Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Posted: 10/17/2016 7:54:58 PM EDT


Hi ya all,





My new Lee molds finally arrived and I did some experiments.





I shot today my new lead Lee .358" diameter 148 grain Wad Cutter Elmer Keith style lube grooves bullet seated 0.098" deep from flush and with 3.0 grains 700X type scavenged shotshell powder. I am from Southamerica and we can not get here gun powder.





With These I get less Penetration with the same powder Charge and seating depth (seated to 0.098" deeper from flush) as with the same depth seated (and same powder Charge) Lee .356" Diameter 124 grain Truncated Cone Tumble Lube lead bullets.





Data comparison Synthesis:





The 148 grain WC have less Penetration than the 124 grain Truncated Cone bullets





The Wad Cutter Elmer Keith style lube grooves bullet have LESS Penetration than the Truncated Cone Tumble Lube lead bullets.





What causes the lesser Penetration?





Is it the weight difference or is it the lube groove design difference? Or is it the greater bearing Surface of the Wadcutter design vs the Truncated Cone design?





 
Link Posted: 10/17/2016 7:55:31 PM EDT
[#1]


...continuation from previous post





The 148 grain WC penetrated an Wood 1.3" and got stuck on the Wood behind. The 124 grain TC penetrated totalling 2.1" of Wood and continued it's path with audible force (both shot from about 10 meters distance). The Wadcutter made a way bigger entrance and Exit hole but my worry is it's lack of Penetration. Shot from 30 meters to an Eucalyptus tree the Wadcutter hit were I aimed and mushroomed to about .67 inches (originally they supposed to be .358 inches in Diameter).





 
Link Posted: 10/17/2016 8:12:52 PM EDT
[#2]
To put it as simple as possible, the 148 wadcutter is a target bullet, designed to punch neat clean holes in paper/cardboard.  It will put a hurt on someone but is not designed to hunting or self defense.  Since it is a soft target bullet being pushed at moderately slow speed you can't expect to get serious penetration.

Now for a defensive/hunting application a 158 grain semi-wadcutter or round nose will perform much better. I don't know what bullet molds are available to you in SA.
Link Posted: 10/17/2016 8:43:16 PM EDT
[#3]

Dear MKT,


As I can recall an Youtube Video of Dr Fackler (studies wound channel, gun shot effects, lethality from guns in Hospitals and is Trauma surgeon, works for the Military as I remember) he allways recommends the bullet must be:


as heavy as possible; as bigger as possible; and if possible shoot it from a rifle or shotgun. He recommends WADCUTTERS specially because of their cutting edge characteristics, heavyness, they create lots of trauma and supposedly "they Keep on going through everything". Wadcutters are best for self defense as I can recall him. Round nose, SWC, light and small diameter bullets he does not like. And they have to be an 45 caliber bullet (45 acp are recommended according to Dr. Fackler).


That is why I am surprised my Wadcutters did not have that much Penetration as "they supposed to have" since they "Keep going through all kinds of stuff".


Link Posted: 10/17/2016 9:01:28 PM EDT
[#4]

Here the Video Dr. grabinsky (Fackler?). What he says about Wadcutters and 45 caliber recomended bullets.




Graphik Content. Be advised!


Link Posted: 10/17/2016 9:59:54 PM EDT
[#5]
The difference you're seeing in penetration is a function of the velocities involved. That heavier wadcutter is probably traveling around 650 FPS (Feet Per Second), and has a much larger frontal area than the 124 gr, but the 9mm is going around 900 FPS due to the smaller case capacity, and has less frontal area since it's a truncated cone design. The listed velocities assume you are actually shooting 700X. BTW, the 9mm load is below the starting charge for 9mm. Either caliber could probably handle another 1 grain of powder, but you need to work up to this level, don't try it all at once.
Link Posted: 10/17/2016 10:34:30 PM EDT
[#6]
It seems kinda obvious to me. One is slower and less pointed while the other is faster and pointed.

You describe it in your description of the vidio. The waddcuter with its large frontal area pushes a lot of material.

Did the vidio also describe how a truncated cone punches though without opening a large wound channel.

If you read your own post you answered your question.

Motor

ETA: Oh and there is a huge difference between wood and flesh.
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 10:03:06 AM EDT
[#7]
I would not be surprised if I would stick to Wadcutters only in 38 spl/357 mag revolvers.





