, your round might need to fully penetrate his hands or arms before even starting to penetrate his torso. The 12 inch minimum standard allows for effectiveness from any angle and through any extremities. Therefore, we require any self-defense round to meet or exceed the FBI 12 inch minimum penetration standard. And since water works at a 2 to 1 ratio to ballistic gelatin, a round must penetrate 24 inches of water (4 jugs) to meet the standard of 12 inches of BG. First, a round of the Winchester 000 Buck. I got wet. The 5 000 buck penetrated into the 4th jug, for 9 to 12 inches penetration. Notice how they were flattened as they went down the barrel. Next, the Winchester Supreme Elite PDX1 ammo. There were bbs in the 1st and 2nd jugs, and the discs were in the 2nd and 3rd jug, for a maximum penetration of 6 to 9 inches. We then tried the Federal 3 inch #4 buck. It left the wad in the denim. These pellets made it into the 3rd jug, for a maximum penetration of 6 to 9 inches. However, some of the pellets left the water jugs and were found in the bottom of the Waterbox. Then the Remington Home Defense 2 ½ inch 00 buck. There was one pellet in the 2nd jug, 3 pellets in the 3rd jug, and 1 pellet even entered the 5th jug, for a maximum penetration of 12 to 15 inches. Notice how they were flattened. Lastly, we tried two rounds of the 3 inch slug. One made 3 jugs and one made 4 jugs, for a maximum penetration of 12 inches. Then we tried the 000 buck out of a 28 inch .410 shotgun, just to see what the longer barrel would do. I got wet some more. The 000 pellets made it into the 5th jug, for 12 to 15 inches maximum penetration. Made some difference after all. We also tried the PDX1 rounds in the shotgun and the BBs were in the 3rd and 4th jugs, with the discs making it into the 5th jug. Pretty impressive difference. We then set up a target at 7 yards and shot it with some #6 birdshot. Notice that the shot pattern was all the way from the bottom to the top, meaning that a lot of pellets missed the target. A short barrel, that is rifled, will really shoot a wide pattern, which, contrary to what some might think, is really bad. You are responsible for all those pellets that missed the target. We then tried the #4 buck load. Notice the recoil. The load had 9 pellets, but we only found 7 holes. That means 2 pellets missed the target all together. Lastly, we shot the PDX1 load at the target. It looked like two of the discs went into the same hole, but we only counted 9 of the BBs, which means that 3 of them missed the target. Lessons Learned: 1. The 3 inch .410 shells did slightly better than the 2 ½ inch shells did. But most of them still failed to make the 12 inch minimum penetration standard. However, a few loads made the minimum penetration standard. 2. Some of the pellets deviated sharply from their path and left the water jugs. 3. The longer barrel of the 28 inch shotgun made quite a difference in penetration. It seems that the short 3 inch barrel of the Judge is its main limitation. 4. Even at 7 yards, the pattern of the Judge is too wide, and will cause some of the load to miss a bad guy. Not only are you responsible for every pellet you send down range, but if they miss him, they do not Stop him. 5. The sun was shining, it was a blue bird day, and it was better than any day I ever spent at work. 6. It’s fun to shoot stuff. Many thanks to ArmedSuspect and Ashby Arms in Harrisonburg, VA, for supplying the Judge and ammo for this test. And thanks to Vern and Bill for the help hauling all that water. |
|
Good post.
what was the penetration of .45LC in your last test? I don't remember. |
|
Outstanding! Thank you! Great test.
Yet again you have shown the truth. Thank you. |
|
Interesting, and validated what I was suspecting was going to happen. Excellent job!!
|
|
Quoted:
Good post. what was the penetration of .45LC in your last test? I don't remember. It made 5 jugs, or 15 inches maximum penetration. |
|
I'm thinking that it would not be very effective against a bear.
|
|
Yup, great info.
