User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 10/10/2014 7:14:53 PM EDT
Yay.
I guess I'll go and ask him his position on securing the border and illegal immigration (hint for those of you considering voting for him - he supports open borders and says that we should "welcome immigrants of all skill levels"). Hopefully no VCDL members fall for his nonsense. Not that I'm all that excited about Ed Gillespie....but we need to get Warner out of there. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/28/2012 5:52:36 PM EDT
[#1]
Topic Moved
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/10/2014 8:42:32 PM EDT
[#2]
In my absence, please give him one helluva super atomic wedgy.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/10/2014 9:07:52 PM EDT
[#3]
Tell him to FU from me. I left the North to get away from mealy-mouthed cock gobbler politicians like him.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/10/2014 10:57:38 PM EDT
[#4]
Ask him how much the dems are paying him this time.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/11/2014 1:30:13 AM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Ask him how much the dems are paying him this time. +1 Wouldn't vote for him for dog catcher. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/11/2014 7:37:16 AM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Ask him how much the dems are paying him this time. This....He a Dem shill. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/11/2014 8:50:21 AM EDT
[#7]
Can you ask that LINO fuck him how a libertarian can support a carbon tax and advocate for the central government placing tracking devices in personal automobiles?
K, thanks. As for "getting Warner out of there," he's in for life. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/11/2014 9:01:19 AM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Tell him FU from me. I left the North to get away from mealy-mouthed cock gobbler gun grabbing paycheck stealing politicians like him. Add me to this pile, slightly modified quote. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/11/2014 9:24:45 AM EDT
[#9]
I see it's still easier to rag on Sarvis (not a fan of him at all), while conveniently forgetting the Republicans aren't able to field an electable candidate....
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/11/2014 10:26:17 AM EDT
[#10]
I'll just be honest, I don't know anything about this guy. And I assume you're talking about the VCDL Annandale meeting on the 23rd? I've never been to a meeting, I should probably go to one.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/11/2014 12:54:33 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I see it's still easier to rag on Sarvis (not a fan of him at all), while conveniently forgetting the Republicans aren't able to field an electable candidate.... As I said above, I'm not a huge Ed Gillespie fan, but by most standards of "electability", Ed Gillespie is about as "electable" as you can get. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/11/2014 7:07:23 PM EDT
[#12]
fuck sarvis
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/11/2014 7:13:55 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Tell him to FU from me. I left the North to get away from mealy-mouthed cock gobbler politicians like him. Ditto. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/11/2014 11:01:26 PM EDT
[#14]
You mean Sarvis, the I lost as a Republican so I took my ball and went home, came back as a Libertarian, lost and f'ed the Old Dominion while doing it, now I'm back a second time as a Libertarian to do it again? That Sarvis?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/11/2014 11:14:36 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You mean Sarvis, the I lost as a Republican so I took my ball and went home, came back as a Libertarian, lost and f'ed the Old Dominion while doing it, now I'm back a second time as a Libertarian to do it again? That Sarvis? That's the one. Let's make sure no one on our side falls for that nonsense a second time. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/11/2014 11:16:00 PM EDT
[#16]
Quoted:
Yay.
I guess I'll go and ask him his position on securing the border and illegal immigration (hint for those of you considering voting for him - he supports open borders and says that we should "welcome immigrants of all skill levels"). Hopefully no VCDL members fall for his nonsense. Not that I'm all that excited about Ed Gillespie....but we need to get Warner out of there. The idiots posting on the VCDL Facebook page are falling over themselves for Sarvis because he's the only one who sent in the vcdl's survey. Like thas the only thing that matters, sure its important but there's a lot more at stake. Not that it matters as Warner will safely win. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/11/2014 11:37:13 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
fuck sarvis |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/12/2014 3:07:45 AM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
fuck sarvis |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/12/2014 2:58:00 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The idiots posting on the VCDL Facebook page are falling over themselves for Sarvis because he's the only one who sent in the vcdl's survey. Like thas the only thing that matters, sure its important but there's a lot more at stake. Not that it matters as Warner will safely win. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Yay.
