Page:  / 4
Author
Message
Jailer
Offline
Posts: 565
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 6/22/2011 4:18:20 PM
What an appropriately timed thread. I just received my Wolff reduced power springs for my 21 in the mail yesterday.

I'm running a lightish charge of 231 under a 198gr H&G 130. Was having a couple of FTF so I'm going to try a couple different springs to see what I like and what works best.

I love the light striker spring.

1911smith are you doing anything to address powder position mentioned in the article you posted other than deep seating and a tight crimp?
1911smith
Member
Offline
Posts: 4663
Feedback: 100% (2)
Link To This Post
Posted: 6/22/2011 5:28:13 PM
Yes, We will address powder position and powder burn rates. Didn't plan on, but we will address some 1911 tuning issues, brass issues, and about a hundred other issues. For those interested, we're going to learn as we go. This may well be a never-ending thread. We're waiting at present for a different load that I' m working with that fills case better, also some more 1911 parts and range time.

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile
" God Bless Our Snipers ".
Jailer
Offline
Posts: 566
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 6/22/2011 8:12:48 PM
Looking forward to your future posts...............
smoketheresfire
Member
Offline
Posts: 1340
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 6/24/2011 7:33:53 PM
Originally Posted By 1911smith:
Yes, We will address powder position and powder burn rates. Didn't plan on, but we will address some 1911 tuning issues, brass issues, and about a hundred other issues. For those interested, we're going to learn as we go. This may well be a never-ending thread. We're waiting at present for a different load that I' m working with that fills case better, also some more 1911 parts and range time.

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile


I've been spending a ridiculous amount of time developing the load we discussed in the other thread. I don't have 40 hr in, but probably half that if you include research. It's been educational, thanks in large part to you.

The link to the Missouri site got me thinking, and I am pretty sure I know where you're going with this. I'm going to guess the term "obturate" is going to come up at some point.

But maybe I'm totally off base...wouldn't be the first time.
1911smith
Member
Offline
Posts: 4670
Feedback: 100% (2)
Link To This Post
Posted: 6/24/2011 8:41:10 PM
[Last Edit: 6/25/2011 12:31:19 PM by 1911smith]
"obturate" is going to come up at some point


Your lights flickering, not on just yet, but I see good things ahead for you.

Obturate was used in context of stem wave. If charge isn't enough to push bullet from barrel we have a "squibb" round. Squibbs are associated with no charge to light charge loads.

A "stem wave" or "pressure spike" is caused when powder rests below flash hole. It's speculated by companies like Smith & Wesson and Vihta Vouri . Both companies openly speak of phenomon. I talked about it some on first page. Bullets stuck in barrel for any reason is a reflection of your attention span.

Obturate

Have been working a few things this eveningfor this project, some loads, theory and timing. Takes a while to put this stuff together because:

1) There's what you know.

2) What you think you know.

3) What you know presented in such a way, so those who don't know will challenge what you know, so an intellegent conversation can be discussed.

I will share insight. Powders.... Working with IMR SR 4756, Unique, Accurate # 5. Powders I am considering Vihta Vouri 3N38, Accurate #9 and Trail Boss.

eta: time spent is investment into future fun.




Pop question.

Your published data states, a 230 grain bullet using 8.7 grains of Accurate # 5 will move at 927fps.


How many fps does 1 grain of Accurate # 5 represent ?

" God Bless Our Snipers ".
rockstar4960
got both
Online
Posts: 2556
Feedback: 100% (33)
Link To This Post
Posted: 6/27/2011 12:47:28 AM

Originally Posted By 1911smith:


Pop question.

Your published data states, a 230 grain bullet using 8.7 grains of Accurate # 5 will move at 927fps.


How many fps does 1 grain of Accurate # 5 represent ?


106.3 fps/grain @ 8.7 grains.

I'll didn't check my notes, but I'm pretty sure you get fewer fps/grain when you go to a heavier charge. (at least with higher charges)

I would be willing to guess that if one were to plot fps/grain by charge weight that you would get a parabolic curve or close to one for a given cartridge, assuming all other variables are equal.

