User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 3/22/2015 3:27:53 PM EDT
[#1]
Charles did a great job on my 870!
Thank you!! |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/23/2015 10:50:39 AM EDT
[#2]
Great job on two stripped AR lowers.
Thanks! |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/28/2015 11:11:11 AM EDT
[#3]
Just got my SCAR 17 back, very nice job as usual! Almost looks factory, huh?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/2/2015 1:16:48 PM EDT
[#4]
Another +1 to CS223. Fast turn around and quality work. Below, I've attached a picture of the engraving, with my trust name and city removed. There's less than 0.9" of usable width on the front magwell, so my city and state abbreviation wouldn't fit on one line. Instead, Charles was able to make everything fit by putting the city and state onto two separate lines and having each fully spelled out. I had the caliber engraved on the receiver as well since my barrel caliber marking will not be readily visible once my handguard is installed.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/6/2015 1:56:12 PM EDT
[#5]
Another satisfied customer here. Slight delayed which Charles communicated to me. (Still less than 10 days door to door which is good in my book.)
Was able to do the trigger guard on a billet lower, which was more work for him. Definitely the nicest job and service I've dealt with as far as engraving goes. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/19/2015 2:53:50 PM EDT
[#6]
Question about the city/state.
Is that where you currently reside? My trust doesn't have a location. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/19/2015 5:30:05 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Question about the city/state. Is that where you currently reside? My trust doesn't have a location. It actually doesn't have anything to do with where you reside, or your trust. The statute (27 CFR 479.102) states: (iv) In the case of a domestically made firearm, the city and State (or recognized abbreviation thereof) where you as the manufacturer maintain your place of business, or where you, as the maker, made the firearm; For a manufacturer, it's tied to their place of business. For a maker, which is what someone who filed a Form 1 is considered, it's simply the physical location you were standing when the firearm is completed. Yes, for most people, that's your home address...but it doesn't have to be. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/19/2015 7:45:33 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It actually doesn't have anything to do with where you reside, or your trust. The statute (27 CFR 479.102) states: (iv) In the case of a domestically made firearm, the city and State (or recognized abbreviation thereof) where you as the manufacturer maintain your place of business, or where you, as the maker, made the firearm; For a manufacturer, it's tied to their place of business. For a maker, which is what someone who filed a Form 1 is considered, it's simply the physical location you were standing when the firearm is completed. Yes, for most people, that's your home address...but it doesn't have to be. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Question about the city/state. Is that where you currently reside? My trust doesn't have a location. It actually doesn't have anything to do with where you reside, or your trust. The statute (27 CFR 479.102) states: (iv) In the case of a domestically made firearm, the city and State (or recognized abbreviation thereof) where you as the manufacturer maintain your place of business, or where you, as the maker, made the firearm; For a manufacturer, it's tied to their place of business. For a maker, which is what someone who filed a Form 1 is considered, it's simply the physical location you were standing when the firearm is completed. Yes, for most people, that's your home address...but it doesn't have to be. Ahh, I see... so I suppose Mount Doom wouldn't be feasible. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2015 2:42:04 PM EDT
[#9]
Another +1 for CS223. Took a touch longer than expected, but the work is top quality and most importantly to me, he took the time to answer all of my questions.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/28/2015 11:46:57 PM EDT
[#10]
CS223, email sent.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/4/2015 9:39:29 AM EDT
[#11]
Another +1 for CS223. Cheap, fast and great quality. What more could you want? Very happy with how it came out.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/6/2015 10:03:12 PM EDT
[#12]
IM sent
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/15/2015 2:41:24 PM EDT
[#13]
I highly recommend using Charles for your making needs. Excellent quality, fast turn & shipping.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/18/2015 6:05:45 PM EDT
[#14]
Does anyone know for SURE if the caliber is required? I have two receivers, one is marked 5.56 the other is multi. They are engraved by the manufacturer. Is that all that's required? I'm not sure if I want to make a 9mm yet or not.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/18/2015 9:36:29 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Does anyone know for SURE if the caliber is required? I have two receivers, one is marked 5.56 the other is multi. They are engraved by the manufacturer. Is that all that's required? I'm not sure if I want to make a 9mm yet or not. If it's not marked anywhere else, yes. The barrel often meets the requirement. ATF Ruling 2013-3 spells it out fairly clearly. Take special note of Item 5: 5. If the caliber or gauge was not identified or designated (e.g., marked “multi”) on the firearm, the manufacturer, importer, or maker must legibly and conspicuously mark the frame, receiver, barrel, or pistol slide (if applicable) with the actual caliber/gauge once the caliber or gauge is known. