Quote History Quoted:
Forgive the ignorance, but wouldn't it have been easier to go back to the agency that issued you the P229 and let them deal with it? No reason you should have to pay for sights on a duty weapon.
View Quote
Cheaper.....yes. Easier.......no.
I am an Armorer for my agency, but they don't have replacement sights at the field office level, and they will not send us any. Only way I could have had the sights replaced through my agency is to overnight my handgun to HQ, where they will replace the sight(s), test fire, and overnight it back. Best case scenario is 3 days. During those 3 days I would have to carry a spare weapon from the armory, which isn't set up the same way as mine. In addition to this, I hate the almost $200 total round trip cost that the government pays for shipping my gun back and forth. Waste of taxpayers' money.
So, easiest way to take care of the issue is for me to buy a set of sights and put them on. No shipping back and forth, I don't have to carry a spare weapon, and I'll write the Trijicons off on my taxes.