Author
Message
--bullseye--
Assistant to the Regional Manager
Offline
Posts: 9058
Feedback: 100% (15)
Posted: 8/29/2011 6:52:46 PM

THE IMAGE ABOVE IS A PAID ADVERTISEMENT
Just curious what the contemporary tac rifle course are teaching. I've always been comfortable with pulling the rifle into my shoulder with both my strong and support arm. Did some very basic rifle training a little while back and they were teaching us to pull in with the strong arm and push out with the support arm (like you are trying to stretch the gun apart)...
"Dwight Schrute, star salesman, beet farmer, bed and breakfast proprietor, aspiring freelance bodyguard. Add to that list owner of this building. Then burn the list."
ske714
Member
Offline
Posts: 650
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/29/2011 7:10:32 PM
[Last Edit: 8/29/2011 7:11:13 PM by ske714]
I was thought by the .mil to not even grip the rifle with my support hand, and that's what works for me.
jmh-ar-15
Team Member
Offline
Posts: 169
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/30/2011 1:37:29 AM
AS I think about it, what I do is similar to what the class taught you. I don't think I am actually pushing out with my support arm, put I am driving the gun with it.

What I am NOT trying to do is cram the gun into my shoulder as hard as I can like I was originally taught on shotguns and bolt action hunting rifles. There are good reasons for doing this with those weapons, but they are not as effective with a modern AR platform. You want the rifle snug in the pocket of your shoulder.
chwi548
Offline
Posts: 2044
Feedback: 100% (3)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/30/2011 9:41:35 AM
Originally Posted By ––bullseye––:
Just curious what the contemporary tac rifle course are teaching. I've always been comfortable with pulling the rifle into my shoulder with both my strong and support arm. Did some very basic rifle training a little while back and they were teaching us to pull in with the strong arm and push out with the support arm (like you are trying to stretch the gun apart)...


That's for recoil management for faster followup shots and driving the gun to multiple targets.

I would have an issue with not using the support hand to grip the forearm properly. Frames of reference are important here. I'd be curious to know what type of training and context the Soldier instructed why not to grip the forearm. I highly doubt it was anything to do with fighting with a gun. Shooting, maybe. But not fighting.

ske714
Member
Offline
Posts: 655
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/30/2011 10:24:42 AM
Originally Posted By chwi548:
Originally Posted By ––bullseye––:
Just curious what the contemporary tac rifle course are teaching. I've always been comfortable with pulling the rifle into my shoulder with both my strong and support arm. Did some very basic rifle training a little while back and they were teaching us to pull in with the strong arm and push out with the support arm (like you are trying to stretch the gun apart)...


That's for recoil management for faster followup shots and driving the gun to multiple targets.

I would have an issue with not using the support hand to grip the forearm properly. Frames of reference are important here. I'd be curious to know what type of training and context the Soldier instructed why not to grip the forearm. I highly doubt it was anything to do with fighting with a gun. Shooting, maybe. But not fighting.



Basic Military Training. This is what I was taught.

"Nonfiring hand grip. The rifle handguard rests on the heel of the hand in the V formed by the thumb and fingers.
The grip of the nonfiring hand is light, and slight rearward pressure is exerted."

GI Training Manual - Marksmanship Fundementals.
chwi548
Offline
Posts: 2045
Feedback: 100% (3)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/30/2011 12:27:41 PM
Exactly. Marksmanship. Not fighting. Try those techniques of not grabbing the forearm with multiple threats within 75 feet. They were instructing basic shooting skills, not fighting. There is more advanced training available, and if you consider the basic skills you learned to be enough, you are missing something and do not have a good frame of reference to pass on info relating to the OPs question. Its different than what you seem to have training in.
ske714
Member
Offline
Posts: 658
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/30/2011 12:48:12 PM
Originally Posted By chwi548:
Exactly. Marksmanship. Not fighting. Try those techniques of not grabbing the forearm with multiple threats within 75 feet. They were instructing basic shooting skills, not fighting. There is more advanced training available, and if you consider the basic skills you learned to be enough, you are missing something and do not have a good frame of reference to pass on info relating to the OPs question. Its different than what you seem to have training in.


Okay.
Schroedum
Slow steady squeeze
Offline
Posts: 216
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 10/25/2011 7:15:42 AM
I was just taught to hold the weapon into my shoulder. No special way. Always shot expert so I figured I was good.
chwi548
Offline
Posts: 2088
Feedback: 100% (3)
Link To This Post
Posted: 10/25/2011 10:18:02 AM
Originally Posted By Schroedum:
I was just taught to hold the weapon into my shoulder. No special way. Always shot expert so I figured I was good.


Shooting expert on a qual range is different than what the OP is asking. Marksmanship is important, since if you can't hit your target you're in trouble. But at the same time, FIGHTING is not Marksmanship. There is more to it. Just holding the weapon into the shoulder, taking a deep breath, letting it out, squeeeeeeeezig the trigger to get a surprise break is a good way to get dead when engaging multiple targets at close distance. If you're applying your basic marksmanship as the end-all be-all training, you're missing the boat.

It's like telling a NASCAR driver all the driver training he needs is Driver's Ed from when he was 16....