I guess I'll go and ask him his position on securing the border and illegal immigration (hint for those of you considering voting for him - he supports open borders and says that we should "welcome immigrants of all skill levels"). Hopefully no VCDL members fall for his nonsense. Not that I'm all that excited about Ed Gillespie....but we need to get Warner out of there. The idiots posting on the VCDL Facebook page are falling over themselves for Sarvis because he's the only one who sent in the vcdl's survey. Like thas the only thing that matters, sure its important but there's a lot more at stake. Not that it matters as Warner will safely win. Although I recognize that there are both positive and negative aspects to this, one of the reasons I think that tyranny is steadily winning out over liberty is that those who favor tyranny are willing to vote for stealth candidates who they know will vote for tyranny but don't wear it on their sleeve. We are not willing to vote for people who we believe will vote our way but aren't willing to advertise it during the campaign. Note that I am not saying that Gillespie would be another Ted Cruz - I recognize he is a milquetoast Chamber of Commerce-type Republican. But I do think he would vote more our way than Warner. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/12/2014 3:23:32 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
...came back as a Libertarian, lost and f'ed the Old Dominion while doing it... Your math skills when it comes to the last gubenatorial election fail. Sarvis didn't get enough votes to swing the election had all those votes gone to Cooch the Papist. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/12/2014 3:26:14 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
...the only one who sent in the vcdl's survey. Like thas the only thing that matters, sure its important but there's a lot more at stake. Not that it matters as Warner will safely win. And anything other than those questions are supposed to be outside the scope of the mission of VCDL. When you hear a PAC say they couldn't endorse a candidate because they thought someone else would win, it's time to start spending your support money elsewhere. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/12/2014 10:12:47 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Your math skills when it comes to the last gubenatorial election fail. Sarvis didn't get enough votes to swing the election had all those votes gone to Cooch the Papist. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
...came back as a Libertarian, lost and f'ed the Old Dominion while doing it... Your math skills when it comes to the last gubenatorial election fail. Sarvis didn't get enough votes to swing the election had all those votes gone to Cooch the Papist. He absolutely got enough votes to swing the election; 145,000 votes in an election won by 55,000. The debate is which regions he drew more from the D or the R. Honestly it's the over blown crap, kinda like what you are doing that gave us the worst possible outcome. Live and learn......or not 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/12/2014 11:58:49 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
He absolutely got enough votes to swing the election; 145,000 votes in an election won by 55,000. The debate is which regions he drew more from the D or the R. Honestly it's the over blown crap, kinda like what you are doing that gave us the worst possible outcome. Live and learn......or not
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
...came back as a Libertarian, lost and f'ed the Old Dominion while doing it... Your math skills when it comes to the last gubenatorial election fail. Sarvis didn't get enough votes to swing the election had all those votes gone to Cooch the Papist. He absolutely got enough votes to swing the election; 145,000 votes in an election won by 55,000. The debate is which regions he drew more from the D or the R. Honestly it's the over blown crap, kinda like what you are doing that gave us the worst possible outcome. Live and learn......or not
You are assuming that all or even half of his votes would have went to Cuccinelli. Fact is, more Republican voters stayed home in this race than turned out in the last one. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/13/2014 8:50:07 AM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You are assuming that all or even half of his votes would have went to Cuccinelli. Fact is, more Republican voters stayed home in this race than turned out in the last one. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
...came back as a Libertarian, lost and f'ed the Old Dominion while doing it... Your math skills when it comes to the last gubenatorial election fail. Sarvis didn't get enough votes to swing the election had all those votes gone to Cooch the Papist. He absolutely got enough votes to swing the election; 145,000 votes in an election won by 55,000. The debate is which regions he drew more from the D or the R. Honestly it's the over blown crap, kinda like what you are doing that gave us the worst possible outcome. Live and learn......or not
You are assuming that all or even half of his votes would have went to Cuccinelli. Fact is, more Republican voters stayed home in this race than turned out in the last one. I agree, when the Repub machine doesn't even stand by their guy why will their lap dogs? I was responding to the hypothetical statement above, which is simply wrong and silly to call out another member on. Furthermore, that lil dig at Cuch, even a year later shows why we get our butts kicked in elections. We should be more disappointed in the Republic Machine then Cuch, but hey that war on women crap is what some want to believe. So it's Cuch's fault and the Republicans will do better next time 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/13/2014 9:23:37 AM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
fuck sarvis ^this... |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/13/2014 9:36:47 AM EDT
[#26]
Is anyone going to this meeting?
