|
|
Posted: 7/4/2011 12:04:16 PM
THE IMAGE ABOVE IS A PAID ADVERTISEMENT I want to start a thread on this subject. Here is the NRA's brochure on the typical match set up and rules: http://issuu.com/compshoot/docs/ndmflyer2011 Information about the National Defense Match at Camp Perry starts on page 81 of this brochure: http://issuu.com/compshoot/docs/2011nranationalmatches I speculate that this is the NRA's attempt to draw 3 gun shooters into the National Match arena. I think this is a great idea. Like Mike Voigt points out, there are 20,000 USPSA shooters and probably twice as many of us who shoot outlaw 3 gun and do not belong to the USPSA. This years match is invitation only. Does anyone know how the invitations where delved out? I suspect it was to teams like the Army, FN, etc. I am local and would love to shoot in this match if anyone has an opening. What do you fellows think? |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2011 2:41:10 PM
Originally Posted By Ironmaker:
What do you fellows think? That it's a sad day when there is an "invitation only" match at the Nationals and that it is the wrong venue for Tuggle's game. At least it doesn't mess with the schedule... this time. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2011 6:24:44 PM
I don't understand the "invitation only" part. I suppose the NRA's thought is they don't know how it is going to go and they don't want to have to worry about inexperienced shooters. If that is their reason, it doesn't hold water. This is the National Matches. Joe "below average" Shooter is first, not going to be interested in a match like this initially and secondly, is not going to make the effort to go to Perry to shoot.
This match will be mild to anyone used to shooting 3 gun matches. I would think proof of previous 3 gun competition would be qualification enough. After reading the course of fire a little more, I think calling it "action shooting" is a stretch too. I'd still like to shoot in it though. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/5/2011 9:12:25 AM
[Last Edit: 7/5/2011 9:16:26 AM by BPR]
You may want to contact Trey Tuggle at the NRA to see if you can get a spot.
It reminds me of a hybid High Power/Bianchi Cup type COF. We'll see if it catches on. I think it would be a fun thing to do to get young shooters into competing, but after shooting major 3 gun matches I see this COF more as practice. Under the circumstances I can understand the invitation only format for this year. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/5/2011 3:52:58 PM
I should have elaborated.
They only have 60 spots available for shooters. I expect they are wanting to maximize exposure w/ these 60 shooters. A good cross-section from high power, 3 gun, match directors, industry reps, etc would be difficult if it was just open registration. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/7/2011 7:23:18 AM
Well, I guess from the lack of interest in a thread on the National Defense Match, there is little to no interest in this match.
Is it because it is not High Power and it is not 3 Gun, so neither group is interested? When I first heard about this match at Perry, I thought the NRA/CMP would utilize the pop-up targets and put a really cool match together, something like the Friends of Perry do. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/7/2011 8:37:04 AM
I think the lack of interest on this site is due to the fact that a large number of people that visit AR15 simply do not shoot. Evidence of this is comparing the number of mind numbing posts in General Discussion to posts regarding actual marksmanship.
They are using some sort of electronic target for this match. Pop-ups would be much cooler, but doesn't fit w/ the idea of being able to put on this match at any 100 yard range. At Perry, they are going to fire the full course out to 500 yards, but I think the reduced course is what is going to be marketed to local shooting clubs. The COF and lack of props allow this to be held anywhere w/ a 100 yard range. I encourage you to contact Trey if you are interested in shooting it. They may still have some slots available. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/7/2011 12:16:22 PM
Originally Posted By BPR: I think the lack of interest on this site is due to the fact that a large number of people that visit AR15 simply do not shoot. Evidence of this is comparing the number of mind numbing posts in General Discussion to posts regarding actual marksmanship. They are using some sort of electronic target for this match. Pop-ups would be much cooler, but doesn't fit w/ the idea of being able to put on this match at any 100 yard range. At Perry, they are going to fire the full course out to 500 yards, but I think the reduced course is what is going to be marketed to local shooting clubs. The COF and lack of props allow this to be held anywhere w/ a 100 yard range. I encourage you to contact Trey if you are interested in shooting it. They may still have some slots available. I sent Trey an email and requested an invitation. We'll see how it goes. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/8/2011 9:39:43 AM
My lack of interest in this match comes from the fact that its invitation only which goes against all the history of the National Matches. Its a poor idea. You want to run it you do the same they did with HP you run a SAFS and go.
