User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 10/28/2016 10:01:11 PM EDT
[#1]
Constitutional Amendment 1 would renew the existing sales and use tax of 0.1 percent for 10 years. NO.
Constitutional Amendment 2 would establish limits on campaign contributions to candidates for state or judicial office. YES. Constitutional Amendment 3 would increase the taxes on cigarette packs to 60 cents by 2020. Hell NO and I don't smoke. Constitutional Amendment 4 would prohibit a new state sales or use tax on any service or activity that was not subject to a sales or use tax as of January 1, 2015. Hell YES!! Constitutional Amendment 6 would empower the state government to require the presentation of voter IDs at public elections for the purpose of identifying and proving national and state citizenship. YES. This is where I'm at right now 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/28/2016 10:59:09 PM EDT
[#2]
^ agreed with ZB!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/29/2016 10:25:21 AM EDT
[#3]
1. Yes
2. Yes 3. No 4. Yes 6. Yes |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/29/2016 11:18:52 AM EDT
[#4]
FYI, Jay Nixon, the St. Louis Post Dispatch, and the democrats are all FOR/YES on Amendment 2. My gut then says NO.
http://www.971talk.com/blogs/marc-cox/news-desk/missouri-ballot-measures-marc-cox |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/29/2016 2:58:51 PM EDT
[#5]
No on all except Amendment 1 and voter ID.
The no new tax is fucking stupid. There could be whole new categories of commerce in future years that would be exempt and have massive advantages over legacy businesses. Bad juju. Both tobacco taxes are stupid, #3 taxes the poor so they can pay their kids pre-k (statistically more lower income smoke), and Prop A is just garbage. If we need more road money raise the fuel taxes and put a yearly use tax on EV's. Campaign contribution limits are great for democrats... Not so good for third parties or GOP. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/29/2016 5:04:51 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
No on all except Amendment 1 and voter ID. The no new tax is fucking stupid. There could be whole new categories of commerce in future years that would be exempt and have massive advantages over legacy businesses. Bad juju. Both tobacco taxes are stupid, #3 taxes the poor so they can pay their kids pre-k (statistically more lower income smoke), and Prop A is just garbage. If we need more road money raise the fuel taxes and put a yearly use tax on EV's. Campaign contribution limits are great for democrats... Not so good for third parties or GOP. What new categories of business |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/29/2016 9:51:03 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Constitutional Amendment 1 would renew the existing sales and use tax of 0.1 percent for 10 years. NO. Constitutional Amendment 2 would establish limits on campaign contributions to candidates for state or judicial office. YES. Constitutional Amendment 3 would increase the taxes on cigarette packs to 60 cents by 2020. Hell NO and I don't smoke. Constitutional Amendment 4 would prohibit a new state sales or use tax on any service or activity that was not subject to a sales or use tax as of January 1, 2015. Hell YES!! Constitutional Amendment 6 would empower the state government to require the presentation of voter IDs at public elections for the purpose of identifying and proving national and state citizenship. YES. This is where I'm at right now I'm with you. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/30/2016 5:37:04 AM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What new categories of business Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
No on all except Amendment 1 and voter ID. The no new tax is fucking stupid. There could be whole new categories of commerce in future years that would be exempt and have massive advantages over legacy businesses. Bad juju. Both tobacco taxes are stupid, #3 taxes the poor so they can pay their kids pre-k (statistically more lower income smoke), and Prop A is just garbage. If we need more road money raise the fuel taxes and put a yearly use tax on EV's. Campaign contribution limits are great for democrats... Not so good for third parties or GOP. What new categories of business Good question. I can't see the future either. ETA - I'll use the example of cars again, we don't have a use tax on EV's right now do we? They put wear and tear on the roads just like every other vehicle but are exempt from paying for them. This is a very bad deal... Furthermore, think about a law like this being enacted 100 years ago. I'm all for limited government, but we shouldn't hamstring our state's future based on our perception of today. Just imagine if the founders had the foresight to add a couple words to #2 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/30/2016 10:20:12 AM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'm with you. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Constitutional Amendment 1 would renew the existing sales and use tax of 0.1 percent for 10 years. NO. Constitutional Amendment 2 would establish limits on campaign contributions to candidates for state or judicial office. YES. Constitutional Amendment 3 would increase the taxes on cigarette packs to 60 cents by 2020. Hell NO and I don't smoke. Constitutional Amendment 4 would prohibit a new state sales or use tax on any service or activity that was not subject to a sales or use tax as of January 1, 2015. Hell YES!! Constitutional Amendment 6 would empower the state government to require the presentation of voter IDs at public elections for the purpose of identifying and proving national and state citizenship. YES. This is where I'm at right now I'm with you. Same here |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/31/2016 7:42:08 AM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Constitutional Amendment 1 would renew the existing sales and use tax of 0.1 percent for 10 years. NO. Constitutional Amendment 2 would establish limits on campaign contributions to candidates for state or judicial office. YES. Constitutional Amendment 3 would increase the taxes on cigarette packs to 60 cents by 2020. Hell NO and I don't smoke. Constitutional Amendment 4 would prohibit a new state sales or use tax on any service or activity that was not subject to a sales or use tax as of January 1, 2015. Hell YES!! Constitutional Amendment 6 would empower the state government to require the presentation of voter IDs at public elections for the purpose of identifying and proving national and state citizenship. YES. This is where I'm at right now We're on the same page about everything but this. You know that Republicans will be the only ones bound by this law. Even if the democrats are caught red-handed violating it, there won't be any (significant) penalties, and nobody in the press will care, so the public won't hear about it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/2/2016 8:57:54 AM EDT
[#11]
Yesterday I turned in my absentee/early ballot to the Jackson County Election Board office.
