|
|
Posted: 7/30/2012 11:42:58 AM
THE IMAGE ABOVE IS A PAID ADVERTISEMENT Any input? Thanks! |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/30/2012 12:40:20 PM
[Last Edit: 7/30/2012 12:42:00 PM by TkFF]
Unfortunately, the only way to pay one transfer fee per NFA item is with an instate transfer. From one state to another state from an individual, there will always be 2 $200 transfer fees.
ETA: The seller will have to transfer it to his dealer on a Form 4. SOT to out of state SOT is free. Your SOT to you is another Form 4. Each form 4 is $200. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/30/2012 1:08:58 PM
+1 to the above. In addition to that, I am sure you are aware of NC's goofy MG laws, right?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/30/2012 2:00:40 PM
Originally Posted By NAM:
+1 to the above. In addition to that, I am sure you are aware of NC's goofy MG laws, right? I am. I think I can get the permit. If not, I'll just pass on the deal. So, if I understand this correctly, if I wanted to transfer a MG (or any other NFA item) to a dealer in my town, I would (or someone would) have to pay the $200 tax even though the transfer is to a SOT? |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/30/2012 2:09:45 PM
Originally Posted By Landric:
So, if I understand this correctly, if I wanted to transfer a MG (or any other NFA item) to a dealer in my town, I would (or someone would) have to pay the $200 tax even though the transfer is to a SOT? Dealers can transfer between each other via tax free form 3. Any transfer to/from an individual is on a form 4, and taxable. From what I recall, you can have the seller transfer the MG directly to YOUR dealer on a Form 4. Then, your dealer transfers to you on a form 4. 2 transfers take place, 2 taxes paid for said transfers (assuming a single NFA Item). In your case, I do not beleive a tax free transfer would be beneficial, as it would be Form 4 from seller to his dealer, form 3 from his dealer to your dealer, then form 4 from your dealer to you. 3 transfers, but one of those is tax free. The result is the same amount of tax, but longer wait time, and possibly more FFL charges for transfering. Mind you, it's been a few years since i've received an MG, so thing may have changed somewhat. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/30/2012 4:33:33 PM
IM Sent
MAHA |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/30/2012 5:22:02 PM
[Last Edit: 7/31/2012 8:40:45 AM by thormx538]
Non-SOT to Non-SOT = Form 4, $200 (only if within the same state)
For state to state transfers: Non-SOT to SOT = Form 4, $200 SOT to SOT = Form 3, no tax SOT to Non-SOT = Form 4, $200 Any time it crosses state lines, it must be SOT to SOT FFL. Whoops, thanks Circuits |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/30/2012 9:22:06 PM
Originally Posted By thormx538:
Any time it crosses state lines, it must be SOT to SOT. No. Crossing state lines it must go to an FFL, but not necessarily to a SOT. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/30/2012 11:15:05 PM
Originally Posted By Circuits:
Originally Posted By thormx538:
Any time it crosses state lines, it must be SOT to SOT. No. Crossing state lines it must go to an FFL, but not necessarily to a SOT. My friend is a FFL, but not a SOT. Does that mean that somehow his dad can transfer the gun on a form 4 to his son, the FFL, who can then transfer it to me? Or does a FFL in SC still have to be involved? |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/30/2012 11:26:05 PM
Originally Posted By Landric: Originally Posted By Circuits: Originally Posted By thormx538: Any time it crosses state lines, it must be SOT to SOT. No. Crossing state lines it must go to an FFL, but not necessarily to a SOT. My friend is a FFL, but not a SOT. Does that mean that somehow his dad can transfer the gun on a form 4 to his son, the FFL, who can then transfer it to me? Or does a FFL in SC still have to be involved? It needs to go to an FFL in your state. $200 whether they have a SOT or not. Then from that FFL to you, another $200. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/31/2012 8:42:19 AM
Originally Posted By Circuits:
Originally Posted By thormx538:
Any time it crosses state lines, it must be SOT to SOT. No. Crossing state lines it must go to an FFL, but not necessarily to a SOT. Didn't know that –– thanks. But it must come from an SOT? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/31/2012 12:22:35 PM
Originally Posted By thormx538:
Originally Posted By Circuits:
Originally Posted By thormx538:
Any time it crosses state lines, it must be SOT to SOT. No. Crossing state lines it must go to an FFL, but not necessarily to a SOT. Didn't know that –– thanks. But it must come from an SOT? Nope. A regular non-SOT FFL can directly receive any firearm even NFA even from an out of state private seller/shipper. The SOT only means no taxes for shipments between SOT. It also lets the SOT purchase dealer samples, which no non-SOT can get at all, and allows the SOT to transport interstate without having to file 5320.20s. And it's required if a dealer regularly does business in NFA. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/31/2012 12:34:49 PM