That is pure speculation on my part, but it would fit with my very limited data.



shut your face, hippie
WTB: Colt PTO commemorative presentation case
http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=7&f=130&t=860850&page=1
StealthCRF
La Muerte con Queso
Offline
Posts: 1913
Feedback: 100% (12)
Link To This Post
Posted: 6/27/2011 1:34:32 AM
Originally Posted By rockstar4960:

Originally Posted By 1911smith:


Pop question.

Your published data states, a 230 grain bullet using 8.7 grains of Accurate # 5 will move at 927fps.


How many fps does 1 grain of Accurate # 5 represent ?


106.3 fps/grain @ 8.7 grains.

I'll didn't check my notes, but I'm pretty sure you get fewer fps/grain when you go to a heavier charge. (at least with higher charges)

I would be willing to guess that if one were to plot fps/grain by charge weight that you would get a parabolic curve or close to one for a given cartridge, assuming all other variables are equal.

That is pure speculation on my part, but it would fit with my very limited data.





charge weight to pressure (and velocity) ratio isn't linear. Would likely result in 0fps externally. On the other hand, if you stuffed 20lbs behind a slug, it still wouldn't reach the speed of light
1911smith
Member
Offline
Posts: 4745
Feedback: 100% (2)
Link To This Post
Posted: 7/14/2011 11:05:48 PM
[Last Edit: 7/14/2011 11:06:22 PM by 1911smith]
So, I'm doing more research for this thread tonite......


The level of mis-information on some very reputable, cast bullet reloading sites is absolutely maddening.


It's without a doubt no wonder why folks wonder in here so confused.
" God Bless Our Snipers ".
1911smith
Member
Offline
Posts: 4749
Feedback: 100% (2)
Link To This Post
Posted: 7/15/2011 2:30:52 PM
[Last Edit: 7/15/2011 2:35:37 PM by 1911smith]
There isn't a lot of Trail Boss information out there for 45acp and even less for 185 grain.

For those of you loading with Lee disks.

3.2 gr use .76

3.4 gr use .82

3.7 gr use .88

4.1 gr use .95

4.4 gr use 1.02

4.6 gr use 1.09

My research shows 5.5 grains being max. Still need to confirm this with Hodgdons. At 4.6 grains case is 75% full. Seating a Suters Choice bullet at 1.165 definitely compacts load.

Will post chronograph results later.


If doing your own research you will find using 185 grain lead bullets, posted charge ranges being used of 3.1 to 3.8 grains BULLSEYE.

Bullseye is definitely the most popular powder used in reduced 45acp, 185 grain, 200 grain loads.

FURTHERMORE..... I have tested IMR 4756 and Unique.

A word about Unique and reduced charges................. SPOOKY. Tried 5 grains with 5 cartridges. I could hear an audible ignition and then what sounded like a build in gas (pressure) before bullet exited barrel. Best way I can describe.

I'm satisfied with ruling Unique out. If you look in Lee's manual you will find the same charge listed for both low and high. I'm guessing there's a reason for this and it's a good one.

IMR4756 is a good powder for reduced charges starting at 600 fps, will update, later.

If anyone else wants to jump in and help with reduced charge experience, please add.

By reduced charges, I'm asking for 45acp data below 700 fps.

I couldn't believe the level of Jacktardedness researching internet threads on various forums. Someone will ask for help with reduced charge data and get lots of 45 acp, 800 fps thru 950 fps responses.

You won't find me posting in other forums. One forum is enough work for me and I'm happy to do it here.
" God Bless Our Snipers ".
BIGGDAWG
Member
Offline
Posts: 238
Feedback: 100% (33)
Link To This Post
Posted: 7/15/2011 2:52:30 PM
[Last Edit: 7/15/2011 2:54:28 PM by BIGGDAWG]
1911smith here is my light load i have worked up. shooting in my stock kimber gold match stainless

various small primer cases
winchester small primers
230gn fmj everglades bullets
4.0gn titegroup
oal 1.225

45 230gn 4.0 titegroup
1)672.1
2)685
3)685.2
4)675.7
5)673.4
6)685.8
7)679.5
8)665.3
9)685.9
10)673.7

High:685.9
Low:665.3
E.S.:20.6
Ave.:678.2
S.D.:6.8


thinking of going a little lighter and see if i can get below 600fps
1911smith
Member
Offline
Posts: 4750
Feedback: 100% (2)
Link To This Post
Posted: 7/15/2011 3:03:15 PM
Originally Posted By BIGGDAWG:
thinking of going a little lighter and see if i can get below 600fps


Thanks a bunch for sharing. I wouldn't hesitate for a minute to load your load BIGDAWG, but I would be scared (I don't use the word scared often) to try and go lower with Titegroup.