I've had to show my photo ID TWICE during this process. Not the printed "voter ID" card, not a faceless utility bill, but an actual State-issued photo ID. Once to the Notary when getting my signature on the return envelope notarized (I never knew that was a requirement for the absentee ballot) and again when actually turning in the sealed ballot envelope at the Election Board office This has been just too much of an undue and unfair burden upon me and I feel so oppressed. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/2/2016 7:36:16 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
We're on the same page about everything but this. You know that Republicans will be the only ones bound by this law. Even if the democrats are caught red-handed violating it, there won't be any (significant) penalties, and nobody in the press will care, so the public won't hear about it. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Constitutional Amendment 1 would renew the existing sales and use tax of 0.1 percent for 10 years. NO. Constitutional Amendment 2 would establish limits on campaign contributions to candidates for state or judicial office. YES. Constitutional Amendment 3 would increase the taxes on cigarette packs to 60 cents by 2020. Hell NO and I don't smoke. Constitutional Amendment 4 would prohibit a new state sales or use tax on any service or activity that was not subject to a sales or use tax as of January 1, 2015. Hell YES!! Constitutional Amendment 6 would empower the state government to require the presentation of voter IDs at public elections for the purpose of identifying and proving national and state citizenship. YES. This is where I'm at right now We're on the same page about everything but this. You know that Republicans will be the only ones bound by this law. Even if the democrats are caught red-handed violating it, there won't be any (significant) penalties, and nobody in the press will care, so the public won't hear about it. Bold. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/3/2016 4:36:46 PM EDT
[#13]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/4/2016 10:55:43 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryWrong thread....but 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/7/2016 9:49:13 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Bold. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Constitutional Amendment 1 would renew the existing sales and use tax of 0.1 percent for 10 years. NO. Constitutional Amendment 2 would establish limits on campaign contributions to candidates for state or judicial office. YES. Constitutional Amendment 3 would increase the taxes on cigarette packs to 60 cents by 2020. Hell NO and I don't smoke. Constitutional Amendment 4 would prohibit a new state sales or use tax on any service or activity that was not subject to a sales or use tax as of January 1, 2015. Hell YES!! Constitutional Amendment 6 would empower the state government to require the presentation of voter IDs at public elections for the purpose of identifying and proving national and state citizenship. YES. This is where I'm at right now We're on the same page about everything but this. You know that Republicans will be the only ones bound by this law. Even if the democrats are caught red-handed violating it, there won't be any (significant) penalties, and nobody in the press will care, so the public won't hear about it. Bold. Agreed. Democrats are the ones behind this. You or your organization (NRA for example) should be able to donate whatever you want to whoever you want. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/7/2016 10:00:19 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Good question. I can't see the future either. ETA - I'll use the example of cars again, we don't have a use tax on EV's right now do we? They put wear and tear on the roads just like every other vehicle but are exempt from paying for them. This is a very bad deal... Furthermore, think about a law like this being enacted 100 years ago. I'm all for limited government, but we shouldn't hamstring our state's future based on our perception of today. Just imagine if the founders had the foresight to add a couple words to #2 Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
No on all except Amendment 1 and voter ID. The no new tax is fucking stupid. There could be whole new categories of commerce in future years that would be exempt and have massive advantages over legacy businesses. Bad juju. Both tobacco taxes are stupid, #3 taxes the poor so they can pay their kids pre-k (statistically more lower income smoke), and Prop A is just garbage. If we need more road money raise the fuel taxes and put a yearly use tax on EV's. Campaign contribution limits are great for democrats... Not so good for third parties or GOP. What new categories of business Good question. I can't see the future either. ETA - I'll use the example of cars again, we don't have a use tax on EV's right now do we? They put wear and tear on the roads just like every other vehicle but are exempt from paying for them. This is a very bad deal... Furthermore, think about a law like this being enacted 100 years ago. I'm all for limited government, but we shouldn't hamstring our state's future based on our perception of today. Just imagine if the founders had the foresight to add a couple words to #2 I'm undecided on this one. I generally agree with not raising taxes. I don't want to do anything short sighted, though, especially with the constitution. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/8/2016 6:32:14 AM EDT
[#17]
Judge Tietelmann NO
#1 YES #2 NO #3 NO #4 YES #6 YES A NO |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/9/2016 3:53:37 PM EDT
[#18]
Results.
Shall Judge RICHARD B. TEITELMAN of the Missouri Supreme Court be retained in office? Yes (63.918%)
 |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
