User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 2/1/2016 10:24:51 PM EDT
Finally did it, got rid of my 300 because I wasn't happy with the caliber performance. Went back to tried and true 223.
I'll have to mate it with my lower once I'm off work.  </a>" />
Edt: 7.5 ballistic advantage 9.5 geissele mk 8 Kx5 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/2/2016 8:17:18 AM EDT
[#1]
Looks excellent. What aspects of the 300 where you not satisfied with?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/2/2016 11:17:36 AM EDT
[#2]
Looks good, specs?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/2/2016 11:42:38 AM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Looks excellent. What aspects of the 300 where you not satisfied with? This. Mine is a killing machine. $1/round is not fun though. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/2/2016 12:35:53 PM EDT
[#4]
Looks good. How do you like the rail, I've been dying that for my next sbr.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/2/2016 12:42:30 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
This. Mine is a killing machine. $1/round is not fun though. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Looks excellent. What aspects of the 300 where you not satisfied with? This. Mine is a killing machine. $1/round is not fun though. Not to hijack OP's thread, but what ammo would you recommend for hogs? I've got a bunch of the Remington 220 gr subs and 120 gr supers because I can find them local and relatively inexpensive but my understanding is the 220's don't perform very well. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/2/2016 12:53:55 PM EDT
[#6]
My original build was 8.5 noveske barrel, shooting 220 subs. Anything inside 100 I had about 3" groups. At 200 yds it would open to about 14". I do not hunt, I target shoot, and for what my purpose if it was not good. I did try supers, it was about 7" group, but that's still not good to me. Plus expensive, I was shooting Remington if that matters.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/2/2016 12:55:17 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Not to hijack OP's thread, but what ammo would you recommend for hogs? I've got a bunch of the Remington 220 gr subs and 120 gr supers because I can find them local and relatively inexpensive but my understanding is the 220's don't perform very well. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Looks excellent. What aspects of the 300 where you not satisfied with? This. Mine is a killing machine. $1/round is not fun though. Not to hijack OP's thread, but what ammo would you recommend for hogs? I've got a bunch of the Remington 220 gr subs and 120 gr supers because I can find them local and relatively inexpensive but my understanding is the 220's don't perform very well. I use Barnes 110. There is also Hoghammer 130. I think Barnes is also making a 120 also. The Rem/220 sucks for hunting, and sucks for accuracy too. Mine was 6-8 MOA. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/2/2016 1:16:42 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
My original build was 8.5 noveske barrel, shooting 220 subs. Anything inside 100 I had about 3" groups. At 200 yds it would open to about 14". I do not hunt, I target shoot, and for what my purpose if it was not good. I did try supers, it was about 7" group, but that's still not good to me. Plus expensive, I was shooting Remington if that matters. What sight/scope setup? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/2/2016 1:40:47 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What sight/scope setup? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
My original build was 8.5 noveske barrel, shooting 220 subs. Anything inside 100 I had about 3" groups. At 200 yds it would open to about 14". I do not hunt, I target shoot, and for what my purpose if it was not good. I did try supers, it was about 7" group, but that's still not good to me. Plus expensive, I was shooting Remington if that matters. What sight/scope setup? This razor |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/2/2016 10:44:41 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I use Barnes 110. There is also Hoghammer 130. I think Barnes is also making a 120 also. The Rem/220 sucks for hunting, and sucks for accuracy too. Mine was 6-8 MOA. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Looks excellent. What aspects of the 300 where you not satisfied with? This. Mine is a killing machine. $1/round is not fun though. Not to hijack OP's thread, but what ammo would you recommend for hogs? I've got a bunch of the Remington 220 gr subs and 120 gr supers because I can find them local and relatively inexpensive but my understanding is the 220's don't perform very well. I use Barnes 110. There is also Hoghammer 130. I think Barnes is also making a 120 also. The Rem/220 sucks for hunting, and sucks for accuracy too. Mine was 6-8 MOA. Thanks |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
