Posted: 2/2/2015 11:19:07 AM EDT
[#11]
Quote History Quoted:
BUG got supper sized big time, especial BUG-Revolver. You can get two 442/642 revolver in the BUG box and still be well under the weight limit. A S&W 686 (L-Frame) with a 3 inch barrel is now a BUG gun. WTF
An L-frame with a 3 inch barrel was a BUG before too, you just had an empty cylinder. There were all sorts of interesting guns that were legal at the BUG Nationals. Now BUG revolvers have to fit in the box. Before there was just a barrel size limit.
I do appreciate that they went to 6 rounds in BUG and got rid of that no reload on the clock stuff. But now no j-frame .38s and you can use a .380acp.
Seems sort of silly and missiong the point of the division. Thought IDPA prided themselves in more realist equipment rules The division are all too big. The 686 is not a bug, except maybe to Andrea the Giant. Even my XD-40 Service (4 inch barrel and full size frame/grip) is legal in the new CCP. There is nothing compact about and XD-40 Service its a duty size weapon. I am going to start a partition to allow me to duel wield 442s in BUG matches.
Every division is just one size too big. Compact carry is real carry, BUG is small carry, and SSP & ESP are night stand guns. Granted, lots of people can and do carry full size guns, but you get my point. Real BUGs usually have crappy sights, and who would want to use one of those?
The tough part is that when you have an idea for a division, you have to create rules for it, and then now you have guns that are the same as what you intend for people to use according to the rules, but way different in practical use. They don't want to come up with a list of approved/not approved guns, so that's what we end up with.
I try not to get tied up in the names.
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quote History Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm actually a little disappointed they didn't cut the barrel length back to 3.75. That would have eliminated Glock 19s, Sig p229, CZ compacts, etc, but would have allowed for the Glock 26, M&Pc, Officer model 1911, p224, XDs, Shield, etc.
But I guess when they beefed up the Bug gun stuff, they wanted something in the middle. Especially since they bumped it to 6 rounds instead of 5, and they removed the part about not allowing people to reload on the clock. Now BUG can be in regular matches, or be made into a side match.
Overall, pretty good changes. I haven't found anything that bothers me yet.
BUG got supper sized big time, especial BUG-Revolver. You can get two 442/642 revolver in the BUG box and still be well under the weight limit. A S&W 686 (L-Frame) with a 3 inch barrel is now a BUG gun. WTF
An L-frame with a 3 inch barrel was a BUG before too, you just had an empty cylinder. There were all sorts of interesting guns that were legal at the BUG Nationals. Now BUG revolvers have to fit in the box. Before there was just a barrel size limit.
I do appreciate that they went to 6 rounds in BUG and got rid of that no reload on the clock stuff. But now no j-frame .38s and you can use a .380acp.
Seems sort of silly and missiong the point of the division. Thought IDPA prided themselves in more realist equipment rules The division are all too big. The 686 is not a bug, except maybe to Andrea the Giant. Even my XD-40 Service (4 inch barrel and full size frame/grip) is legal in the new CCP. There is nothing compact about and XD-40 Service its a duty size weapon. I am going to start a partition to allow me to duel wield 442s in BUG matches.
Every division is just one size too big. Compact carry is real carry, BUG is small carry, and SSP & ESP are night stand guns. Granted, lots of people can and do carry full size guns, but you get my point. Real BUGs usually have crappy sights, and who would want to use one of those?
The tough part is that when you have an idea for a division, you have to create rules for it, and then now you have guns that are the same as what you intend for people to use according to the rules, but way different in practical use. They don't want to come up with a list of approved/not approved guns, so that's what we end up with.
I try not to get tied up in the names.
Why not make the names accurate? Why not have a true BUG gun division? A true BUG gun division would probably get more participation then the old ESR division did before it got rolled into the new Revolver division.
|
|