EDIT: Why is this post showing as invisible? |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/13/2014 7:56:41 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The idiots posting on the VCDL Facebook page are falling over themselves for Sarvis because he's the only one who sent in the vcdl's survey. Like thas the only thing that matters, sure its important but there's a lot more at stake. Not that it matters as Warner will safely win. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Yay.
I guess I'll go and ask him his position on securing the border and illegal immigration (hint for those of you considering voting for him - he supports open borders and says that we should "welcome immigrants of all skill levels"). Hopefully no VCDL members fall for his nonsense. Not that I'm all that excited about Ed Gillespie....but we need to get Warner out of there. The idiots posting on the VCDL Facebook page are falling over themselves for Sarvis because he's the only one who sent in the vcdl's survey. Like thas the only thing that matters, sure its important but there's a lot more at stake. Not that it matters as Warner will safely win. Yeah... given his past, I'm pretty sure he's they type who will say anything someone wanted to hear just to get an endorsement. So desperate to be elected to something. Anything. Just elected. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/13/2014 7:59:36 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Is anyone going to this meeting? EDIT: Why is this post showing as invisible? What do you mean invisible? Did you accidentally ignore yourself?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/13/2014 8:14:55 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yeah... given his past, I'm pretty sure he's they type who will say anything someone wanted to hear just to get an endorsement. So desperate to be elected to something. Anything. Just elected. DING DING DING!!!! |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/13/2014 8:55:17 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What do you mean invisible? Did you accidentally ignore yourself? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Is anyone going to this meeting? EDIT: Why is this post showing as invisible? What do you mean invisible? Did you accidentally ignore yourself? Yeah, who knows. I saw I replied but didn't see my reply! Long night. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/14/2014 7:27:53 PM EDT
[#31]
I don't blame Sarvis. I blame the tools that voted for him or didn't even vote at all.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/15/2014 11:10:22 AM EDT
[#32]
I haven't studied up on Gillespie yet. Figure he's the only shot at getting warner out so I'll be voting for him regardless. Anyone have a quick rundown for me?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/15/2014 12:21:29 PM EDT
[#33]
So now that Warner is tainted with the Puckett corruption investigation will the state propaganda agencies pin him to the cross over it like they did to Cooch and Bob?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/15/2014 5:05:21 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So now that Warner is tainted with the Puckett corruption investigation will the state propaganda agencies pin him to the cross over it like they did to Cooch and Bob? You mean the not trying to hide their liberal bias media rake Warner over the coals? Hold your breath.... |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/15/2014 5:22:37 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I haven't studied up on Gillespie yet. Figure he's the only shot at getting warner out so I'll be voting for him regardless. Anyone have a quick rundown for me? I will be voting for him, just to vote against Warner. But who in the blue fuck in the VA GOP decided that someone with his baggage (Enron) would be the ideal candidate to go after Warner?   I'm of the opinion that a primary rather than a convention might weed out some of the more obvious GOP miscues.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/15/2014 5:34:22 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I will be voting for him, just to vote against Warner. But who in the blue fuck in the VA GOP decided that someone with his baggage (Enron) would be the ideal candidate to go after Warner?
I'm of the opinion that a primary rather than a convention might weed out some of the more obvious GOP miscues. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I haven't studied up on Gillespie yet. Figure he's the only shot at getting warner out so I'll be voting for him regardless. Anyone have a quick rundown for me? I will be voting for him, just to vote against Warner. But who in the blue fuck in the VA GOP decided that someone with his baggage (Enron) would be the ideal candidate to go after Warner?
I'm of the opinion that a primary rather than a convention might weed out some of the more obvious GOP miscues. Really? Something that is over a decade ago is still relevant and where is the trail that ties him directly to doing evil things for Enron? He worked for a company that worked for a shitty company. Yeah it is an albatross.....
