Quoted:
Update: Additional bills introduced 2/4/13
HF 307: 1/2 of the end of "shall issue": Adds the chief of police to authorities that can grant permits to carry, and requires you to go to your chief of police if you have one, instead of to the sheriff. Working with HF 294, this will end the "shall issue" permit system in Minnesota. The sole author is Rep. Simonson out of Duluth.
HF294: The other 1/2 of the end of "shall issue" On the face of it, this bill would make it more difficult for felons to have their right to own firearms restored. But is also lowers the bar for denying a permit to carry. Currently, a permit must be granted if the applicant is qualified, unless there is a
substantial likelihood that the applicant is a danger to self or the public. This bill removes the word "substantial," thereby lowering the showing that has to be made for an issuing authority to deny a permit. If you appeal the denial, the burden of proof on the denying authority would be lowered from "clear and convincing" to "preponderance of the evidence." In lawyer-speak, that is a HUGE change. Also, incidents of alleged criminal misconduct that
have never even been investigated or documented can be used against you in the appeal hearing. The end result is a system where you could be denied a permit to carry because the issuing authority says "well, we heard...but we didn't document or investigate" or "well, we think...but we didn't document or investigate." When combined with HF307, this is the end of the carry permit for many Minnesotans.
HF 298: End state preemption: This would end state preemption of local gun restrictions. We would then have a patchwork of different laws from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, making it impossible to know all the laws and travel legally through the state with a firearm.
HF 285: This is small, but significant. It adds a definition for "ammunition" in the section of statutes that deal with firearms definitions. It goes on to make so that if you cannot possess a firearm, you also can't possess ammo. The real kicker here is more subtle; it alters the list of those that can't possess firearms or ammunition. Under current law, you cannot be denied the right to own a firearm for mental health reasons until you have been committed in Minnesota or another state. If this passes, you lose the right if you are ordered, regardless of whether the order is stayed. In other words, a court could commit someone, realize that a mistake was made, and stay the order, but it would be too late; the subject of the order couldn't own a gun or firearms until they had petitioned to have rights restored. All in all, this is probably the least concerning of the bills that has been introduced.
These representatives are trying to roll back every right we have. No more permits to carry. De facto bans on most semi-automatic guns through either the ban or the ultra-low magazine limits that make it impossible to use your gun. PLEASE STAY INVOLVED!