Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Posted: 7/28/2016 1:33:24 PM EDT
Y'all,

I'm a Georgia resident, but like many other firearms folks, pay close attention to what goes on in other states.  Based on my knowledge of SB 941, isn't this pastor's handing of the rifle to a parishioner for safekeeping illegal?  If so, this could be an incident to make a good case against SB 941's provisions.

"They drove it to the home of a parishioner, a 'responsible gun owner,' Lucas said, who offered to keep the rifle locked up in a gun safe until the pastor is ready to destroy it."

Why this pastor spent $3,000 in church funds to win a raffle with an AR-15 as the prize

Mind you, I have no issue with the pastor's decision that he will destroy the rifle.  IMO, since it's his private property and can dispose of it that way if he pleases.

Regards,
Shawn
Link Posted: 7/28/2016 2:21:07 PM EDT
[#1]



Quoted:




Y'all,
I'm a Georgia resident, but like many other firearms folks, pay close attention to what goes on in other states.  Based on my knowledge of SB 941, isn't this pastor's handing of the rifle to a parishioner for safekeeping illegal?  If so, this could be an incident to make a good case against SB 941's provisions.
"They drove it to the home of a parishioner, a 'responsible gun owner,' Lucas said, who offered to keep the rifle locked up in a gun safe until the pastor is ready to destroy it."
Why this pastor spent $3,000 in church funds to win a raffle with an AR-15 as the prize
Mind you, I have no issue with the pastor's decision that he will destroy the rifle.  IMO, since it's his private property and can dispose of it that way if he pleases.
Regards,



Shawn
View Quote












I believe it is.  Yes.








I'm not going to hold my breath for prosecution.  Some people are more equal than others.










The "Oregon Firearms Safety
Act” – Highlights








Updated 7/6/15







Senate Bill 941, signed into
law by Governor Brown on May 11, 2015, as the Oregon Firearms Safety Act, adds
the requirement of a background check for firearm transfers between
private-parties to existing law. Included in this law are exemptions for some
individuals and circumstances. This document serves to highlight only changes
to the Oregon firearm transfer process as a result of this legislation. Please
refer to the SB 941 Enrolled bill for the complete text. Highlights are as
follows:







Definition: "Transfer” means the delivery of a firearm from a
transferor to a transferee, including, but not limited to: the sale, gift, loan
or lease of the firearm.








Exceptions, Exemptions,
Non-Applicable Circumstances







1. "Transfer” does not
include: The temporary provision of a
firearm to a transferee if the transferor has no reason to believe the
transferee is prohibited from possessing a firearm or intends to use the
firearm in the commission of a crime, and the provision occurs:
















a.
At a shooting range, shooting gallery or other area designed for the purpose of
target shooting, for use during target practice, a firearms safety or training
course or class or a similar lawful activity;







b.
For the purpose of hunting, trapping or target shooting, during the time in
which the transferee is engaged in activities related to hunting, trapping or
target shooting;







c.
Under circumstances in which the transferee and the firearm are in the presence
of the transferor;







d.
To a transferee who is in the business of repairing firearms, for the time
during which the firearm is being repaired;







e.
To a transferee who is in the business of making or repairing custom
accessories for firearms, for the time during which the accessories are being
made or repaired; or







f. For the purpose of
preventing imminent death or serious physical injury, and the provision lasts
only as long as is necessary to prevent the death or serious physical injury.















2. Background
Check Requirements do not apply to:








a.
Firearm transfers by or to a law enforcement agency;







b. Firearm transfers by or to a
law enforcement officer, private security professional or member of the US
Armed Forces, while that person is acting in the scope of their official
duties;







c. A transfer
as part of a firearm turn-in or buyback event, where a law enforcement agency
receives or purchases firearms from members of the public;







d. A
transferor’s: spouse or domestic partner; parent or stepparent; a transferor’s
child or stepchild; a transferor’s sibling, grandparent, grandchild, aunt or
uncle, first cousin, niece or nephew, or the spouse or domestic partner of any
of the above relatives;







e. Spouse or
domestic partner to any of the relatives noted in 2(d) above;







f. Transfer
that occurs because of the death of the firearm owner, provided that: 1. The
transfer is conducted or facilitated by a personal representative, as defined
in ORS 111.005, or a trustee of a trust created in a will; and







