User Panel
Fail.
Limpwristing is the standard Glock excuse, which in reality is more likely to happen with a Glock than a 1911. |
|
6 1911's and countless rds downrange and I have yet to experience this "limpwristing" thing
I did have a ruger p series .45 acp that didnt fire worth a shit if you didn't have it locked in a vise like grip every time |
|
1. My Glock 27 has yet to kaboom in my hand after umpteen thousands of rounds fired. 2. My Springfield USGI 1911A1 is 106% trouble-free and reliable. |
|
If a picture is worth a thousand words, what's a red X worth?
|
|
There's at least six 1911's in my safe including two that retail in the $2500+ range.
There's a Glock 23 in my pocket right now. |
|
I have never had the type of issues you discribe.
I slapped one together out of parts laying around the garage and after an extractor change it worked just fine. Of course the casing hits you in the head but hell I only have about $100.00 in it. Don't be hatin yo. |
|
|
Out of two 1911's I have owned, only my GI Colt built in 1918 has never malfunctioned.
The other was a Kimber Custom II. POS never would run worth a shit, so I sold it. The only malfunction I have had with my Glock 17 was due to a round of Wolf ammo that did not fully cycle the weapon. My next automatic pistol will be either a G21 or a G20. |
|
In 100 years no one will remember Glock, and people will still be using 1911's for warfighting. |
|
Quoted: If a picture is worth a thousand words, what's a red X worth? 18 cents. 1911 owner here. Both my 1911's ran 100% out of the box, except for with one magazine. Now that the mag is gone I have yet to have an issue. |
|
Funny, I've had several 1911's with none of those experiences.
|
|
I own Glocks and 1911s. I laughed.
You people need to lighten up. |
|
[Former Glock Owner] here.
You can keep the god-aweful trigger, Tapco accessories and "for the ladies" ergonomics. With that said, there are plenty of manufacturers willing and able to rip off JMB's design for a quick buck. Similarly to so many of the polymer-based pistols out there, many of them do not get it right. It has nothing to do with the design (or the originials) and everything to do with the new(er) companies trying to replicate and sell their variants. You don't blame Gaston's design for failures using Korean-made magazines (or ProMag, god forfbid) - same here. |
|
I have to say, i've seen limpwristing. I have a 1911 that fires flawlessly (and didn't require 500 rounds or break in to do so) anytime i'm shooting it. I can hand it to a friend of mine, and it will misfeed every time it loads the next round. He'll struggle his way through half a mag, and i'll take it back and fire through the rest with zero problems. This has been consistent, and I can't think of anything that would cause the problem aside from him not holding the pistol correctly.
|
|
Quoted: In 100 years no one will remember Glock, and people will still be using 1911's for warfighting. |
|
Quoted:
In 100 years no one will remember Glock, and people will still be using 1911's for warfighting. This heap o' truth is simply insurmountable. |
|
i own both. glock29 on the hip right now. but my RIA 1911 tactical has been 100% reliable. i wear it when i want to feel sexy
Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
Quoted:
In 100 years no one will remember Glock, and people will still be using 1911's for warfighting. warfighting? sidearms are probably among the least important factor in "warfighting". |
|
Quoted:
Uh, I don't think I've ever heard anyone say that 1911's suffer from "limp wristing." That is always a problem attributed to Glocks. For example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsewsolPyBU&feature=PlayList&p=74B5F43E017943CF&playnext_from=PL&playnext=1&index=18 Yup. Of course, my 1911s have never suffered from failures to feed, fire or otherwise function either. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
In 100 years no one will remember Glock, and people will still be using 1911's for warfighting. This heap o' truth is simply insurmountable. What about the 14TH gen glocks? |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
In 100 years no one will remember Glock, and people will still be using 1911's for warfighting. This heap o' truth is simply insurmountable. It's hard for the fanbois to get that... I have both. I've yet to have a malfunction in any of them that wasn't mag/ammo related. Quite frankly all this fanboi bullshit is getting tiring |
|
Quoted:
In 100 years no one will remember Glock, and people will still be using 1911's for warfighting. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
I own and carry a G19 every day.
I love 1911's though but they seem like overkill to me and thats a big gun to carry everyday. Even the glock I have is big for carry, thinking about switching to a kel-tec. I think the 1911 is a great combat (offensive) weapon, if i was going to war I would have one as a sidearm. 9mm is all i need for defense.
|
|
Quoted:
In 100 years no one will remember Glock, and people will still be using 1911's for warfighting. Hopefully in that 100 years, there will be a cure for idiocy. |
|
The Colt in the avatar has 97,000,000 rounds through it. No problems. Pure love. Recently bought my first plastic weapon, a XDm in 9mm. Great fun to shoot, no problems and it makes me happy.
|
|
Y'know.....for all the people saying "OMG MY 1911 is UNRELIABLE"......mine's always run 100% outta the box, with the exception of one round that was in the magazine weird due to operator error .
Many of the complaints I've seen on 1911s come from people who buy shit and expect it to be a Nighthawk Custom, don't maintain their firearm and expect it to hold up like the USS Missouri, use the absolute bottom-of-the-box ammo because they save twenty cents per box, don't train or practice with their firearms and expect to fire pinpoint lazers from their asses, and who think "concealed means concealed" is represented by the latest, whole-ammo-box-holding, thick plastic fantastic making such a print on them that it looks like they have a bizarre tumor. Granted, different strokes for different folks, but I have yet to find a 1911 that wouldn't work right outta the box, unless the owner tried to monkey with it themselves to fix a problem that wasn't there to begin with. I also have yet to find a Glock whose grip was designed with us "mere humans" in mind. |
|
Eh, I had a 1911 that would jam on quite a few hollowpoints, but ran fine on FMJs.
Now I have a FNP and it goes bang EVERY TIME regardless of what I feed it! |
|
Well, try 600 rds of handloads through your Glock
Somewhere along the way you'll be calling me |
|
Quoted: In 100 years no one will remember the Glock 17, and people will still be using Glock 87's for warfighting. I really like my 1911, but honestly this revised prediction is more likely to come true. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
In 100 years no one will remember Glock, and people will still be using 1911's for warfighting. This heap o' truth is simply insurmountable. What about the 14TH gen glocks? 14 generations of self-labeled perfection? |
|
Quoted:
Well, try 600 rds of handloads through your Glock Somewhere along the way you'll be calling me Would this be before, or after the Glock explodes? |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.