I know Titegroup isn't poaition sensitive, or not supposed to be. I'm just suggesting there are better alternatives for dipping below 600 fps.

Thanks again.


" God Bless Our Snipers ".
Jailer
Offline
Posts: 576
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 7/15/2011 3:14:01 PM
Originally Posted By BIGGDAWG:
1911smith here is my light load i have worked up. shooting in my stock kimber gold match stainless

various small primer cases
winchester small primers
230gn fmj everglades bullets
4.0gn titegroup
oal 1.225

45 230gn 4.0 titegroup
1)672.1
2)685
3)685.2
4)675.7
5)673.4
6)685.8
7)679.5
8)665.3
9)685.9
10)673.7

High:685.9
Low:665.3
E.S.:20.6
Ave.:678.2
S.D.:6.8


thinking of going a little lighter and see if i can get below 600fps


Same load and bullet weight I have some loaded at, but my OAL is 1.230 with a HAP bullet and all large primer brass was used. All crono'd right at or just below 600 when shot from a 21.
1911smith
Member
Offline
Posts: 4751
Feedback: 100% (2)
Link To This Post
Posted: 7/15/2011 4:27:03 PM
Trail Boss load data using Suters Choice 185 grain bnlswc. (Similar to Missouri Bullet Company bnlswc)

3.2 grains = 639 fps

3.4 grains = 661 fps

3.7 grains = 692 fps

4.1 grains = 731 fps

4.4 grains = 782 fps

4.6 grains = 804 fps

Barrel used, 5" Colt 1911.

I really didn't expect velocities this high. I'm working up some lower charges with a target velocity of 425fps.

On another note. The last time I ran chronograph with Bullseye charges they ran around 300 fps. Today under clear skies and 15 degrees hotter outside.

At 3.8 grains Bullseye

5 shots averaged 406 fps with ES, 24 and SD, 12.

3.8 grains Bullseye is still the load to beat. Using 11lb recoil spring and 16lb main spring
" God Bless Our Snipers ".
smoketheresfire
Member
Offline
Posts: 1387
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 7/16/2011 2:19:22 AM
I tried out the 3.7gr Bullseye and 185gr load suggested by MBC. Chrono still down, but it felt like at least 600fps. Soft enough, but nothing special.

I wonder if it has anything to do with the Federal cases I'm using. The flash hole on them is huge. IDK.

The softest load I've worked down was 5.5 of Blue Dot, but it wouldn't cycle with the stock mainspring and 12lb recoil. Plus it was hilariously dirty. Not going to cut the mustard, but it had half the recoil of the Bullseye load. Will get the range report up on the other thread when I get two spare seconds. I've been moving this week.
1911smith
Member
Offline
Posts: 4753
Feedback: 100% (2)
Link To This Post
Posted: 7/16/2011 1:11:59 PM
Originally Posted By smoketheresfire:
I tried out the 3.7gr Bullseye and 185gr load suggested by MBC. Chrono still down, but it felt like at least 600fps. Soft enough, but nothing special.

I wonder if it has anything to do with the Federal cases I'm using. The flash hole on them is huge. IDK.

The softest load I've worked down was 5.5 of Blue Dot, but it wouldn't cycle with the stock mainspring and 12lb recoil. Plus it was hilariously dirty. Not going to cut the mustard, but it had half the recoil of the Bullseye load. Will get the range report up on the other thread when I get two spare seconds. I've been moving this week.


Blue Dot is a magnim powder, making it a less than desirable choice for reduced power loads. By threads end, intent is to identify good powders for reduced power and how to set up your 1911. Have you identified what main spring your running yet ??

It's kind of hard to produce the results your asking for with a 23lb or heavier main spring. Perceived recoil is bound to feel heavy at that weight.

Real reduced recoil is tuning both 1911 and cartridge. Sorry, I can't put the feel into your hand over the interwebz. If you follow along I think you will be most pleased with outcome.

