There's been some confusion as to the marking regulations for Title I & II firearms (I mean in general, not specifically here). Hopefully, we all know that a Title I firearm, made by an individual, is not required to have markings until the time at which it is sold. Recently, some gobbledygook has come about to question whether or not a Form 1
maker is required to add additional markings to a Title II firearm.
The
only regulation that specifies marking requirements for a
maker is § 479.102 (§ 478.92 specifies licensed Mfrs and Importers). I'll break it down to the pertinent parts and delve from there
a. You, as a manufacturer, importer, or
maker of a firearm, must legibly identify the firearm as follows:
(leaving out this part as we all know what it says, but what it doesn't say is
when the marking must take place)
e. A firearm frame or receiver that is not a component part of a complete weapon at the time it is sold, shipped, or otherwise disposed of by you must be identified as required by this section.
f.1. Any part defined as a machine gun, muffler, or silencer for the purposes of this part that is not a component part of a complete firearm at the time it is sold, shipped, or otherwise disposed of by you must be identified as required by this section.
(Why would you need to specify parts E&F if it was known that a firearm must always be marked? Or for that matter, why is it that a homemade Title I can be left bare if this reg exists? Again, nowhere does this regulation state
when a firearm must be marked, unless it is being sold/shipped/disposed)
You can go
Here and read the ATF's response to "When does a receiver need to have markings and/or serial numbers?". It points to § 478.92, which only applies to licensed Mfr's and Importers.
With respect to the ATF/NFA Handbook, it is not law and it even says so in the first sentence of the second paragraph, on the first page.
Yes, yes, ATF (aka GOD) can do what they want and take you to court yada yada. No, I'm not going to lawyer up and fight them. This is a discussion so if that's the only thing you have to say, well, you don't have much.
Yes, it's my fault for reading their laws and holding them to the word.
With regard to my previous comments, I was merely focusing on the written law and the way ATF has interpreted it, along with their inability to hold this to a constant. I fully agree that marking your firearms is a responsible thing to do, regardless of law.
As for where the marking must be for an SBR, anything can be put on the barrel, but the Serial
must be on the receiver and should already be there.