Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Posted: 11/20/2014 2:31:02 AM EDT


The AR-15 rifle, pictured above, is among the weapons banned by the Maryland law. Nearly two dozen states are supporting a legal effort to overturn the assault weapons ban passed in Maryland in the aftermath of the Sandy Hook elementary school shooting.

The law, signed by Gov. Martin O’Malley in May 2013, is among the nation’s strictest gun-control measures, banning magazines that hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition and most semi-automatic rifles, while also mandating fingerprinting and training for some new gun buyers. Violation of the law carries a maximum penalty of three years in prison, a $5,000 fine or both.

The law was challenged by opponents shortly after passage and upheld by a federal judge in August. That decision is currently being appealed before the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, where the 21 states laid out their case against the law in a filing last week. All but a handful of the state attorneys general are Republicans.

In their filing in support of the challengers, the states lay out four arguments, the first of which is that owning the prohibited weapons is constitutionally protected.

“The weapons banned by the Maryland law fall within the protection of the Second Amendment because they are typically possessed for lawful purposes, including the core protected purpose of self-defense,” they argue.

In her August ruling, U.S. District Judge Catherine C. Blake found differently: “The court seriously doubts that the banned assault long guns are commonly possessed for lawful purposes, particularly self-defense in the home, which is at the core of the Second Amendment right, and is inclined to find the weapons fall outside Second Amendment protection as dangerous and unusual.”

Second, the 21 states argue that law “burdens the core right” of law-abiding citizens to defend themselves. In their third argument, the states urge the court to overturn the law because it fails to satisfy the standards courts use to weigh laws that may infringe on constitutional rights. Finally, they argue the August decision mistakenly accepted expert evidence by criminology professor Christopher Koper.


The law is being challenged by nine plaintiffs, including individuals, a retailer and gun rights groups.

The 21 states are: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Florida, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia and Wyoming.


Maryland assault weapons ban upheld in federal court

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/govbeat/wp/2014/11/18/21-states-want-a-court-to-overturn-marylands-post-sandy-hook-assault-weapons-ban/
Link Posted: 11/20/2014 10:25:43 AM EDT
[#1]
I go to a shoot the day after Thanksgiving every year with about 30 people. 10 years ago when I first went, I was the only one with an AR.

Last year, there were at least 20. I'd say they are "common".


I fully expect to start seeing more suppressors.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top