Thanks for doing the test and posting the results. |
|
Seems like with the right ammunition, it becomes less awful, to the point of even being on the low end of decent. Perhaps even ok in its advertised role, anti-carjacking gun. I'd rather take any modern semi-automatic handgun in its place, but it seems like at the close distances of a car, that would do the trick.
|
|
Quoted:
I'm thinking that it would not be very effective against a bear. I'm thinking that you are correct. |
|
Quoted:
1. The 3 inch .410 shells did slightly better than the 2 ½ inch shells did. But most of them still failed to make the 12 inch minimum penetration standard. However, a few loads made the minimum penetration standard. Any thoughts on the fluid dynamics differences between water and gelatin? I would think that water would induce more drag than gelatin (and living tissue), and that it would be harder to penetrate 12 inches of water than 12 inches of gelatin. Edited to add: this question should not be construed as a defense of the Judge as a self-defense / bear attack round. It's just a random thought I got while reading. |
|
Quoted:
Seems like with the right ammunition, it becomes less awful, to the point of even being on the low end of decent. Perhaps even ok in its advertised role, anti-carjacking gun. I'd rather take any modern semi-automatic handgun in its place, but it seems like at the close distances of a car, that would do the trick. A fair summation. No one is saying that a Judge loaded with some of these loads is "worthless". But there are better personal defense systems available. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
1. The 3 inch .410 shells did slightly better than the 2 ½ inch shells did. But most of them still failed to make the 12 inch minimum penetration standard. However, a few loads made the minimum penetration standard. Any thoughts on the fluid dynamics differences between water and gelatin? I would think that water would induce more drag than gelatin (and living tissue), and that it would be harder to penetrate 12 inches of water than 12 inches of gelatin. Edited to add: this question should not be construed as a defense of the Judge as a self-defense / bear attack round. It's just a random thought I got while reading. Water works at a 2 to 1 ratio to ballistics gelatin. Therefore, 24 inches of water equals approximately 12 inches of ballistics gelatin. |
|
Very interesting, thank you for taking all that time to test and post this. That's a lot of water jugs.
I expected the slug to do a little better. |
|
That's pretty awesome.
Are those Ed Hardy jeans that you have in front of the tank setup? |
|
well It seems its not the total POS that this site makes it out to be
Just a poor subsitute that you could have spent the same amount of money and get a really decent self defense weapon. While I wouldn't want to get shot at with one, but I wouldn't want to defend myself with one. |
|
you say:
"The 5 000 buck penetrated into the 4th jug, for 9 to 12 inches penetration. Notice how they were flattened as they went down the barrel. " How do you know they flattened as they went down the barrel and that didn't happen as it went through the water? |
|
Excellent. Thanks to you and ArmedSuspect for the test.
So in summary, we have a well made pistol, using the best ammo currently available, that is marginal at best, and inadequate at anything over a few yards. |
|
Interesting. It's still a poor choice for defence but it doesn't suck quite as much as I thought it would.
|
|
Awesome, my brother and I were having this exact debate last weekend. Now he wants to skeet shoot with a judge.
|
|
Thanks again, Old_Painless! You once again prove yourself to be an outstanding, educational source of reason.
Now I have to show this to my dad, who for some unknown reason, is totally infatuated with the idea of buying a Judge, when I just bought him a Glock last year... -Parke1 |
|
Awesome, my brother and I were having this exact debate last weekend. Now he wants to skeet shoot with a judge.
|
|
Quoted:
So , in the end birdshot is for birds? It also works well for skeet. |
|
These threads are great. I dare you to find a more prolific contributor of valuable firearm knowledge to this forum. Great info O_P. Thank you for your time and effort. (I say this knowing damn well you were having a load of fun anyway ) |
|
Quoted:
you say: "The 5 000 buck penetrated into the 4th jug, for 9 to 12 inches penetration. Notice how they were flattened as they went down the barrel. " How do you know they flattened as they went down the barrel and that didn't happen as it went through the water? Notice the next picture, where you can see the dents on one of the discs from the BBs behind it. Water does not flatten out the buckshot, but they mash each other flat as they go down the barrel. You can take these buckshot, and stack them and actually figure out what order they went down the barrel from the dents made from one to the next. |
|
Since the rifle did affect the penetration, do you have any idea how long of a barrel on a judge would be required to achieve similar results? Assuming some of these were available, would a 5" or 7" barrel judge possibly do the trick or do you need a full length shotgun barrel?
|
|
Thanks for the update OP.
