Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page Hometown » Utah
Posted: 2/26/2014 6:26:40 PM EDT
Looking to set one up. Did you pay or did you use a free template? Experience any issues applying for your NFA items?
Link Posted: 2/26/2014 9:42:20 PM EDT
[#1]
Link Posted: 2/26/2014 11:55:26 PM EDT
[#2]
I was having the same thought today, about looking into setting up a trust in Utah. any info would be helpful
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 1:19:18 AM EDT
[#3]
This is who I used for my trust and have recommended her to others. Very easy to work with and fast turn around.

http://ratellelaw.com/
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 11:33:32 AM EDT
[#4]
Anyone in Utah set up their own trust? Just curious as to how hard it is to do this in Utah (each state is supposedly different).
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 11:22:38 PM EDT
[#5]
Link Posted: 3/5/2014 12:26:42 PM EDT
[#6]
I made a template for a Utah gun trust. I know of 3 trusts made with this that all have NFA items on them. I personally have 4 stamps on mine. Im no lawyer but ive read the issues with quicken trusts is that they dont have a clause dealing with minors receiving NFA items while this does. So if you want to use it its there

DIY Utah Trust
Link Posted: 3/6/2014 12:49:25 AM EDT
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I made a template for a Utah gun trust. I know of 3 trusts made with this that all have NFA items on them. I personally have 4 stamps on mine. Im no lawyer but ive read the issues with quicken trusts is that they dont have a clause dealing with minors receiving NFA items while this does. So if you want to use it its there

DIY Utah Trust
View Quote


Thanks for posting that
Link Posted: 3/10/2014 12:44:48 AM EDT
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I made a template for a Utah gun trust. I know of 3 trusts made with this that all have NFA items on them. I personally have 4 stamps on mine. Im no lawyer but ive read the issues with quicken trusts is that they dont have a clause dealing with minors receiving NFA items while this does. So if you want to use it its there

DIY Utah Trust
View Quote


Thanks for posting. I've read through all the laws and regulations on owning NFA items and key benefits and considerations for trusts and it seems like the clauses dealing with minors is the main concern.
Link Posted: 3/19/2014 11:27:34 PM EDT
[#9]
(NOTE: i re-read what i just wrote, and it's clearly off-topic in many areas; however, some of it is applicable to the topic at hand. mostly i just want to rant right now.)





i'm a practicing attorney in Utah who has recently done a trust for a
couple eForms i submitted a couple months back. none of this is legal
advice, but i just have a couple thoughts:





i've done a cursory
review of the actual language of the NFA, the GCA, and the regulations
in the CFR implementing both sets of laws. there are minimal references
to trusts; really it just says that a "person" is also a trust (or
corporation, etc). this is the part of the law that is beneficial to so
many people, in that a trust can own the otherwise-prohibited item, and
one can skip all the CLEO/fingerprints/etc mumbo jumbo.





trusts
are creatures of state law, so as long as a trust is valid in Utah, it
would be valid for the purposes of obtaining an SBR, suppressor, and the
like. the requirements in Utah for a trust are VERY VERY VERY VERY VERY
minimal. in fact, you can see that by looking at the controlling
statute: http://www.le.utah.gov/code/TITLE75/htm/75_07_040200.htm.





there
is nothing required to be in an "NFA" trust outside of the basic
requirements of trust creation pursuant to the cited statute. as far as i
can tell, all the NFA language i've seen in "NFA" trusts is just for
the warm fuzzy feeling people want when going to an attorney and
shelling out hundreds and hundreds of dollars for a trust. many "NFA"
trusts have language like "No trustee shall accomplish any transfer of
the NFA items, if such transfer is not in compliance with all NFA laws."
that is true, but so is this sentence: "No trustee shall kill a
beneficiary, because it's against the law."





the only language i
can really see necessary in an "NFA" trust is something indicating that a
trustee should take care in ensuring that all federal laws are followed
when disbursing the items to the beneficiaries upon the death of the
trustor(s)/grantor(s). that's it. but even that is not necessary
for a valid trust; that's simply helping out the trustee who is gonna
hand over the items to the beneficiaries when you're dead.





i've
read a lot of rumors about the ATF "invalidating" a trust, but have
never seen a case, newspaper article, or anything else reliable
indicating that such an occurrence has ever happened (my suspicion is
that it has never happened...). further, the ATF couldn't "invalidate" a
trust, as only a court of proper jurisdiction can - that would be a
Utah District Court. finally, the ATF has neither the manpower nor the
resources to screen every single trust submitted with a Form 1 or Form 4
(or any other form) to determine if it was properly created according
to the laws of the state under which it is governed. every single
examiner would have to know and properly apply the (sometimes complex,
sometimes simple) rules of trust creation from FIFTY STATES. there is
simply no logic in the idea that he ATF is scouring through my trust to
determine if it's valid. and again, even if they WERE doing that, they'd
have to institute litigation in a Utah District Court in order to
obtain some type of declaratory judgment invalidating my trust, before
they could take action to show that i'm in violation of some federal
law.