There are other reasons to dislike him but Enron is the democrats throwing shit at the wall and hoping something sticks. Really don't see it working very good. how many people actually remember who or what enron was. I would wager not many with the attention span of our citizenry. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/15/2014 5:41:22 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Really? Something that is over a decade ago is still relevant and where is the trail that ties him directly to doing evil things for Enron? He worked for a company that worked for a shitty company. Yeah it is an albatross..... There are other reasons to dislike him but Enron is the democrats throwing shit at the wall and hoping something sticks. Really don't see it working very good. how many people actually remember who or what enron was. I would wager not many with the attention span of our citizenry. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: I haven't studied up on Gillespie yet. Figure he's the only shot at getting warner out so I'll be voting for him regardless. Anyone have a quick rundown for me? I will be voting for him, just to vote against Warner. But who in the blue fuck in the VA GOP decided that someone with his baggage (Enron) would be the ideal candidate to go after Warner? I'm of the opinion that a primary rather than a convention might weed out some of the more obvious GOP miscues. Really? Something that is over a decade ago is still relevant and where is the trail that ties him directly to doing evil things for Enron? He worked for a company that worked for a shitty company. Yeah it is an albatross..... There are other reasons to dislike him but Enron is the democrats throwing shit at the wall and hoping something sticks. Really don't see it working very good. how many people actually remember who or what enron was. I would wager not many with the attention span of our citizenry. In conversations with other people in this area, the Enron thing IS sticking. And, it should have been known to be a probable sore point prior to his being the nominee. Furthermore, most people over the age of 30 will know about and remember Enron. That's a large percentage of potential voters. Financially, it was a big event that was kept in the news a long time.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/15/2014 7:53:48 PM EDT
[#38]
Yeah I'm 24 and somewhat remember enron being in the news a bunch but I didn't pay attention to what was going on in the world then. The news used to bore me to tears now it just raises my blood pressure... |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/17/2014 9:06:51 AM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The idiots posting on the VCDL Facebook page are falling over themselves for Sarvis because he's the only one who sent in the vcdl's survey. Like thas the only thing that matters, sure its important but there's a lot more at stake. Not that it matters as Warner will safely win. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Yay.
I guess I'll go and ask him his position on securing the border and illegal immigration (hint for those of you considering voting for him - he supports open borders and says that we should "welcome immigrants of all skill levels"). Hopefully no VCDL members fall for his nonsense. Not that I'm all that excited about Ed Gillespie....but we need to get Warner out of there. The idiots posting on the VCDL Facebook page are falling over themselves for Sarvis because he's the only one who sent in the vcdl's survey. Like thas the only thing that matters, sure its important but there's a lot more at stake. Not that it matters as Warner will safely win. Maybe hubby & I need to go. I heard all that crap last year, when I stumped for Cucc (I'm a libertarian). I had to fight that at each door I knocked on. Pissed me off how ignorant people were about Sarvis & his big gov't schtick. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/17/2014 9:13:43 AM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I agree, when the Repub machine doesn't even stand by their guy why will their lap dogs? I was responding to the hypothetical statement above, which is simply wrong and silly to call out another member on. Furthermore, that lil dig at Cuch, even a year later shows why we get our butts kicked in elections. We should be more disappointed in the Republic Machine then Cuch, but hey that war on women crap is what some want to believe. So it's Cuch's fault and the Republicans will do better next time
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
...came back as a Libertarian, lost and f'ed the Old Dominion while doing it... Your math skills when it comes to the last gubenatorial election fail. Sarvis didn't get enough votes to swing the election had all those votes gone to Cooch the Papist. He absolutely got enough votes to swing the election; 145,000 votes in an election won by 55,000. The debate is which regions he drew more from the D or the R. Honestly it's the over blown crap, kinda like what you are doing that gave us the worst possible outcome. Live and learn......or not
You are assuming that all or even half of his votes would have went to Cuccinelli. Fact is, more Republican voters stayed home in this race than turned out in the last one. I agree, when the Repub machine doesn't even stand by their guy why will their lap dogs? I was responding to the hypothetical statement above, which is simply wrong and silly to call out another member on. Furthermore, that lil dig at Cuch, even a year later shows why we get our butts kicked in elections. We should be more disappointed in the Republic Machine then Cuch, but hey that war on women crap is what some want to believe. So it's Cuch's fault and the Republicans will do better next time
Yes, like when Bob Bolling came out in support of McAuliffe? How are we supposed to get the base out to vote when even the Rs are acting like spoiled children (I'll just pick the other team, then) or monarchy (I'm next in line)? We have heard for YEARS that we need to come together for the RINOs running, but the RINOs don't do it for more conservative Rs. F* that, I may vote for RINOs here & there, but good luck getting me out when I'm being bullied. Why should I? Cucc was a great candidate, and he got SCREWED. Yeah, that fosters a lot of warm fuzzies among the base. And I'm not even a Republican or religious conservative, but I certainly see the base's point here. If Rs have to come together, then it's All or Nothing, people. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/17/2014 10:15:19 AM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Maybe hubby & I need to go. I heard all that crap last year, when I stumped for Cucc (I'm a libertarian). I had to fight that at each door I knocked on. Pissed me off how ignorant people were about Sarvis & his big gov't schtick. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Yay.
