|
|
Posted: 8/6/2012 8:23:14 AM
[Last Edit: 8/6/2012 8:23:14 AM by Lancelot]
THE IMAGE ABOVE IS A PAID ADVERTISEMENT People keep mentioning this as a deterrent to using this setup, but I am not sure why. As long as it cycles reliably, what's the big deal? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2012 11:55:31 PM
[Last Edit: 8/5/2012 11:56:41 PM by Saddlerocker]
There is less pressure the further down the barrel you go.
So just because you have the same length of barrel after the gas port as say a 10.5" carbine, its not the same. it will be less reliable than a 10.5" By all means try it if you want, but I dont see the reason. Get a Kino if you want a mid length FSB |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2012 11:55:39 PM
i think the question you should be asking why would you want to go with gas length that's unproven at that barrel length? i know some ppl say mid length shoots softer, but not sure if it's worth the risk you would take going with mid length gas when carbine length gas works great.
also, i have read some posts about some of the SBRs being more prone to reliability issues (i have not experience this) so probably best to stick with more time tested formula to minimize any potential issues? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2012 11:55:51 PM
[Last Edit: 8/5/2012 11:56:53 PM by StealthyBlagga]
Insufficient dwell time. The gun may run OK at your home range, but take it into freezing or desert conditions and it could choke. The carbine gas system is generally better for a barrel length under 16". Midlength gas works well at 16-17", then rifle gas starts to make the most sense at 18" and above. JMHO.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/6/2012 12:12:56 AM
Truth be told, I'm never buying a middy again. Everyone blathers on about the decreased pressure, but I've never had any AR break because of the gas system length.
In fact, the only functional issues I've had were using lower power ammo that wouldn't cycle a middy, but fed in a carbine length just fine. Don't drink the internet bandwagon kool aid. It may look and smell good, but the aftertaste is regret. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/6/2012 12:18:41 AM
[Last Edit: 8/6/2012 12:22:52 AM by wildearp]
![]() I run an Armalite middy 16" without any issues.. I am too buzzed to comprehend if this has any relevance to this thread. ![]() Fuckin' Everclear. ![]() |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/6/2012 12:20:42 AM
Originally Posted By olds442tyguy:
Truth be told, I'm never buying a middy again. Everyone blathers on about the decreased pressure, but I've never had any AR break because of the gas system length. Blah Blah Blah. Don't drink the internet bandwagon kool aid. maybe YOU had a problem, this doesnt mean JACK. I have a Mid and it has NEVER had a single issue. this is since 2005. and it gets the most work out of all my rifles. open up the gas port a few thousandths at a time, its not hard to do. lock it up in a V-block and go slow. it will look like a mini Dissipator. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/6/2012 12:31:50 AM
[Last Edit: 8/6/2012 12:32:07 AM by NY_Shooter]
I've heard of cycling problems in 14.5" middys, when using weak ammo. I would assume you'd have to open up the gas port quite a bit with a 12.5" middy, to have it run reliably.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/6/2012 1:53:30 AM
Originally Posted By olds442tyguy:
Truth be told, I'm never buying a middy again. Everyone blathers on about the decreased pressure, but I've never had any AR break because of the gas system length. In fact, the only functional issues I've had were using lower power ammo that wouldn't cycle a middy, but fed in a carbine length just fine. Don't drink the internet bandwagon kool aid. It may look and smell good, but the aftertaste is regret. Have a 16" middy and two 14.5" middies that run any and everything like a champ. Never even seen a slight hickup. I would trust my life with any of those rifles. Sorry I went off topic pertaining to the OP's question, but to trash the mid length gas system in general is ill-informed. 14.5" and 16" middies shoot like a dream, and are every bit as reliable as carbines. And while there's a bit less of a difference with 14.5" barrels, the difference is even more noticeable with 16" barrels. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/6/2012 2:56:32 AM
Originally Posted By AR-Ryan21:
Originally Posted By olds442tyguy:
Truth be told, I'm never buying a middy again. Everyone blathers on about the decreased pressure, but I've never had any AR break because of the gas system length. In fact, the only functional issues I've had were using lower power ammo that wouldn't cycle a middy, but fed in a carbine length just fine. Don't drink the internet bandwagon kool aid. It may look and smell good, but the aftertaste is regret. Have a 16" middy and two 14.5" middies that run any and everything like a champ. Never even seen a slight hickup. I would trust my life with any of those rifles. Sorry I went off topic pertaining to the OP's question, but to trash the mid length gas system in general is ill-informed. 14.5" and 16" middies shoot like a dream, and are every bit as reliable as carbines. And while there's a bit less of a difference with 14.5" barrels, the difference is even more noticeable with 16" barrels. My point was if a 14.5" or 16" middy occasionally has issues, why bother risking a 12.5". A midlength gas system on that length of barrel will pose no benefit. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/6/2012 3:22:23 AM
Originally Posted By olds442tyguy:
Originally Posted By AR-Ryan21:
Originally Posted By olds442tyguy:
Truth be told, I'm never buying a middy again. Everyone blathers on about the decreased pressure, but I've never had any AR break because of the gas system length. In fact, the only functional issues I've had were using lower power ammo that wouldn't cycle a middy, but fed in a carbine length just fine. Don't drink the internet bandwagon kool aid. It may look and smell good, but the aftertaste is regret. Have a 16" middy and two 14.5" middies that run any and everything like a champ. Never even seen a slight hickup. I would trust my life with any of those rifles. Sorry I went off topic pertaining to the OP's question, but to trash the mid length gas system in general is ill-informed. 14.5" and 16" middies shoot like a dream, and are every bit as reliable as carbines. And while there's a bit less of a difference with 14.5" barrels, the difference is even more noticeable with 16" barrels. My point was if a 14.5" or 16" middy occasionally has issues, why bother risking a 12.5". A midlength gas system on that length of barrel will pose no benefit. Agreed as far as the 12.5" is concerned. My comment was solely directed towards you sounding to throw middies in general under the bus. I was simply giving my experiences that with 14.5" and 16" configurations, a middy is every bit as good, and even better than a carbine. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/7/2012 10:16:35 AM
If I wanted the shortness of a 12.5" build and the additional handguard leagth of the midlength then I would look at a BCM Kino upper. Reliabilty of a 12.5" carbine with the extra length of the middy.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/7/2012 10:50:43 AM
Originally Posted By olds442tyguy: Originally Posted By AR-Ryan21: Originally Posted By olds442tyguy: Truth be told, I'm never buying a middy again. Everyone blathers on about the decreased pressure, but I've never had any AR break because of the gas system length. In fact, the only functional issues I've had were using lower power ammo that wouldn't cycle a middy, but fed in a carbine length just fine. Don't drink the internet bandwagon kool aid. It may look and smell good, but the aftertaste is regret. Have a 16" middy and two 14.5" middies that run any and everything like a champ. Never even seen a slight hickup. I would trust my life with any of those rifles. Sorry I went off topic pertaining to the OP's question, but to trash the mid length gas system in general is ill-informed. 14.5" and 16" middies shoot like a dream, and are every bit as reliable as carbines. And while there's a bit less of a difference with 14.5" barrels, the difference is even more noticeable with 16" barrels. My point was if a 14.5" or 16" middy occasionally has issues, why bother risking a 12.5". A midlength gas system on that length of barrel will pose no benefit. What your missing is that reliability has far more to do with gas port size than location. I have quite a few different gas systems and most the time I haven't had to touch the gas port. 16" barrel rifle gas rifle buffer - Runs 5.56 and brass (standard pressure) .223 without issue but doesn't like TULA - I haven't opened the gas port on this one yet. 20" barrel rifle gas rifle buffer - Runs 5.56 and .223 including TULA - but doesn't lock back after last round with TULA - This is a FN barrel and BCG 18" barrel rifle gas rifle buffer - Runs 5.56 I have never experience a failure but it has failed to lock back on some .223 - I haven't had this out in a awhile and the failure to lock open could be magazine related - I need to take it back out and play with it again 16" barrel carbine gas standard buffer - I haven't run any TULA in this one yet - the gas port is pretty small .065 IIRC 15.4" barrel carbine gas Spikes T2 buffer - Runs everything including TULA and locks back at the end of the mag. 14.5" barrel Mid length gas H3 buffer - Runs everything and locks the magazine back on everything. This barrel came with a gas port on the larger size of spec. Originally had some issues with a standard buffer while running full auto, but the H3 fixed it. 10" barrel carbine gas H1 buffer - Runs 5.56 and .223 including TULA without failure - always locks open at the end of the magazine and works suppressed and unsuppressed. 12.5" barrel Mid length gas - This is a 6.8 that I am putting together pretty soon. All the parts are waiting for me when I get back - this is a factory AR Performance barrel and I don't expect issues People hark on dwell time, but IME gas port size is far more important than dwell time or buffer. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/8/2012 1:30:34 PM
A must read if you do not yet understand HOW and WHY the direct impingement system works:
http://www.ar15barrels.com/prod/operation.shtml |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/8/2012 1:36:32 PM
Originally Posted By LonghunterCO:
If I wanted the shortness of a 12.5" build and the additional handguard leagth of the midlength then I would look at a BCM Kino upper. Reliabilty of a 12.5" carbine with the extra length of the middy. Or this rail on a 12.5"
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/8/2012 3:08:24 PM
Originally Posted By pistolpete:
Originally Posted By LonghunterCO:
If I wanted the shortness of a 12.5" build and the additional handguard leagth of the midlength then I would look at a BCM Kino upper. Reliabilty of a 12.5" carbine with the extra length of the middy. Or this rail on a 12.5" http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q46/pistolpete17/Supp12.jpg That's a nice stick |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/9/2012 1:22:26 PM
12.5 Middy AR That Works
I just wanted to post this (goofy) review of the Warsport 12.5'' middy. I haven't gotten to put rounds through this one yet but everyone I know that has seems to like it. Just throwing it out there..... |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2012 10:25:20 AM
[Last Edit: 8/11/2012 10:27:12 AM by wtwining]
Originally Posted By LonghunterCO:
If I wanted the shortness of a 12.5" build and the additional handguard leagth of the midlength then I would look at a BCM Kino upper. Reliabilty of a 12.5" carbine with the extra length of the middy. +1
Not mine (I wish!) but someday I hope to have an A1 like it. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2012 10:41:02 AM
![]() |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/12/2012 8:16:49 PM
Originally Posted By wtwining: Originally Posted By LonghunterCO: If I wanted the shortness of a 12.5" build and the additional handguard leagth of the midlength then I would look at a BCM Kino upper. Reliabilty of a 12.5" carbine with the extra length of the middy. +1 http://i302.photobucket.com/albums/nn115/wjtwining/RockinDissy.jpg Not mine (I wish!) but someday I hope to have an A1 like it. I have always liked that gun. |
|
|