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2015 10:06:46 AM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If it's not marked anywhere else, yes. The barrel often meets the requirement. ATF Ruling 2013-3 spells it out fairly clearly. Take special note of Item 5: 5. If the caliber or gauge was not identified or designated (e.g., marked “multi”) on the firearm, the manufacturer, importer, or maker must legibly and conspicuously mark the frame, receiver, barrel, or pistol slide (if applicable) with the actual caliber/gauge once the caliber or gauge is known. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Does anyone know for SURE if the caliber is required? I have two receivers, one is marked 5.56 the other is multi. They are engraved by the manufacturer. Is that all that's required? I'm not sure if I want to make a 9mm yet or not. If it's not marked anywhere else, yes. The barrel often meets the requirement. ATF Ruling 2013-3 spells it out fairly clearly. Take special note of Item 5: 5. If the caliber or gauge was not identified or designated (e.g., marked “multi”) on the firearm, the manufacturer, importer, or maker must legibly and conspicuously mark the frame, receiver, barrel, or pistol slide (if applicable) with the actual caliber/gauge once the caliber or gauge is known. Thank you very much. It reads that "multi" is acceptable. At least from my interpretation. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2015 10:26:05 AM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Thank you very much. It reads that "multi" is acceptable. At least from my interpretation. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Does anyone know for SURE if the caliber is required? I have two receivers, one is marked 5.56 the other is multi. They are engraved by the manufacturer. Is that all that's required? I'm not sure if I want to make a 9mm yet or not. If it's not marked anywhere else, yes. The barrel often meets the requirement. ATF Ruling 2013-3 spells it out fairly clearly. Take special note of Item 5: 5. If the caliber or gauge was not identified or designated (e.g., marked “multi”) on the firearm, the manufacturer, importer, or maker must legibly and conspicuously mark the frame, receiver, barrel, or pistol slide (if applicable) with the actual caliber/gauge once the caliber or gauge is known. Thank you very much. It reads that "multi" is acceptable. At least from my interpretation. Then you need to work on your interpreting skills. (Unless you were saying it was acceptable to use it, but would need to engrave it) There's no problem using a lower marked "multi". However, the firearm must be engraved with the caliber if it's not present on the lower. This can be done on the frame, receiver, barrel, or pistol slide (if applicable). If the barrel is marked, and marked "conspicuously", then you're good. Otherwise, you must engrave. (You also can't put "multi" on the F1) |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2015 11:24:32 AM EDT
[#18]
almost every single ar barrel I've ever seen has been marked with caliber, FWIW
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2015 11:44:17 AM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
almost every single ar barrel I've ever seen has been marked with caliber, FWIW I'll agree that's usually the case. I do have one (9mm) that wasn't visible, and also lost the engravings on my 6.8 when I had a 16" barrel cut down. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/19/2015 3:45:35 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Then you need to work on your interpreting skills. (Unless you were saying it was acceptable to use it, but would need to engrave it) There's no problem using a lower marked "multi". However, the firearm must be engraved with the caliber if it's not present on the lower. This can be done on the frame, receiver, barrel, or pistol slide (if applicable). If the barrel is marked, and marked "conspicuously", then you're good. Otherwise, you must engrave. (You also can't put "multi" on the F1) Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Does anyone know for SURE if the caliber is required? I have two receivers, one is marked 5.56 the other is multi. They are engraved by the manufacturer. Is that all that's required? I'm not sure if I want to make a 9mm yet or not. If it's not marked anywhere else, yes. The barrel often meets the requirement. ATF Ruling 2013-3 spells it out fairly clearly. Take special note of Item 5: 5. If the caliber or gauge was not identified or designated (e.g., marked “multi”) on the firearm, the manufacturer, importer, or maker must legibly and conspicuously mark the frame, receiver, barrel, or pistol slide (if applicable) with the actual caliber/gauge once the caliber or gauge is known. Thank you very much. It reads that "multi" is acceptable. At least from my interpretation. Then you need to work on your interpreting skills. (Unless you were saying it was acceptable to use it, but would need to engrave it) There's no problem using a lower marked "multi". However, the firearm must be engraved with the caliber if it's not present on the lower. This can be done on the frame, receiver, barrel, or pistol slide (if applicable). If the barrel is marked, and marked "conspicuously", then you're good. Otherwise, you must engrave. (You also can't put "multi" on the F1) I'm an idiot, thanks for clarifying. I think I prefer it on the barrel. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/23/2015 9:01:47 AM EDT
[#21]
A huge +1 for Charles. The engraving on my PS90 receiver looks great. Thanks again!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/24/2015 12:02:07 AM EDT
[#22]
Any issues engraving an mpx? How much would I have to strip the lower down for Engraving?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/24/2015 5:51:54 PM EDT
[#23]
What's the best shipping method for getting my lower there?
I am about 35 days into waiting for my efiled form 1, I fugure I better get it engraved ASAP |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/25/2015 2:41:53 AM EDT
[#24]
What's the price for the engraving. Sorry I only looked at the past couple pages.
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
