Quote History Quoted:
This. They could start banning stuff by name again.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History Quoted:
Quoted:
Now we will have a class of functional semi auto defensive guns that they CAN'T ban unless they outright ban ALL semi autos with detachable mags (essentially the same as all modern handguns). Which will NEVER happen. Mark my words. Never. All they've been able to get away with are stupid feature bans...which yes are very unconstitutional and very inconvenient...but we CAN work around them...and we WILL prevail...ingenuity always does.
These guns also prove that banning features and parts is arbitrary and capricious (aka unconstitutional).
Never ?
Really?
How many believed a ban like the unsafe act could never happen?
The libs will never stop until they ban everything. They have made great progress in New York, they won't stop now.
This gun's legal status in New York may be short lived.
Hope for the best.
This. They could start banning stuff by name again.
When Feistein proposed her AWB in 2013, she named tons of weapons by name (both as banned and as not banned.) Oddly, the Mini-14 was specifically named as
not being banned. Unless these become ridiculously popular, what's the chance that they would even know to ban it.
As for the full "semi auto with detachable magazines" ban, the more that they include, the greater the chance that it gets overturned in the SCOTUS. They'd be adding a substantial number of hunting rifles to the list and adding their owners to the opposition. You would also then see a rise is stripper-clip fed semiautomatic rifles. Would they actually try and be able to ban all semiautomatic rifles?