2. The
transferee is related to the deceased firearm owner in a manner specified in
numbers 2(d) and 2(e) above.







g. Transfer of
service weapons under ORS 181.150. (Note: This is existing statute)







General
Process Changes under Oregon Firearms Safety Act:







1.
Private-party firearm transfers must be conducted through a licensed firearm
dealer while both parties (owner of the firearm and proposed recipient or
purchaser) are present. a. If the transferor and the transferee reside over 40
miles from each other, the transferor may ship or deliver the firearm to a
firearm dealer located near the transferee or a firearm dealer designated by
the transferee, and the transferor need not appear before the firearm dealer in
person.







2. A firearm
dealer who agrees to complete the transfer shall request a background check on
the transferee and shall comply with all requirements of federal law.







3. A firearm
dealer may charge a reasonable fee for facilitating a firearms transfer.







4. A firearm
dealer that requests a background check for a private party under this law is
immune from civil liability for any use of the firearm by the recipient.







5. A private
party transferring a firearm at a gun show must complete a background check
through OSP or a firearm dealer prior to the transfer. (NOTE: This is existing
statute, however is highlighted to show the private party has options, in these
instances.)







New Mental
Health Disqualification







1. Under ORS 426.133,
a court that orders outpatient treatment may prohibit a person from purchasing
or possessing a firearm during the period of assisted outpatient treatment if
in the opinion of the court, there is a reasonable likelihood the person would
constitute a danger to self or others or to the community as a result of the
person’s mental or psychological state demonstrated by either past behavior or
involvement in unlawful violence or
threats of violence, or by reason of a single incident of extreme, violent,
unlawful conduct.







2. The court
that orders outpatient treatment and prohibits a person from purchasing or
possessing a firearm during the period of assisted outpatient treatment shall
deliver a copy of the order to the county sheriff, who shall enter the
information into LEDS.







3. Individuals
subject to these orders will be included in the FBI NICS Index under ORS
181.740.







4. Important
note: Relief from prohibition for mental health reasons must be obtained
through the Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB) under ORS 166.274 in order
to regain rights at both the state and federal levels.















Enforcement
action:








1. Failure to
comply with the requirements is a Class A misdemeanor.







2. Failure to
comply with the requirements, if the person has a previous conviction under the
law at the time of the current offense, is a Class B Felony.







3. Failure to
comply with the requirements for a private party at a gun show, if the
transferor has two or more previous convictions under 166.438, is a Class C
Felony. (Note: this is existing law)







4. If the
Department (OSP) determines that a recipient is prohibited from possessing a
firearm under ORS 166.250 (1) (c), as soon as practicable, the department may
report the attempted transfer and the recipient’s name to the appropriate law
enforcement agency.















Effective
Dates







1. Effective
upon passage due to declared emergency. (5/11/15)







2. Orders
regarding assisted outpatient treatment apply only when entered on or after the
effective date.







3. Section 2
and statutory amendments become operative 90 days after the effective date.
(8/9/15)


























 
Link Posted: 7/28/2016 4:33:19 PM EDT
[#2]
I was thinking that it might also be illegal because he didn't transfer it with the intent to be the user.  He had it transferred to himself, with the intent to give it to someone else.  Straw purchase?
Link Posted: 7/28/2016 8:49:23 PM EDT
[#3]
Unless the pastor and his parishioner went down to a gunshop, and the parishioner passed a BGC, and tranferring the rifle to the parishioner, that was illegal as hell.

Unless the parishioner is the son of the pastor, or vice versa...
Link Posted: 7/29/2016 8:45:37 PM EDT
[#4]
I hope he gets arrested and charged. I'll show up for his court dates to laugh.
Link Posted: 8/6/2016 5:43:35 AM EDT
[#5]
Link Posted: 8/7/2016 8:48:09 PM EDT
[#6]
"Anything that furthers the conversation about our gun laws in the state of Oregon, I'm happy that that would happen," [gun hater] said.
View Quote


I would hope that this would further the conversation into how ridiculous SB941 was.
Link Posted: 8/7/2016 9:03:50 PM EDT
[#7]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
View Quote



Still says "could".