I'm sure there are a lot of Judge owners saying "I told you so!" even though there isn't all that much to celebrate there IMO.
|
|
Quoted:
Since the rifle did affect the penetration, do you have any idea how long of a barrel on a judge would be required to achieve similar results? Assuming some of these were available, would a 5" or 7" barrel judge possibly do the trick or do you need a full length shotgun barrel? As my favorite author, Mark Twain once said, "I was gratified to be able to give an immediate answer. I said, "I don't know."" I have no idea. |
|
Quoted:
Excellent. Thanks to you and ArmedSuspect for the test. So in summary, we have a well made pistol, using the best ammo currently available, that is marginal at best, and inadequate at anything over a few yards. It seems to be something akin to a ballistic knife. Potentially devastating...but only if used at contact distance. |
|
My question is this?
Is four to five 9-12" holes > than or < than one 12-15" hole? 5 trigger pulls resulting in 20 or so holes seems like a lot of ventilation to me. |
|
Quoted:
Thanks for the update OP. I'm sure there are a lot of Judge owners saying "I told you so!" even though there isn't all that much to celebrate there IMO. I agree. The 3 inch model did slightly better. But most of the rounds fired still failed to make the minimum penetration standard. And the shot spread that caused errant pellets is no small issue. We are responsible for every projectile that goes down range. As Clint Smith notes, "Every round that goes down range has a lawyer tied to it." |
|
Quoted:
My question is this? Is four to five 9-12" holes > than or < than one 12-15" hole? It depends on where they hit and what vital organs they damage. 5 trigger pulls resulting in 20 or so holes seems like a lot of ventilation to me.
But what if, after the first trigger pull, the bad guy is not Stopped, and he proceeds to shoot you through the head? The other 4 rounds in your gun won't help you much then. We cannot depend on getting all our shots off, nor can we depend on what the bad guy will do. Therefore, we want our first round to be effective and damage vital organs or the CNS, and the best way to assure that is to have at least 12 inches of penetration. |
|
Nice work as always O_P!
My one observation: Ballistic gelatin doesn't have plastic partitions every 8 inches or so; I think the penetration compared to gelatin may be a bit farther than the estimate, since the rounds aren't going through just water. How much difference does it make? I don't know, but you could test it! Cut up some jugs into "flat" sheets, stack the sheets, and see how far a well documented (in gelatin) round penetrates! |
|
Quoted: Quoted: I'm thinking that it would not be very effective against a bear. I'm thinking that you are correct. Human-it's what's for dinner. |
|
Quoted:
That is a big spread for such a short distance. Yes it is. More than I expected, to be honest. I guess it is a result of a very short and rifled barrel. In past tests, rifling in shotgun barrels resulted in a much larger pattern. |
|
I love how at 7 yards, you're not even getting all the pellets onto the target.
You need a column in Guns & Ammo or similar magazine, to spread some much-needed truth around the larger shooting community. |
|
Quoted:
Nice work as always O_P! My one observation: Ballistic gelatin doesn't have plastic partitions every 8 inches or so; I think the penetration compared to gelatin may be a bit farther than the estimate, since the rounds aren't going through just water. How much difference does it make? You bring up a valid point. I had a nice conversation with Dr. Roberts, the true "Expert" on terminal ballistics. We discussed, and agreed, that if my results were very different from his ballistics gelatin tests, it would show mine were in error. However, time and time again, my results show up at exactly the same penetration as his BG tests do, at a 2 to 1 ratio. (That is, 24 inches of water equal 12 inches of penetration in BG.) We agreed that it validates my "poor boy" tests as a very good approximation of what he gets. Of course, for more accurate tests, his lab tests with properly calibrated and refrigerated ballistics gelatin are the best available. But mine are "pretty close" and are a fair approximation. |
|
Thanks for verifying what common sense determined a long time ago:
A .410 shotgun with a 3" barrel might work at point blank range. Otherwise....not so much. |
|
Quoted:
So , in the end birdshot is for birds? and a .410 is still only good for birds and snakes. |
|
I might have missed it, but is the Judge barrel rifled or smooth? I would expect better patterns if smooth-
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.