" God Bless Our Snipers ".
1911smith
Member
Offline
Posts: 4765
Feedback: 100% (2)
Link To This Post
Posted: 7/18/2011 2:53:16 PM
[Last Edit: 7/18/2011 2:55:14 PM by 1911smith]
Here's some more Lee disk data for Trail Boss.

2.9 grains = .66

2.6 grains = .61

2.4 grains = .57

2.2 grains = .53

Velocity

2.9 grains = 549 fps

2.6 grains = 494 fps

2.4 grains = 435 fps

2.2 grains = 397 fps

2.9 grains will cycle fine with 11lb recoil and 16 lb main

2.6 grains will barely cycle

2.4 and under no cycle.

Changed spring s to 7lb recoil and 15lb ISMI main spring. Using 2.2 grains Trail Boss with Winchester primers, I now have another problem with new main spring.

No ignition, primer strikes are too light. Going after Federal LPs this evening and load some more up at 2.2 grains.

Incidently, my 3lb trigger is now 1lb, 12oz's.
" God Bless Our Snipers ".
smoketheresfire
Member
Offline
Posts: 1391
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 7/18/2011 5:30:19 PM
Originally Posted By 1911smith:
Blue Dot is a magnim powder, making it a less than desirable choice for reduced power loads. By threads end, intent is to identify good powders for reduced power and how to set up your 1911. Have you identified what main spring your running yet ??

It's kind of hard to produce the results your asking for with a 23lb or heavier main spring. Perceived recoil is bound to feel heavy at that weight.

Real reduced recoil is tuning both 1911 and cartridge. Sorry, I can't put the feel into your hand over the interwebz. If you follow along I think you will be most pleased with outcome.



The Kimber's stock is 21lb, same with my Colt. Just installed a Wolff 17lb main in it, gonna see if that helps. If not, I have a 15lb on standby.

Though Blue Dot is a magnum powder, it's burn rate matches 3N38 according to VV and Alliant. It shot accurately, it just wouldn't cycle properly. Unfortunately it is so dirty that it isn't useable.

The Power Pistol load I tried (4.0gr) was promising, but needs to lose another tenth or two.
1911smith
Member
Offline
Posts: 4769
Feedback: 100% (2)
Link To This Post
Posted: 7/18/2011 5:48:10 PM
[Last Edit: 7/18/2011 5:50:09 PM by 1911smith]
Originally Posted By smoketheresfire:
Originally Posted By 1911smith:
Blue Dot is a magnum powder, making it a less than desirable choice for reduced power loads. By threads end, intent is to identify good powders for reduced power and how to set up your 1911. Have you identified what main spring your running yet ??

It's kind of hard to produce the results your asking for with a 23lb or heavier main spring. Perceived recoil is bound to feel heavy at that weight.

Real reduced recoil is tuning both 1911 and cartridge. Sorry, I can't put the feel into your hand over the interwebz. If you follow along I think you will be most pleased with outcome.



The Kimber's stock is 21lb, same with my Colt. Just installed a Wolff 17lb main in it, gonna see if that helps. If not, I have a 15lb on standby.

Though Blue Dot is a magnum powder, it's burn rate matches 3N38 according to VV and Alliant. It shot accurately, it just wouldn't cycle properly. Unfortunately it is so dirty that it isn't useable.

The Power Pistol load I tried (4.0gr) was promising, but needs to lose another tenth or two.


I've never done a thread like this one where, admittedly. I learn a lot more than before the thread. This thread is no exception. 3N38 is too slow, so is IMR 4756. Doesn't mean it can't be used. I like the idea of filling the case as much as I can. Back to Blue Dot, though it's burn rate is close the same as 3N38 it's burn characteristics are geared for magnum loads, not reduced loads.

The powder to beat is Bullseye for reduced power loads. VihtaVouri N310 is good and believe it. Titegroup is too as evidenced it's popularity on Enos's website. Titegroup has a high nitro content and when loaded in small charges like I'm loading both Bullseye and Trail Boss the concept of double ignition or stem wave clears it from my table of options. Both Bullseye and Trail Boss seem to have a safe history. Where Titegroup leaves room for question.

P.S. Trail Boss in small charge increments is dirty as all get out, the pistol I'm using has a good tune to it, so dirt isn't an issue. As far as dirt on my hands...... well gunpowder dirt smells a hell of a lot better than pig shit dirt so I can live with it.