Today one medium big calf was dieying. After being dead I thought I would try one of the 3.0 grain loaded Wadcutters on it to verify penetration on meet. From about 6 meters I shot it into the belly (rib area). The Wadcutter hit an rib on the entrance wound and exited without any problem at the other side of the rib area. I saw it continueing its path with force but could not retrieve the proyectile. Blood was pouring in a stream from the exit wound (before I lifted up the animal it had laying dead on that side for a couple of minutes). The exit hole was bigger than the full diameter nicely round cut entrance wound. As I saw the fluid streaming out of the exit hole I realised the importance of blood loss in order best is big entrance and exit hole for primary cavity (better is there is an exit hole as well so from 2 holes poures the liquid out).

Link Posted: 10/19/2016 10:03:36 AM EDT
[#8]
I believe this proyectile did not deform at all. The proyectiles I shot before at wood all deformed and today I realised the Wadcutters had tumbled and because of hitting with its longside the second wood they did not penetrate it.


I guess I will order the Lee 148 grain Tumble Lube Wadcutter as well and load the Wadcutters with more powder.
 
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 10:04:43 AM EDT
[#9]
One thing comes to my mind.



Why is the Wadcutter such an underperforming bullet for defense if the 45 ACP travels as slow as well?

They should be kind of similar performance just in different calibers.



Any ideas about

45 ACP versus 357 mag Wadcutter (148 grain Lee full WC)
Link Posted: 10/19/2016 7:25:50 PM EDT
[#10]
Hi again,
I made a few empirical test again although I bet on you
guys are waiting for the chrono data in order to be sure.


But empirical
Trial-error is my only possibility to date so I include again some photos of
Penetration. These both are shot from an distance of 45 meters.
First photo is te ENTRACE on the first Wood and
the second Wood I Show as well to see the Penetration. The big hole is the lead
Lee 148 Wadcutter with 3.4 grain of powder. It clearly tumbled upon Impact and
almost turned 70 degrees as it hit the second Wood which it did not penetrate.
The bullet has an Diameter of .651" (Surface which hit the 2nd wood bout 70
degrees sideways).


The other entrance to see is from an PMC factory 9mm Luger
bullet. The entrance hole is way smaller but it penetrated 3 Woods and continued
it's path furtheron.





Second photo is the EXIT holes of the first
Wood and you can observe the Wadcutter made an way bigger Exit hole as the 9mm
Luger. The WC just ripped through as Long as it had momentum.








See
both photos








The
lack of Penetration of the Wadcutter may be due to it being soft lead. As
I stated before in soft tissue, as the dead 120 lbs calf, the Wadcutter may not
deform and did an good Job as it exited the animal and continued it's path. I do
not think the WC tumbled in the dead animal but went straight through.


Maybe
as well the lack of Penetration of the Wadcutter is due to it Encounters an
hard Surface (in hard medium it may lack Penetration but in soft tissue
medium it may perform very well.





Sellier&Bellot state for their 9mm
Luger FMJ an Ballistic Coefficient of 1.56 meanwhile the Lee 148 grain Wadcutter
has an BC of 0.72. So the calculation would be as follows: 1.56/0.72= 2.166. So
the 9mm Luger FMJ factory round will have an 2.166 times more Penetration. That
means if the WC penetrates 1 Wood the 9mm Luger should penetrate just over 2
Woods. But it did 3 Woods. The additional Wood penetrated by the FMJ may due to
harder bullet and maybe the factory round had more powder in it.


Once again
the BC confirms empirical data and vice versa.

 
Link Posted: 10/20/2016 7:12:46 PM EDT
[#11]
My experience and Pictures demonstrate as well that the WC does not tumble (at
least within 45 meters). But I am a Little confused.



a) Some sources say
Wadcutters are MORE prone to tumble due to their cilyndrical shape.

b)
Other sources say a bullet has to be NOSE HEAVY in order to NOT to tumble
(Kind of 7/8 oz Lee drive key slug. The 1 oz Lee drive key slug supposed to
tumble because it has ist weight evenly distributed like an cilyndrical shape
WC). The 7/8 oz Lee slug falls allways on it's nose (I have that mold).

c)
Again others say an Semi Wadcutter does NOT tumble because ist nose has
LESS WEIGHT and the main weight is more in the centre of the bullet (those Claim
the WC is an tumbler after 50 Yards. For them the WC is the worst tumbler
ever!). These People Claim, that is the reason the hollow Point is very accurate
since it's nose is light and the weight is more in the centre of the
bullet.