I think NRA is making a mistake. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/8/2011 9:40:27 AM
To clarify.
Its not the format I have issues with. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/8/2011 10:03:51 AM
[Last Edit: 7/8/2011 10:04:16 AM by BPR]
Just my opinion, but I think this is more of an expo match than a true Nationals. I am not aware of any clubs that have started shooting this format yet.
The waters will be muddy if the NRA crowns a National Champ w/out an asterisk next to their name showing it was invitation only. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/8/2011 12:10:16 PM
I am interested to see how the match is run in the interest of time. I see the NRA has 2 days scheduled to run 60 shooters through it. 3 gun match directors have to keep stage scoring and re-set times in mind when designing stages. The fact that the NDM is individually timed will be a departure from what most NRA/CMP match directors are used to.
If it was me, I would have the maximum number of shooters on the line at the prescribed range, each with there own target. One scorer and one RO with a timer would go from one shooter to the next, timing them and recording the time. After everyone is done with that range, all the targets would be scored and pasted. That is still 5 trips to score and paste for a 100 yard match and 9 trips to score and paste for a 500 yard match. Where this would get tricky is the barricade. If the club only has one, it would have to be moved for every shooter. Anyway, for the NDM to catch on, it can't take all day to run 20 shooters through it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/11/2011 10:23:40 AM
I think the idea behind it is to create a rifle match that can become the Bianchi cup of the rifle.
The invitation part is to get a known set of shooters wlling to go out and shoot the match good or bad. There are sure to be certain bugs which need worked out in scoring., targets, distances and times. Once this is cleaned up and agreed upon by the Masters, it will be broadcast worldwide so others can enjoy it. I will be there with my son Colton. This should get a though going over and will be fun. Chris |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/11/2011 10:41:26 AM
[Last Edit: 7/11/2011 10:41:56 AM by _ERIK_]
Chris,
If you want to work the bugs out of a match the worst time is during a national championship. If the idea is to work the bugs out run some regionals at Perry. That will work the bugs out. I got it that NRA is trying to bring in a bigger crew. I think getting shooters on the line is a great thing. I think its a absolutely terrible idea to have a invitation only match at Nationals. Again 100 plus years of tradition, have made the matches what they are, great. You get all sorts of shooters on the line military civilian young and old. This match does not allow for it. That is my beef. I have shoot plenty of run and gun in my time so dont think I am a HP shooter who is hating. I am a traditionalist that would like to see Camp Perry continue to be open to all. Erik edit ao=so |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/11/2011 10:48:37 AM
Mr. Tuggle just sent me an entry form. Looks like I'm shooting in it.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2011 10:12:39 PM
[Last Edit: 8/15/2011 11:23:20 PM by OhioLongRange]
nm......
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/8/2011 9:55:52 PM
I'm looking forward to this. I can't say this looks like an exciting match format after shooting many of the major 3 gun matches, but I think it will be a great experience.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/15/2011 11:23:31 PM
Chris Cerino's son, a freshman high school student, scored first place in the Optics Divisions and 5th place overall. This was a huge success considering he was shooting against national champions.
Ian from topshot season 1 took overall 1st i believe |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/16/2011 3:45:55 PM
Did the match take both Saturday and Sunday to complete or did they get it all in on Saturday?