" God Bless Our Snipers ".
Texas_Rick
American Patriot
Offline
Posts: 1781
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 7/18/2011 6:04:00 PM

Originally Posted By 1911smith:
Originally Posted By smoketheresfire:
Originally Posted By 1911smith:
Blue Dot is a magnum powder, making it a less than desirable choice for reduced power loads. By threads end, intent is to identify good powders for reduced power and how to set up your 1911. Have you identified what main spring your running yet ??

It's kind of hard to produce the results your asking for with a 23lb or heavier main spring. Perceived recoil is bound to feel heavy at that weight.

Real reduced recoil is tuning both 1911 and cartridge. Sorry, I can't put the feel into your hand over the interwebz. If you follow along I think you will be most pleased with outcome.



The Kimber's stock is 21lb, same with my Colt. Just installed a Wolff 17lb main in it, gonna see if that helps. If not, I have a 15lb on standby.

Though Blue Dot is a magnum powder, it's burn rate matches 3N38 according to VV and Alliant. It shot accurately, it just wouldn't cycle properly. Unfortunately it is so dirty that it isn't useable.

The Power Pistol load I tried (4.0gr) was promising, but needs to lose another tenth or two.


I've never done a thread like this one where, admittedly. I learn a lot more than before the thread. This thread is no exception. 3N38 is too slow, so is IMR 4756. Doesn't mean it can't be used. I like the idea of filling the case as much as I can. Back to Blue Dot, though it's burn rate is close the same as 3N38 it's burn characteristics are geared for magnum loads, not reduced loads.

The powder to beat is Bullseye for reduced power loads. VihtaVouri N310 is good and believe it. Titegroup is too as evidenced it's popularity on Enos's website. Titegroup has a high nitro content and when loaded in small charges like I'm loading both Bullseye and Trail Boss the concept of double ignition or stem wave clears it from my table of options. Both Bullseye and Trail Boss seem to have a safe history. Where Titegroup leaves room for question.

P.S. Trail Boss in small charge increments is dirty as all get out, the pistol I'm using has a good tune to it, so dirt isn't an issue. As far as dirt on my hands...... well gunpowder dirt smells a hell of a lot better than pig shit dirt so I can live with it.


1911smith, I want to thank you for this thread. As you know from my thread about low power .45 loads, this thread came to my rescue. I still have some tweaking to do but the information you posted saved me many steps.

Keep up the good work and thank you.



The Constitution of the United States is not an Ala cart menu!

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
smoketheresfire
Member
Offline
Posts: 1392
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 7/18/2011 9:59:40 PM
Originally Posted By 1911smith:
I've never done a thread like this one where, admittedly. I learn a lot more than before the thread. This thread is no exception. 3N38 is too slow, so is IMR 4756. Doesn't mean it can't be used. I like the idea of filling the case as much as I can. Back to Blue Dot, though it's burn rate is close the same as 3N38 it's burn characteristics are geared for magnum loads, not reduced loads.

The powder to beat is Bullseye for reduced power loads. VihtaVouri N310 is good and believe it. Titegroup is too as evidenced it's popularity on Enos's website. Titegroup has a high nitro content and when loaded in small charges like I'm loading both Bullseye and Trail Boss the concept of double ignition or stem wave clears it from my table of options. Both Bullseye and Trail Boss seem to have a safe history. Where Titegroup leaves room for question.

P.S. Trail Boss in small charge increments is dirty as all get out, the pistol I'm using has a good tune to it, so dirt isn't an issue. As far as dirt on my hands...... well gunpowder dirt smells a hell of a lot better than pig shit dirt so I can live with it.



Was at the local used book store today and picked up the Lee manual. His takes on reduced loads are informative.

Interesting math, too. I'm gonna try to incorporate some of that into my next loading session. Had I read that stuff earlier, I would have definitely skipped Blue Dot.

This has been a great thread. Inspired me to get out there and expand my understanding of what's actually going on inside th chamber. Thanks.
1911smith
Member
Offline
Posts: 4862
Feedback: 100% (2)
Link To This Post
Posted: 7/28/2011 4:42:53 PM
[Last Edit: 7/28/2011 4:57:36 PM by 1911smith]
Ok, my turn to ask questions ?

Who's actually followed this with load work of their own ??

How far have you gotten ??

How far do you want to go ??

