Quote History Quoted:
When will this happen? I can't see anyone refreshing the tree period, and not just in NY but anywhere across the union. Our politicians have used the law to turn we the people into the biggest sheeple ever seen. The pussyfication of America.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
<----------My shocked face
Most of these politicians are meglomaniac scumbags that us little people just pay their salary
That's because they don't fear the public any longer..
Bring back the liberty tree and you see how fast there attitudes would change.
When will this happen? I can't see anyone refreshing the tree period, and not just in NY but anywhere across the union. Our politicians have used the law to turn we the people into the biggest sheeple ever seen. The pussyfication of America.
the FFs should have specifically stated in the constitution that if an officeholder does X he shall have the protection of law witheld and it shall be lawful to assault or kill him on site. Then the tree could be fed and servant of liberty would have a defense, in court if necessary, and could effect liberty w/o necessarily having to totally forefeet his whole life. Or at least specific acts of betrayal against the USC or BOR should have had a penalty written into them as if they were penal legislation.
Laws against normal poeple have penalties written into them. acts that strike at the very heart of the constituion itself, such as violations against the BOR, are not really staturorialy prohibited, let alone with any penalty of prison etc. I consider attempts to restrict free speech,religion,press, freedom from search, seiziure & confiscation w/o due process, the ownership and carriage of arms committed under the colour of law to be nothign less than high treason which should be dealt with by capitol punishment. The consitution itself could be considered a type of law agianst the government, obviously not outlawing government, but restricting government. Unfortunately, it is as a law w/o a penaly which makes it merely a suggestion.
Imagine how much better the 2nd amendment was something like:
"...the right of the people to keep & bear arms shall not...and any such officeholder, judge, legislator or agent thereof attempting to carry out such...shall be guilty of high treason and subjec to death"
Currently, the USC is understood as a suggestion to the gov, while the gov passes laws backed w/ the threat of actual violence. This type of a one way power dynamic where gov is expected to hold itself accountable is obviously not working.