Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Posted: 5/22/2016 11:37:13 PM EDT
My dad has a old (1935) Marlin in .38-56. Collectible or shooter?
Link Posted: 5/22/2016 11:39:51 PM EDT
[#1]
Never heard of it, so...
"collectible".
Link Posted: 5/23/2016 12:05:15 AM EDT
[#2]
I think you mean 38-55.  I don't know if they are worth that much.  Supposed to be a good round.
Link Posted: 5/23/2016 1:00:10 AM EDT
[#3]
Nope, it's a Marlin 1895 in.38-56 Winchester caliber. Heavy bastard with an octagon barrel. My dad made ammo out of reformed .45-70 brass but hasn't fired it in about 20 years.
Link Posted: 5/23/2016 9:00:33 AM EDT
[#4]
I stand corrected, never heard of one before.

The .38-56 Winchester Center Fire cartridge was introduced in 1887 by Winchester for the Winchester Model 1886,[3] and was also used in the Marlin Model of 1895. Production of Model 1886s chambered in this cartridge ceased in 1910 due to lack of demand,[3] while most commercial production of the cartridge itself ceased in the 1930s. New production loaded cartridges and unloaded brass cases are rare, and are often created using reformed .45-70 brass. The cartridge was originally intended to outperform the similar .38-55 Winchester, but in reality had very similar ballistics despite using more gunpowder
Link Posted: 5/23/2016 1:25:35 PM EDT
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I stand corrected, never heard of one before.

The .38-56 Winchester Center Fire cartridge was introduced in 1887 by Winchester for the Winchester Model 1886,[3] and was also used in the Marlin Model of 1895. Production of Model 1886s chambered in this cartridge ceased in 1910 due to lack of demand,[3] while most commercial production of the cartridge itself ceased in the 1930s. New production loaded cartridges and unloaded brass cases are rare, and are often created using reformed .45-70 brass. The cartridge was originally intended to outperform the similar .38-55 Winchester, but in reality had very similar ballistics despite using more gunpowder
View Quote

Dont feel bad, I had to google it as well.
Link Posted: 5/23/2016 9:21:53 PM EDT
[#6]
I'd shoot it.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top