Lowlands
Nucking Futs
Offline
Posts: 153
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 11/16/2011 9:03:18 PM
[Last Edit: 11/16/2011 9:04:14 PM by Lowlands]
Originally Posted By chwi548:
Originally Posted By Schroedum:
I was just taught to hold the weapon into my shoulder. No special way. Always shot expert so I figured I was good.


Shooting expert on a qual range is different than what the OP is asking. Marksmanship is important, since if you can't hit your target you're in trouble. But at the same time, FIGHTING is not Marksmanship. There is more to it. Just holding the weapon into the shoulder, taking a deep breath, letting it out, squeeeeeeeezig the trigger to get a surprise break is a good way to get dead when engaging multiple targets at close distance. If you're applying your basic marksmanship as the end-all be-all training, you're missing the boat.

It's like telling a NASCAR driver all the driver training he needs is Driver's Ed from when he was 16....



This....


Combat accuracy is relative to the distance your target is at, things like flash sight fire come into play at close range - which is totally against the concept of marksmanship. Obviously, as distances increase, the need for incorporating more fundamentals becomes greater.

But to answer the OP, push pull is common to see for recoil management. I've been experimenting and I've had really good results with using a long handguard and reversing the push pull. It is very natural with an Isosceles stance. Grip the handguard out further and just roll your shoulders forward a bit and pinch those elbows in while pulling back on the handguard and pushing on the grip backstrap. I found it easy to really bear down using the shoulder and back muscles and the whole stance keeps my weight forward naturally.
d5griffin
Offline
Posts: 715
Feedback: 100% (25)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/10/2011 1:58:42 PM
Can only speak for Marine boot camp, but you're taught both marksmanship (long distance targets) and a fighting stance (pull rifle apart) for close engagements.

FP2000H
I'm awesome
Offline
Posts: 2338
Feedback: 100% (135)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/1/2012 9:37:40 AM
Push/pull feels odd to me. I have found that pulling the entire rifle into me feels more secure and I'm able to get back on target quicker. Of course, this is all new to me. I expect, in time, I will naturally modify and make adjustments.
You have the right to be offended.
Renn
Offline
Posts: 2445
Feedback: 100% (17)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/7/2012 5:45:14 PM
Originally Posted By chwi548:
Originally Posted By Schroedum:
I was just taught to hold the weapon into my shoulder. No special way. Always shot expert so I figured I was good.


Shooting expert on a qual range is different than what the OP is asking. Marksmanship is important, since if you can't hit your target you're in trouble. But at the same time, FIGHTING is not Marksmanship. There is more to it. Just holding the weapon into the shoulder, taking a deep breath, letting it out, squeeeeeeeezig the trigger to get a surprise break is a good way to get dead when engaging multiple targets at close distance. If you're applying your basic marksmanship as the end-all be-all training, you're missing the boat.

It's like telling a NASCAR driver all the driver training he needs is Driver's Ed from when he was 16....


well, if you can't shoot what you are fighting then you lose
WAYOFTHEGUN
Member
Offline
Posts: 10
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/8/2012 11:55:39 AM
Fellas I'm new to the forums here but I've been doing the shooting thng a while and have been teaching combat marksmanship for the past 5 years. After watching alot of people shoot and seeing shoulders moving back when the rifle fired I started teaching people what I call Positive Shoulder Most people are taught to ull the rifle into the shoulder, but nothing is ever mentioned about the shoulder. If the shoulder is left neutral the gun will push the shoulder wchich results in sight movemennt in recoil which means it takes longer to get back on target to shoot fast and accurate. To create positive shoulder just roll the shoulder/deltoid forward slighlty. Now to adress the question about how to pull the gun back into the shoulder. Most of it comes from the suppoort hand. The way I teach it is to grip the rifle long out on the forearm(you can see soem pics and video on my website www.wayofthegun.us) grip the forearm and allow the elbow to hang, this creates a camming effect that pulls the rifle into the shoulder with very little effort on your part. The firing hand may pull the rif some as well but you want to avoid over tensioning with the firing hand grip, this will result in excess tension in the trigger finger which will make it difficult to manipulate the trigger quickly. Exess tension in the grip tightens the tendons in the trigger finger which can also result in pushing the sights somewhat( not as noticeable when shooting the rifle as it is when shooting a pistol. Anyway just my 2 cents, hope it helps.
grimhollow
Member
Offline
Posts: 1019
Feedback: 100% (33)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/11/2012 7:38:47 AM
I pull back with both arms, and hold the buttstock closer to the center of my chest. This is the best method I have found for me, when it comes to combat shooting and escpecially when shooting full auto (two to three round bursts). I guess everybody has to find what works for them, and this is what works for me most of the time. Longer range shooting will probably require something different, but this is what I use most of the time.
Sappers Forward!
Britbiker
Member
Instructor
Offline
Posts: 154
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/12/2012 10:47:36 AM
We teach the push / pull on all fighting long guns. For reasons all ready stated.

“Train as you fight, fight as you train”
http://www.floridafirearmstraining.com
http://www.meetup.com/Florida-Firearms-Training/
Multi-G
Member
Instructor
Offline
Posts: 789
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 1/31/2012 8:03:58 PM
I use and advocate a forward hand pull and a push with the shoulder. Leave the other hand loose so to speak.