Sure, I'm fine with doing these pieces for the sake of entertainment. There's a lot more work involved to tuning a load and pistol than we've covered. IF, I am to pursue this further it will have to be with some participation from a few of you.

It won't be easy to follow, require a whole lot of time on your part, possibly cost a few dollars in parts and tools.

I'm not asking for faith in anything I give for information. In fact you shouldn't have faith in what I say or do at all, ever.

What this will require is faith in yourself, your ability to do your own research and work.

If you screw something up, it is of course on you. I will show how I do things with my pistols and how I load for me. Input from those with more experience is of course appreciated and welcomed from those who are "lurking". Really, input from any experience level is very much appreciated.

So let's here from at least two. If we have two of you, who are following along with work of your own or would like too, chime in. I will say this, this piece will move along as fast as the participation. I won't get ahead of the slowest participant.
" God Bless Our Snipers ".
Texas_Rick
American Patriot
Offline
Posts: 1802
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 7/31/2011 3:58:42 PM
[Last Edit: 7/31/2011 3:59:47 PM by Texas_Rick]
I've followed this thread and have been doing testing of my own.
Round two of low recoil load was today and the results are:

Gun: STI Spartan
Caliber: 45 ACP
Bullet: Hornady 185 XTP
Powder: Bullseye
Load: 4.4gn
OAL: 1.250

Edit to add Primer: WLP

Target: 40 feet
Shot string: 10 rounds

Average: 690fps
ES: 45
SD: 15.2


The Constitution of the United States is not an Ala cart menu!

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
1911smith
Member
Offline
Posts: 4888
Feedback: 100% (2)
Link To This Post
Posted: 7/31/2011 4:48:35 PM
[Last Edit: 7/31/2011 4:51:05 PM by 1911smith]
What a coincidence, I tested same load yesterday at range using assorted brass, Federal primers, Nosler 185 grain bullets and 4.4 grains bullseye.

OAL 1.210, CMOD .471

Tested load with 21lb main and 13lb recoil.

The only problem expererienced was center of target kept blowing out, regardless of distance.




It's just as important to list springs used as cartridge components. Changing spring weight combinations can either open or close your groups.


Also, if you want to round out the experience for everyone it's important to share feed information. Did every cartridge feed ?
" God Bless Our Snipers ".
Texas_Rick
American Patriot
Offline
Posts: 1806
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 7/31/2011 5:08:04 PM

Originally Posted By 1911smith:
What a coincidence, I tested same load yesterday at range using assorted brass, Federal primers, Nosler 185 grain bullets and 4.4 grains bullseye.

OAL 1.210, CMOD .471

Tested load with 21lb main and 13lb recoil.

The only problem expererienced was center of target kept blowing out, regardless of distance.




It's just as important to list springs used as cartridge components. Changing spring weight combinations can either open or close your groups.


Also, if you want to round out the experience for everyone it's important to share feed information. Did every cartridge feed ?


Using the same load last test, OAL was 1.270 and would not feed. I loaded this batch to 1.250 and all fed well in Chip Mcormick 10 round power mags. Not a single hiccup.

I gained about 12fps by setting the bullet back 0.020 and ES and SD dropped to what I posted.

Gun still has stock springs. 18lb recoil spring/full length guide rod. I wanted to test this load before I started respringing the gun but I am very happy with the results so far.

Brass hit the ground at 4:00 over my right shoulder about 2-3 feet from me.

The Constitution of the United States is not an Ala cart menu!

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
1911smith
Member
Offline
Posts: 4889
Feedback: 100% (2)
Link To This Post
Posted: 7/31/2011 5:28:50 PM
We've tons more to cover, but sounds as if your pistol and cartridges are tuned very well.


I want to make a statement before going any further..... 600 fps is slow enough, any thing slower and your risking failure...............


I'm fooling around in the basement with 2.1 grains Trail Boss. Everything at 400 fps has to be perfect. Grip, stance, pistol, cartridge, all has to be perfect.

When we get done with springs, we will visit OCD cartridge tuning like you can't imagine.


Still would like to see one more person involved.

I keep for springs 15, 16, 17, 19, 21, and 23 pound mainsprings Recoil in 7,8,10,11,12, 13, 15, 17, 18, 18.5, 19, 20, and 21 pounders

" God Bless Our Snipers ".
Page:  / 4