I guess I'll go and ask him his position on securing the border and illegal immigration (hint for those of you considering voting for him - he supports open borders and says that we should "welcome immigrants of all skill levels"). Hopefully no VCDL members fall for his nonsense. Not that I'm all that excited about Ed Gillespie....but we need to get Warner out of there. The idiots posting on the VCDL Facebook page are falling over themselves for Sarvis because he's the only one who sent in the vcdl's survey. Like thas the only thing that matters, sure its important but there's a lot more at stake. Not that it matters as Warner will safely win. Maybe hubby & I need to go. I heard all that crap last year, when I stumped for Cucc (I'm a libertarian). I had to fight that at each door I knocked on. Pissed me off how ignorant people were about Sarvis & his big gov't schtick. If you guys go let me know. I'm going and have never been. It will be nice to say hi to someone. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/17/2014 3:56:34 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yes, like when Bob Bolling came out in support of McAuliffe? How are we supposed to get the base out to vote when even the Rs are acting like spoiled children (I'll just pick the other team, then) or monarchy (I'm next in line)? We have heard for YEARS that we need to come together for the RINOs running, but the RINOs don't do it for more conservative Rs. F* that, I may vote for RINOs here & there, but good luck getting me out when I'm being bullied. Why should I? Cucc was a great candidate, and he got SCREWED. Yeah, that fosters a lot of warm fuzzies among the base. And I'm not even a Republican or religious conservative, but I certainly see the base's point here. If Rs have to come together, then it's All or Nothing, people. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I agree, when the Repub machine doesn't even stand by their guy why will their lap dogs? I was responding to the hypothetical statement above, which is simply wrong and silly to call out another member on. Furthermore, that lil dig at Cuch, even a year later shows why we get our butts kicked in elections. We should be more disappointed in the Republic Machine then Cuch, but hey that war on women crap is what some want to believe. So it's Cuch's fault and the Republicans will do better next time
Yes, like when Bob Bolling came out in support of McAuliffe? How are we supposed to get the base out to vote when even the Rs are acting like spoiled children (I'll just pick the other team, then) or monarchy (I'm next in line)? We have heard for YEARS that we need to come together for the RINOs running, but the RINOs don't do it for more conservative Rs. F* that, I may vote for RINOs here & there, but good luck getting me out when I'm being bullied. Why should I? Cucc was a great candidate, and he got SCREWED. Yeah, that fosters a lot of warm fuzzies among the base. And I'm not even a Republican or religious conservative, but I certainly see the base's point here. If Rs have to come together, then it's All or Nothing, people. Sadly, I feel us independents are inherently more Republican in values then the Republican establishment. This Cuch was a bad selection posting crap needs to actually be explained or just stop. The governor loss was clearly on the Republican Party abandoning someone who didn't tote the RINO line. Sarvis supporters are just largely uniformed people trying to break away from the failing 2 party system, but blind to the better candidate. It should be clear Sarvis is not Libertarian. The VCDL is being professional to entertain any politician that will discuss the 2A, but seeing this reinvigorated Sarvis love reminds me that even a fool can own a gun. May we one day step away from life's distractions and begin to understand what we vote for. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/17/2014 7:11:26 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Sadly, I feel us independents are inherently more Republican in values then the Republican establishment. This Cuch was a bad selection posting crap needs to actually be explained or just stop. The governor loss was clearly on the Republican Party abandoning someone who didn't tote the RINO line. Sarvis supporters are just largely uniformed people trying to break away from the failing 2 party system, but blind to the better candidate. It should be clear Sarvis is not Libertarian. The VCDL is being professional to entertain any politician that will discuss the 2A, but seeing this reinvigorated Sarvis love reminds me that even a fool can own a gun. May we one day step away from life's distractions and begin to understand what we vote for. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: I agree, when the Repub machine doesn't even stand by their guy why will their lap dogs? I was responding to the hypothetical statement above, which is simply wrong and silly to call out another member on. Furthermore, that lil dig at Cuch, even a year later shows why we get our butts kicked in elections. We should be more disappointed in the Republic Machine then Cuch, but hey that war on women crap is what some want to believe. So it's Cuch's fault and the Republicans will do better next time Yes, like when Bob Bolling came out in support of McAuliffe? How are we supposed to get the base out to vote when even the Rs are acting like spoiled children (I'll just pick the other team, then) or monarchy (I'm next in line)? We have heard for YEARS that we need to come together for the RINOs running, but the RINOs don't do it for more conservative Rs. F* that, I may vote for RINOs here & there, but good luck getting me out when I'm being bullied. Why should I? Cucc was a great candidate, and he got SCREWED. Yeah, that fosters a lot of warm fuzzies among the base. And I'm not even a Republican or religious conservative, but I certainly see the base's point here. If Rs have to come together, then it's All or Nothing, people. Sadly, I feel us independents are inherently more Republican in values then the Republican establishment. This Cuch was a bad selection posting crap needs to actually be explained or just stop. The governor loss was clearly on the Republican Party abandoning someone who didn't tote the RINO line. Sarvis supporters are just largely uniformed people trying to break away from the failing 2 party system, but blind to the better candidate. It should be clear Sarvis is not Libertarian. The VCDL is being professional to entertain any politician that will discuss the 2A, but seeing this reinvigorated Sarvis love reminds me that even a fool can own a gun. May we one day step away from life's distractions and begin to understand what we vote for. Well said.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/17/2014 9:04:32 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If you guys go let me know. I'm going and have never been. It will be nice to say hi to someone. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Yay.
I guess I'll go and ask him his position on securing the border and illegal immigration (hint for those of you considering voting for him - he supports open borders and says that we should "welcome immigrants of all skill levels"). Hopefully no VCDL members fall for his nonsense. Not that I'm all that excited about Ed Gillespie....but we need to get Warner out of there. The idiots posting on the VCDL Facebook page are falling over themselves for Sarvis because he's the only one who sent in the vcdl's survey. Like thas the only thing that matters, sure its important but there's a lot more at stake. Not that it matters as Warner will safely win. Maybe hubby & I need to go. I heard all that crap last year, when I stumped for Cucc (I'm a libertarian). I had to fight that at each door I knocked on. Pissed me off how ignorant people were about Sarvis & his big gov't schtick. If you guys go let me know. I'm going and have never been. It will be nice to say hi to someone. I'll be there - tall white guy in a tie with an HK on the left hand side. For those who don't normally go, I highly recommend it. It's an informative time, and, if nothing else, it's nice to know that you're not alone out there in your views (particularly in this part of the state). Also can't emphasize enough the need to mark your calendars to attend LOBBY DAY, on Martin Luther King Day down in Richmond. We have normally enjoyed a huge numbers advantage over the antis, but there was no ignoring the fact that last year they brought a lot of people. Perhaps not as many as us, but it was closer than normal. For the R's in deep red parts of the state and the D's in deep blue parts of the state, the numbers that show up on Lobby Day probably don't make much difference in how they vote on legislation. But for R's holding on to seats in purple parts of the state (and the one or two D's holding onto seats in purple parts of the state), the numbers of people that show up on Lobby Day can make a difference. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/18/2014 11:56:20 AM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'll be there - tall white guy in a tie with an HK on the left hand side. For those who don't normally go, I highly recommend it. It's an informative time, and, if nothing else, it's nice to know that you're not alone out there in your views (particularly in this part of the state). Also can't emphasize enough the need to mark your calendars to attend LOBBY DAY, on Martin Luther King Day down in Richmond. We have normally enjoyed a huge numbers advantage over the antis, but there was no ignoring the fact that last year they brought a lot of people. Perhaps not as many as us, but it was closer than normal. For the R's in deep red parts of the state and the D's in deep blue parts of the state, the numbers that show up on Lobby Day probably don't make much difference in how they vote on legislation. But for R's holding on to seats in purple parts of the state (and the one or two D's holding onto seats in purple parts of the state), the numbers of people that show up on Lobby Day can make a difference. Not too accustomed to getting close enough to a guy OC'ing to examine his gun. Just doesn't seem like it will end well for me. 
