Quote History View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History Quoted:
Quoted: This for me as well. I like 9mm carbines and I like M1 carbines, but the reviews put out by early buyers of this gun were pretty disappointing.
Never understood why it seems difficult for mfr's to make
reliable, quality 9mm (.40, .45acp, etc) semiauto carbines. You take a .22LR gun and size it up somewhat to match whatever magazine you're using. You then can sell it for three or four times the price of the .22LR gun that was the basis for the whole thing; yet it still seems more often done poorly than done well...
http://hi-pointfirearms.com/Hi-Point-carbines/45Caliber_carbine.html
I looked at those briefly, but based on typical (round-count) lifespan reports and my own experience with their predecessor, I passed. I have one of the previous-branded handguns (Haskell or Stallard, don't recall which) in .45acp that I bought for $75 twenty years ago or so, and it's basically an oversized Jennings .25acp in design, and below the Jennings in build quality.
Weird thing about the HiPoints is that I think they can actually be a decent gun for someone who doesn't shoot a lot recreationally, but wants a defensive carbine in their pistol's caliber. They seem to be reliable, they just have a short life expectancy in terms of rounds fired.
From their own site:
http://www.hipointfirearmsforums.com/Lifespan-of-a-Hi-Point.html
...typical failures of carbines around the 4,000 round mark and the occasional extreme wear seen as early as the 400-round mark when using rather stiff ammo. Since 2011, Hi-Point has included longer rail inserts in the striker channel of its carbines to strengthen these little wonders up to live past the 4-6,000 round mark. This firing pin channel has been documented to break at around that point previously.
It may be considered blasphemy by a lot of guys, but I believe it's true that a hipoint that's been fired enough to confirm reliability could be a serviceable defensive gun. Not my favorite, but it could be made to work. I just like to shoot mine a bunch, and that low round-count life-expectancy (4-6000 rounds..?) takes it out of consideration for me personally. If it shared magazines with something I already owned, I still might actually consider one, but having to buy proprietary mags for a gun with that short of a life expectancy is another strike against it imo.
Again, not meaning to sound snobbish about it at all. I think they could served a lot of folks well; if it's someone who doesn't shoot a ton. But while I don't mind replacing springs, buffers, etc, every 4000-6000 rounds, but replacing the
gun at those intervals is just too often for me personally.