i've only ever heard one argument - from a fellow lawyer
here on arfcom - that makes sense as to when a trust might be
challenged, and that's if you shoot someone with your
SBR/suppressor/SBS/etc and during the investigation it's determined that
your trust isn't up to par. however, once you get your tax stamp, there
is no requirement (as far as i've read) to provide to the ATF a copy of
your trust; you're only required to provide, upon request, a copy of
your tax stamp to show you're in valid possession of the SBR/suppressor/SBS/etc.





sorry
if this is heated; it's certainly not meant to step on anyone's toes or
make anyone feel stupid. there is simply a lot of stuff thrown around
on arfcom (especially in the SBR/Class 3 forum) that is misleading
and/or patently incorrect (despite the good intentions of those who are
sharing it).





i'm currently working on an in-depth review/analysis
of the NFA/GCA and supporting regulations, which i plan on posting in
the SBR sub-forum. wife and i have a baby due any minute, so that
project has taken the back seat for now.



ETA: hit me up if you're interested in a trust. in real life i'm not nearly as big of a dick as i might appear online

Link Posted: 3/25/2014 12:38:08 AM EDT
[#10]


Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



(NOTE: i re-read what i just wrote, and it's clearly off-topic in many areas; however, some of it is applicable to the topic at hand. mostly i just want to rant right now.)





i've only ever heard one argument - from a fellow lawyer here on arfcom - that makes sense as to when a trust might be challenged, and that's if you shoot someone with your SBR/suppressor/SBS/etc and during the investigation it's determined that your trust isn't up to par. however, once you get your tax stamp, there is no requirement (as far as i've read) to provide to the ATF a copy of your trust; you're only required to provide, upon request, a copy of your tax stamp to show you're in valid possession of the SBR/suppressor/SBS/etc.
View Quote





 

The highlighted does not hold true if you file an eForm.  When eForms are used you have to submit a copy of the trust as identified here:














Great writeup.  Always good to have a second opinion other than the NSA plants working for the ATF on these forums.

 
Link Posted: 4/1/2014 2:09:10 PM EDT
[#11]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:





 
The highlighted does not hold true if you file an eForm.  When eForms are used you have to submit a copy of the trust as identified here:
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Quoted:

(NOTE: i re-read what i just wrote, and it's clearly off-topic in many areas; however, some of it is applicable to the topic at hand. mostly i just want to rant right now.)



i've only ever heard one argument - from a fellow lawyer here on arfcom - that makes sense as to when a trust might be challenged, and that's if you shoot someone with your SBR/suppressor/SBS/etc and during the investigation it's determined that your trust isn't up to par. however, once you get your tax stamp, there is no requirement (as far as i've read) to provide to the ATF a copy of your trust; you're only required to provide, upon request, a copy of your tax stamp to show you're in valid possession of the SBR/suppressor/SBS/etc.







 
The highlighted does not hold true if you file an eForm.  When eForms are used you have to submit a copy of the trust as identified here:








Great writeup.  Always good to have a second opinion other than the NSA plants working for the ATF on these forums.
 
you are correct that the highlighted doesn't hold true if you file an eForm - i've actually got 2 Form 1's (via eForms) pending. i was just referring to the hypothetical situation where you get a tax stamp, end up using the gun defensively, and the ATF demands to see your tax stamp. from what i read, you only have to provide a copy of the tax stamp, and not your trust. i should have clarified.

 





Link Posted: 4/25/2014 11:32:56 PM EDT
[#12]
so tell me then after you fill out this trust then what ? is it just as simple as recording it at the county office ?
Link Posted: 4/26/2014 11:24:44 AM EDT
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
so tell me then after you fill out this trust then what ? is it just as simple as recording it at the county office ?
View Quote


You fill it out and get it notarized and you are done. Do not record it with the county office. I called the SLC county recorder and they advised against it since it was not required and that the information would become public record.
Link Posted: 4/30/2014 8:12:21 AM EDT
[#14]
If its that easy why in the he'll do lawyers charge so damn much they have their fracking secretary's type them notarize them am call me to pick it up that's a Fucking
joke
Link Posted: 4/30/2014 9:36:24 AM EDT
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
If its that easy why in the he'll do lawyers charge so damn much they have their fracking secretary's type them notarize them am call me to pick it up that's a Fucking
joke
View Quote


Knowledge is power. Some people would rather not deal with the uncertainty of doing things themselves which is understandable. Im more of a do it yourself person though thus the trust i made which has worked great. I know of about 10 stamps that have been acquired using that trust template.
Link Posted: 9/12/2014 4:08:16 PM EDT
[#16]
in light of the thread gaining traction in GD (for those who do not venture in to the madness).
http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1624460_ATF_ruling_may_have_opened_door_to_new_machine_guns__Pg9_Form_1_APPROVED_Pg18_ATF_call_audio.html

BTT for relevance.

I may have some papers to get notarized...
thanks for the template dbaird.
Page Hometown » Utah
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top