I do.

Let me put some of my thoughts together on this, and I'll try to post a bit more later this evening.

ETA:  You can start on  this page of the big camera thread, and read the next page as well.  It will start to give you an appreciation for what it takes to get plates... and that's only during the day.  Night-time is the real test... and that's where a purpose-built LPR camera earns its money.

A diagram of this intersection would be helpful... with distances, and proposed camera locations, if you please.

Just so you understand, License Plate Recognition (or LPR) cameras are usually a purpose-built item, that rarely shows you much else about the vehicle.  They are strictly focused on the area where the plate could be expected to pass through the field-of-view.  You will usually require a SECOND camera to give you an overall scene picture (in color) of the vehicle as it passes through your entrance.  

LPR cameras usually have a fast shutter speed (maybe 1/500 of a second, or even faster), and are paired with an infrared source.  They also have a special filter (called an LPF, or Long-Pass-Filter) over the lens to block out visible light, but allow IR light to reach the imager.  This is important/necessary because license plates tend to be surrounded by bright visible lights (headlights and tail lights), which you must block out in order to avoid washing out the image.   The IR source's sole purpose is to illuminate the plate, and said sources are usually fairly powerful.  

The IR source needs to be strong in order to provide good light return from the plate.  A powerful IR light will allow the plate to be readable at a fast shutter speed, because fast shutter-speeds reduce the effectiveness of the light.  If the shutter speed is fast, that means the exposure-time is short, and thus there isn't much time for the imager to gather the light it needs to produce a usable image.   In short, fast-shutter-speeds require more light, and fast shutter-speeds are necessary to catch sharp images of moving objects.  

IR-illuminator manufacturers are consistently "generous" with the range of their illuminators.  You never quite get the expected range, and it's even worse when you start considering LPR applications.  We often tell people to cut the advertised "range" of an IR illuminator in half (eg. if it's advertised as a 50-foot range, it's really about 25 feet), but for LPR purposed, you need to cut it by 2/3.  So that "75 Meter" IR source is good for maybe 25 meters for plates.  

Then you need enough pixel-density in your camera's resolution to get a readable image.  

I really don't recommend LPR cameras for beginners.  I'd been doing cameras for years (and experimenting with them for a similar time-frame) before I did my first LPR setup, and I had to do a LOT of reading/trial-and-error before I got it dialed it.  

You are probably better off hiring somebody.

Your image link is broken.

ETA:  nvm... I see it now

Are you in a 1-plate or 2-plate state?  (eg. do you have front plates as well as back plates?)

What's the width of that street?

Might check out this link.  The Mobotix line offers imager/lens combos that could allow you to cover both streets with a single camera brain (with two imagers... look up the S15/16 line of cameras)

Link

The tool shows imager options, scene width, and pixel densities (you want about 80 pixels per foot... or as that tool shows, 40 pixels per-face-width).  On that link, You want the "identify" column,  or better.

Here is a video from a dual-imager Mobotix camera (probably an M12 or M15).  The left half of the image you see in the video is a regular black-and-white "Night" imager.  The right half is from a LPF (Long Pass Filter) imager.  




The camera itself looks like this:



The lens/imager modules can be switched out to whatever zoom/day/night/LPF combo you want.  In the video above, the left-sided "Night" imager is wider-angle, and provides the "area" overview of the scene.  You'll notice the right-sided "LPF" imager is a tighter shot.  It provides more magnification to ID the plate, at the price of a narrower field-of-view.  The imagers cannot be aimed independently, so the right-sided imager provides a magnified, visible-light filtered view of roughly the center section of the left-handed image.  

If you study the video above, it will give you a rough idea of what a LPR camera will look like:  everything dark, EXCEPT the plate.  

What I don't see in that video is any evidence of an IR source.  That's a mistake... some IR light would make those plates really pop.

BTW, I'm only throwing Mobotix out there because that's the only brand of cameras I've used to implement an LPR system.   I don't work for Mobotix, or sell cameras... I don't even do Security Cameras for a living... but I do know that they work.  

I used an S15, with a B&W imager for area coverage, and an LPF L160 night imager for the plate-shots.  I paired the LPR imager with a Samsung SPI-30 IR illuminator, with a 70-meter range (the viewing area through which vehicles were passing was about 20-25 yards away).  

I got the whole thing done for <$2k, which isn't cheap, but isn't $6k.  

This is the type of camera I used.  The cables to the imagers are a special type of USB cable (a regular USB cable will NOT work), and can be up to six feet in length each.  In essence, you can put the "brain" of the camera in a box, and your two imagers up to six-feet-away.  Make sure you use at least 1/2" conduit... the special USB cables won't fit through anything smaller.