Quote History Quoted:
I believe the intent was to in effect camo the weapon and not so much "distress" it. The base colors were drawn from several popular camo patterns and blended together to give the customer something other than multicam/kryptek.
View Quote
I'm sorry, I really don't mean to snipe you or the painter, because I really do think it looks awesome from a pure aesthetic standpoint - but as camouflage, IMHO, the paint scheme makes even less sense...
For a camouflage applications - the basic "point" is usually to break up the outline of whatever it is being camouflaged, and some employ the secondary mechanism of trying to actually blend in to the expected environment.
On the guns pictured - the different color components of the paint scheme appear to be muted and blended, and lack contrast between the greens, blacks, and tans that would "overpower" the natural perceptions of the gun's outline and surface features and details by obscuring or altering shadows and highlights making it more difficult for the brain to recognize the item.
At the same time, the "washes" and "highlighting" are fairly extensive and high contrast - which is a technique specifically used to
accentuate the outline of a particular item - rendering not less, but more recognizable to the casual observer.
As just a unique "look," it appears to be fairly well done - but in terms of functional camouflage - while I'm only seeing it in photographs against a stark, white background - functionally, it seems to be less effective camouflage than (e.g.) a factory stock FDE SCAR-17S would have been.
~Augee