 
Link Posted: 8/7/2016 9:08:21 PM EDT
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:Still says "could".
View Quote

True, but at least it's getting noticed and there's some movement on it, instead of just blowing it off.
Link Posted: 8/8/2016 1:29:18 AM EDT
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

True, but at least it's getting noticed and there's some movement on it, instead of just blowing it off.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:Still says "could".

True, but at least it's getting noticed and there's some movement on it, instead of just blowing it off.


OSP will "investigate" for a month or so and let this quietly die with no charges laid in a slam-dunk case after it passes from the public's attention.

Some time later, some poor bastard from Roseburg will end up doing hard time for lending his squirrel gun to his cousin.

'Murica, fuck yeah!
Link Posted: 8/8/2016 1:03:33 PM EDT
[#10]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
OSP will "investigate" for a month or so and let this quietly die with no charges laid in a slam-dunk case after it passes from the public's attention.



Some time later, some poor bastard from Roseburg will end up doing hard time for lending his squirrel gun to his cousin.



'Murica, fuck yeah!
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Quoted:


Quoted:Still says "could".


True, but at least it's getting noticed and there's some movement on it, instead of just blowing it off.




OSP will "investigate" for a month or so and let this quietly die with no charges laid in a slam-dunk case after it passes from the public's attention.



Some time later, some poor bastard from Roseburg will end up doing hard time for lending his squirrel gun to his cousin.



'Murica, fuck yeah!




Nailed it.



 

Link Posted: 9/29/2016 9:45:19 PM EDT
[#11]
Bumping this to see if anyone has an update on how OSP's "investigation" into this crime is going.
Link Posted: 9/29/2016 10:00:33 PM EDT
[#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Bumping this to see if anyone has an update on how OSP's "investigation" into this crime is going.
View Quote


http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2016/09/lake_oswego_pastor_wont_be_cha.html
Link Posted: 9/29/2016 11:45:02 PM EDT
[#13]
I love it! A confession is insufficient evidence!

"None of the witnesses nor documentary evidence obtained by Oregon State Police prove that an actual 'transfer' occurred," Clackamas County District Attorney John Foote wrote in a letter declining to file charges. "The suspect's statement to the media that he gave it to someone for safe keeping is insufficient to prove that it did happen."

I guess this means that private transfers are still OK in OR as long as we make a statement to the media that the transfer took place.

What. A. Fucking. Joke.
Link Posted: 9/30/2016 1:50:31 PM EDT
[#14]

Yeah.  


What a bunch of shit.


Dude just walks because he's got the "proper" political beliefs.  











Link Posted: 10/15/2016 4:22:30 PM EDT
[#15]
What a load of horse shit. Laws are made to apply to all not to exempt the select few. This the UN-rational thought process of the <-.
Link Posted: 10/16/2016 10:29:03 AM EDT
[#16]
Jesus christ.

There is nothing..and I mean fucking nothing I hate more than liberals.

Dude shold be charged Lord knows I would be.
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 10:34:24 AM EDT
[#17]
The silver lining is, 941 wasn't enforced!

Even though the pastor is a pussy piece of shit and I would like to call him out for his crap, at the end of the day, 941 was not enforced!
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 11:32:36 AM EDT
[#18]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


The silver lining is, 941 wasn't enforced!



Even though the pastor is a pussy piece of shit and I would like to call him out for his crap, at the end of the day, 941 was not enforced!
View Quote
The problem with that is, it wasn't enforced on HIM.  YOU AND I wouldn't be so fortunate.  And while you're attorney may bring this up at your trial, it didn't set any precedent.



 
Link Posted: 10/31/2016 4:11:16 AM EDT
[#19]
$3,000 to fund for a riffle to get destroy... this guy must have more money than GOD. I would never set my foot into his church.
Link Posted: 11/12/2016 3:08:38 AM EDT
[#20]
Most LE don't even know how the law works, other than for "sales". We used to routinely let friends or family members take temporary possession of firearms if a person voluntarily did so after being placed on a suicide hold. Just the other day we had some Deputies let a neighbor hang onto a guys guns who was suicidal and had surrendered after being armed and barricaded. The law is a joke and most cops don't even know all the ins and outs. Of course when I found out what had happened, I didn't say a word as we unknowingly allowed the guy to break the law by "transferring" the firearms and will cause the good neighbor to also break the same law when he gives the owner back his guns.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top