I received an invite, but after realizing it was scheduled for 2 days, I had to decline. I did shoot in my local club's 2 gun (rifle, pistol) match on Saturday and finished first. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/16/2011 4:50:32 PM
[Last Edit: 8/16/2011 4:53:15 PM by BPR]
We were originally going to shoot the entire course of fire on Saturday and again on Sunday. But, after getting a little bit of a late start and a few delays due to the electronic targets and some shooters cross-firing on the wrong target we had to call it a day on Saturday after the 200 yard stage. On Sunday morning, we shot the 300 and 400, but had to evacuate the range after getting set up for 500 due to the storm. I joked w/ some of the other guys that this was the "bugout" portion of the match designed to test our readiness.
The electronic targets were awesome- but there were some delays with verifying everything was working properly. FNH USA, Geissele, and all the other sponsors were great to the competitors. There were quite a few juniors at the match, and they looked like they had a great time- especially Colton Cerino who won the Tactical divison as noted above. Iain Harrison won Open, with Tommy Thacker in 2nd. Edward Altmeyer (I belive is his name) won Limited, I came in 2nd after making a bad wind call at 400. This was the first NRA match I've shot. They are serious about trigger weights. The first lower I took to have the trigger weighed did not make the 4 1/2# requirement and I sure wasn't going to shoot open w/ irons. I swapped out lowers, had it re-weighed, and after passing 4 1/2# we got started. I'm glad I took a spare lower.... I met a lot of new friends, and I think we talked enough 3 gun that Chris Cerino is now hooked even before he starts. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/16/2011 10:30:06 PM
we talked enough 3 gun that Chris Cerino is now hooked even before he starts.
he is.. i was hanging out with him and Ian for 2 hours today... Colton rocked the long range targets from his dads wind call, this was killing many of the other shooters... he got the wind call from me setting him up with Ballistic FTE and giving him a lesson on how to use it. :) |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/17/2011 7:28:09 AM
Can you give me a run down on how the course of fire went?
How many shooters on the line at a time? How many barricades? How hard will it be to score quickly without electronic targets? etc I just can't imagine how this will flow smoothly enough to get 20 to 30 shooters through without taking all day. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/17/2011 12:30:31 PM
[Last Edit: 8/17/2011 12:32:12 PM by Muad]
Originally Posted By Ironmaker:
Can you give me a run down on how the course of fire went? How many shooters on the line at a time? How many barricades? How hard will it be to score quickly without electronic targets? etc I just can't imagine how this will flow smoothly enough to get 20 to 30 shooters through without taking all day. It was the first time they actually ran the match, so you have to expect some bugs. In our situation, we had to wait for the computers to load all the shot information between strings of fire. At some points we were flowing pretty good, however cross fires hosed that up pretty well. We had six shooting positions, with 8 relays. I was relay 7, shooting position 5. There were barricades at each shooting position. I was glad we didn't go through the course of fire twice. It would have just taken too long, and that's double the ammo. I think we could have shot longer on Saturday, however he the sun was harsh, and we did have some older shooters out there; I think they wanted to make sure no one got over heated. I wish the storms could have waited another 30-45 minutes on Sunday. We could have probably shot the 500. I was bummed as I had practiced the 500 on Thursday, and was very happy with my results. So, I was hoping to move up a few spots in Tac. Limited. I'm still happy with my performance, considering my skill level and the competition. I loved the match, and we'll be holding them at Sandusky County Sportsman's Club here in the near future for sure. -Will C. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/17/2011 3:01:40 PM
3-gun at camp perry?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/17/2011 3:06:30 PM
Originally Posted By Couch-Commando: 3-gun at camp perry? No, not really. http://issuu.com/compshoot/docs/ndmflyer2011 |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/17/2011 4:48:26 PM
164 round two day match will NOT fly at my local club. There's just no way we can shut the range down for the entire weekend. Cramming it in to one long day will even be difficult. We get enough grief shutting the range down a half a day for our monthly IDPA shoot. I'll give NRA an "E" for effort but I'm not certain this will take off.
|
|
|