Originally Posted By Circuits:
Nope. A regular non-SOT FFL can directly receive any firearm even NFA even from an out of state private seller/shipper. The SOT only means no taxes for shipments between SOT. It also lets the SOT purchase dealer samples, which no non-SOT can get at all, and allows the SOT to transport interstate without having to file 5320.20s. And it's required if a dealer regularly does business in NFA. Oh wow, I didn't know that. I always assumed the path for stuff to travel state lines between individuals was Form 4, seller to SOT in their state. Then when that cleared, form 3 SOT to SOT in buyer's state. Then form 4 from that SOT to the buyer. So does the seller just use a form 4 to transfer it to any FFL in the buyer's state, then the FFL uses a form 4 to transfer it to the buyer? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/31/2012 4:59:27 PM
Originally Posted By thormx538:
So does the seller just use a form 4 to transfer it to any FFL in the buyer's state, then the FFL uses a form 4 to transfer it to the buyer? That's basically it, yeah. A SOT in the buyer's state will be more comfortable and probably knowledgeable handling the transfer, but any non-SOT FFL who's willing to do so, could handle it, as well. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/6/2012 11:39:59 AM
Originally Posted By Circuits: Originally Posted By thormx538: So does the seller just use a form 4 to transfer it to any FFL in the buyer's state, then the FFL uses a form 4 to transfer it to the buyer? That's basically it, yeah. A SOT in the buyer's state will be more comfortable and probably knowledgeable handling the transfer, but any non-SOT FFL who's willing to do so, could handle it, as well. Humm, what about a C&R 03 FFL?? Can I as a 03 get a gun transfered in to me then can I transfer it to my trust???? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/6/2012 11:47:12 AM
Originally Posted By Chas8008:
Originally Posted By Circuits:
Originally Posted By thormx538:
So does the seller just use a form 4 to transfer it to any FFL in the buyer's state, then the FFL uses a form 4 to transfer it to the buyer? That's basically it, yeah. A SOT in the buyer's state will be more comfortable and probably knowledgeable handling the transfer, but any non-SOT FFL who's willing to do so, could handle it, as well. Humm, what about a C&R 03 FFL?? Can I as a 03 get a gun transfered in to me then can I transfer it to my trust???? is it a C&R weapon? I would have the C&R license in the same name as the trust, and have the trust manage it. that way, it would transfer directly in to the trust. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/6/2012 1:01:42 PM
Originally Posted By Chas8008:
Originally Posted By Circuits:
Originally Posted By thormx538:
So does the seller just use a form 4 to transfer it to any FFL in the buyer's state, then the FFL uses a form 4 to transfer it to the buyer? That's basically it, yeah. A SOT in the buyer's state will be more comfortable and probably knowledgeable handling the transfer, but any non-SOT FFL who's willing to do so, could handle it, as well. Humm, what about a C&R 03 FFL?? Can I as a 03 get a gun transfered in to me then can I transfer it to my trust???? You can, but it would be $200 to transfer it from out of state to you, as the C&R FFL holder, and another $200 to transfer it to your trust after that. There might also be some issues with making a transfer to your trust right after you get it, since a C&R license is supposed to be for collecting, not facilitating NFA transfers, but that is just my feeling, I have no experience in the matter. At any rate, I couldn't do a MAC on my C&R since it isn't (yet). I ended up finding a MAC in NC for sale and made a deal on that rather than paying an extra $400 and waiting an extra 6 months for the one in SC. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/6/2012 1:18:39 PM
Can the state-state transfer be eliminated if the seller physically takes it to the buyer's FFL?
If I transfer a Title 1 weapon to a resident of another state I can meet the buyer at his FFL in his home state and do the transfer there; does the same apply for Title 2 items (assuming the forms have cleared ATF)? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/6/2012 2:07:02 PM
Originally Posted By FredMan:
Can the state-state transfer be eliminated if the seller physically takes it to the buyer's FFL? If I transfer a Title 1 weapon to a resident of another state I can meet the buyer at his FFL in his home state and do the transfer there; does the same apply for Title 2 items (assuming the forms have cleared ATF)? No. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/6/2012 4:27:45 PM
Originally Posted By FredMan:
Can the state-state transfer be eliminated if the seller physically takes it to the buyer's FFL? If I transfer a Title 1 weapon to a resident of another state I can meet the buyer at his FFL in his home state and do the transfer there; does the same apply for Title 2 items (assuming the forms have cleared ATF)? ATF will not approve that Form 4, so no. |
|