User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 6/22/2015 1:47:51 PM EDT
[#1]
After about 500 rounds through my new PST 2.5-10 FFP I noticed "bubbles" on the reticle. Looks like little water/oil droplets. I would say there are about half a dozen. Not impressed.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2015 11:08:44 PM EDT
[#2]
That's a good, solid optic. It'll do just fine during that course.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/23/2015 5:18:49 PM EDT
[#3]
I have both the 2.5-10x44 SFP MRAD and the 2.5-10x32 FFP MRAD, no problems with either so far after at least 5 years with the SFP and 1 year with the FFP.
Also have the 5-15x44 Viper HST, no problems at all riding a .260 Rem gasser AR10. Started with the Viper 6.5-20x44 Mil Dot, no problems dating back for 6 years now. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/28/2015 11:12:21 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I have both the 2.5-10x44 SFP MRAD and the 2.5-10x32 FFP MRAD, no problems with either so far after at least 5 years with the SFP and 1 year with the FFP. Also have the 5-15x44 Viper HST, no problems at all riding a .260 Rem gasser AR10. Started with the Viper 6.5-20x44 Mil Dot, no problems dating back for 6 years now. Do you have reference between the two 2.5-10x models? I have the 2.5-10x44 SFP and have considered upgrading to the 2.5-10x32 model to shed some weight. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/8/2015 2:30:06 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Do you have reference between the two 2.5-10x models? I have the 2.5-10x44 SFP and have considered upgrading to the 2.5-10x32 model to shed some weight. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I have both the 2.5-10x44 SFP MRAD and the 2.5-10x32 FFP MRAD, no problems with either so far after at least 5 years with the SFP and 1 year with the FFP. Also have the 5-15x44 Viper HST, no problems at all riding a .260 Rem gasser AR10. Started with the Viper 6.5-20x44 Mil Dot, no problems dating back for 6 years now. Do you have reference between the two 2.5-10x models? I have the 2.5-10x44 SFP and have considered upgrading to the 2.5-10x32 model to shed some weight. I like the weight of the x32 model, but it's a bit longer. FOV is the same on both of them. Sniper Magazine has an excellent article on the internals of these, showing optical elements, efficient use of materials, what objective sizes make sense for the power, things like that. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/13/2015 2:37:18 PM EDT
[#6]
We have a x32 model on a .223 bolt gun that's doing just fine after three or four precision rifle classes.
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