And I bet if I approach any tall white guys (I'm 5'8" - everyones tall) and I say "liberty for all?" they will all probably say "fuck yea!".
But I'll give it a shot. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/18/2014 3:43:56 PM EDT
[#46]
Just saw a post on a Facebook gun trading group where someone asked if Gilespie was pro gun. One of the comments was a Savis supporter. While i think Sarvis will have very little impact (Warner is a prick who has his seat for life) it's sad to see people who think he is a real libertarian.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/18/2014 4:12:32 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
it's sad to see people who think he is a real libertarian. well said |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/18/2014 7:47:51 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'll be there - tall white guy in a tie with an HK on the left hand side. For those who don't normally go, I highly recommend it. It's an informative time, and, if nothing else, it's nice to know that you're not alone out there in your views (particularly in this part of the state). Also can't emphasize enough the need to mark your calendars to attend LOBBY DAY, on Martin Luther King Day down in Richmond. We have normally enjoyed a huge numbers advantage over the antis, but there was no ignoring the fact that last year they brought a lot of people. Perhaps not as many as us, but it was closer than normal. For the R's in deep red parts of the state and the D's in deep blue parts of the state, the numbers that show up on Lobby Day probably don't make much difference in how they vote on legislation. But for R's holding on to seats in purple parts of the state (and the one or two D's holding onto seats in purple parts of the state), the numbers of people that show up on Lobby Day can make a difference. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Yay.
I guess I'll go and ask him his position on securing the border and illegal immigration (hint for those of you considering voting for him - he supports open borders and says that we should "welcome immigrants of all skill levels"). Hopefully no VCDL members fall for his nonsense. Not that I'm all that excited about Ed Gillespie....but we need to get Warner out of there. The idiots posting on the VCDL Facebook page are falling over themselves for Sarvis because he's the only one who sent in the vcdl's survey. Like thas the only thing that matters, sure its important but there's a lot more at stake. Not that it matters as Warner will safely win. Maybe hubby & I need to go. I heard all that crap last year, when I stumped for Cucc (I'm a libertarian). I had to fight that at each door I knocked on. Pissed me off how ignorant people were about Sarvis & his big gov't schtick. If you guys go let me know. I'm going and have never been. It will be nice to say hi to someone. I'll be there - tall white guy in a tie with an HK on the left hand side. For those who don't normally go, I highly recommend it. It's an informative time, and, if nothing else, it's nice to know that you're not alone out there in your views (particularly in this part of the state). Also can't emphasize enough the need to mark your calendars to attend LOBBY DAY, on Martin Luther King Day down in Richmond. We have normally enjoyed a huge numbers advantage over the antis, but there was no ignoring the fact that last year they brought a lot of people. Perhaps not as many as us, but it was closer than normal. For the R's in deep red parts of the state and the D's in deep blue parts of the state, the numbers that show up on Lobby Day probably don't make much difference in how they vote on legislation. But for R's holding on to seats in purple parts of the state (and the one or two D's holding onto seats in purple parts of the state), the numbers of people that show up on Lobby Day can make a difference. Hubby said he's not going to the Sarvis thing this Thursday, but we've gone to LOBBY DAY the last two years. PLEASE CONSIDER ATTENDING. It's more important than ever!!! Hubby believes my carjacking story about my BIL with our state senator single-handedly stopped certain anti legislation getting through 2 years ago. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/25/2014 3:55:22 PM EDT
[#49]
Did anybody go to the meeting? What did the LINO douche have to say for himself?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/25/2014 11:38:47 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Did anybody go to the meeting? What did the LINO douche have to say for himself? I didn't even bother asking him any questions - he did enough damage to himself with his talk. He is one of the most genuinely unlikeable people I have ever met. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