So I am a Little confused.

But yes my WC at least never
tumbled at Impact of any distances. Only within the media it started to jaw. I
Attribute that to it being an lead bullet. Lead will go the least
resistance since it deforms easy.

I saw in other Forums an older form of
early SWC called Himmelwright design.

http://www.lasc.us/429220-9.jpg



My
thoughts:


As I saw that (Himmelwright) design I liked it. Seems to be an
fairly hefty Wadcutter with an longer round nose. The round nose is not to small
nor to big. The Long small nose I guess will act as an nail for Penetration; or
it breaks off after Penetration for a second wound channel. The rest of the
Himmlwright Body Looks like an full Wadcutter (big hole). What seems practical
to me is the small Diameter but long round nose in front of the Wadcutter.
Wished Lee would make that design.

Anyone experience
with These Himmelwright and comparison to Wadcutters?

Link Posted: 10/22/2016 11:34:03 AM EDT
[#12]
Today I made a few more shots at Wood to compare Penetration. These are the
results (Shooting is from 45 meters distance):

I shot Lee 124 grain TC
TL and 148 grain Wadcutters seated like Nagant style in 38 spl cases. And
FMJ reloads in 9mm Luger and 124 grain TC TL lead bullets loaded (OAL 1.044") in
9mm Luger.



1. The lead bullets all penetrated just one sheet.
Therefore the Lee 148 grain Wadcutter (Nagant style seated WC from before
Shootings) had the same Penetration than the the deep seated (again Nagant
style) 38 spl with the Lee 124 grain TC TL lead bullet. As well the Lee 124
grain TC TL lead bullet loaded in 9mm Luger case had only similar Penetration
than the Nagant style 38 spl deep seated WC and TC.



2. Winchester 9mm
Luger FMJ 115 grain hollow base did have ALLWAYS more Penetration than all lead
bullets. It penetrated in average 2 Sheets of Wood. The factory ammo penetrated
3+ Sheets of Wood which is due to more powder I guess.

Powder Charge was
the same (or similar) for 124 grain TC in 9mm Luger, Nagant style seated 124
grain TC and 148 grain WC in 38 spl cases
.



3. The lead 124 grain TC
TL bullets loaded in 9mm Luger had about a month of curing time. Those had a tad
more Penetration than the newly cast WC. The indents were a Little deeper. It
probably is due to the harder lead bullet.



4. Regardless the shape of the
lead bullet those had all similar Penetration. The FMJ had allways more
Penetration than any lead bullet.



5. The recovered lead bullets expanded
about: the 148 grain Wadcutter expanded from .61" to .65" and the 124
grain Truncated Cone from .57" to .69".



Maybe we could try some
conclusions (Penetration in hard media):


The Penetration depends on FMJ
or lead as bullet material. The Penetration does NOT depend that much of lead
bullet shape in hard media. Lead bullets expanded about equally regardless it's
original weight. The WC made allways a bigger entrance and Exit hole (Overall
more destruction) than the lead TC or FMJ.



If someone
is interested in this please let me know your opinions or any personal
experiances or similar tests made.

Link Posted: 10/22/2016 12:46:33 PM EDT
[#13]



I realised my deeply seated 124 grain TC and the most recent Lee 148 grain
Wadcutters are seated similar to the Nagant Military Surplus ammo. Just loaded in 38 spl cases and crimp is just undoing the mouth bell.
Like
here photo above.

















 
Link Posted: 10/22/2016 2:46:00 PM EDT
[#14]

       Here the Nagant style Lee 148 grain Wadcutter in an 38 spl case loaded to "357
mag" pressures with 3.4 grain powder:








  I just shot an cat with it again. Got him right trough the head. No tumbling to
see (big Exit hole). Once dead I shot him again through the ribs. Nice entrance and Exit hole.
No tumbling to see. The bullet (next left to the Wadcutter reload in the photo)
is the bullet of the second shot which got flattened out at my Wood stop behind
the dead cat.

Seems to an lead bullet (no matter what design or meplat) does
very well in soft media. But in hard media it soon looses Penetration due to
Deformation and Expansion.

The other deformed lead bullets are all from
shooting at Wood from an distance of 45 meters.

Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top