User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 9/7/2015 8:10:26 PM EDT
AR-15 A2 Sporter II
Converted my ballistics. Looks real clean  |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2015 9:04:43 PM EDT
[#1]
$14.5-16k. Though if that's the one I think it is....
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2015 9:13:21 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted: $14.5-16k. Though if that's the one I think it is.... I am not sure I told you about this one. If you look hard you can see my Colt on the counter below it. Do I really need another M-16? This one is on the lower end of your range Tony. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2015 9:15:36 PM EDT
[#3]
One of the better AUTO add-ons I have seen. Tony is in the ballpark.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2015 10:40:03 PM EDT
[#4]
That's a very nice, clean conversion. Buy it!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/7/2015 10:50:28 PM EDT
[#5]
Buy it or send me the info
It does look clean. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/8/2015 1:01:30 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I am not sure I told you about this one. If you look hard you can see my Colt on the counter below it. Do I really need another M-16?
This one is on the lower end of your range Tony. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
$14.5-16k. Though if that's the one I think it is.... I am not sure I told you about this one. If you look hard you can see my Colt on the counter below it. Do I really need another M-16?
This one is on the lower end of your range Tony. I think we talked about that RR, or one like it, a few weeks ago. Check your IMs.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/8/2015 1:45:46 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I think we talked about that RR, or one like it, a few weeks ago. Check your IMs. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: $14.5-16k. Though if that's the one I think it is.... I am not sure I told you about this one. If you look hard you can see my Colt on the counter below it. Do I really need another M-16? This one is on the lower end of your range Tony. I think we talked about that RR, or one like it, a few weeks ago. Check your IMs. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/8/2015 3:04:01 PM EDT
[#8]
Most AR15 conversion rifles are going for $16-19k these days.
Surprisingly it doesnt seem to be much difference if its a Colt or Non-colt. Typically you would think Colt would carry a premium but most of the Colt Ar15 are slab side and not very desirable based on their looks. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/8/2015 3:16:40 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Most AR15 conversion rifles are going for $16-19k these days. Surprisingly it doesnt seem to be much difference if its a Colt or Non-colt. Typically you would think Colt would carry a premium but most of the Colt Ar15 are slab side and not very desirable based on their looks. The looks of the slab side don't bother me -- a more significant difference is that the Colt front takedown pin is oversize and not captive. Still, you can have M60joe sleeve it down, but it won't be captive. That said, I prefer a Colt host because it is far more in-spec than any of the non-Colt hosts available pre-1986. In decades of tinkering with RRs, I have only come across one ex-semi Colt with a functional issue -- the autosear pin hole was drilled slightly off by the person who did the Form 1 -- and that was very easily fixed. Compare that to the host of issues I've seen non-Colts need (though in fairness, by now many of those have been corrected). YMMV. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/8/2015 7:57:19 PM EDT
[#10]
Looks like a very nice conversion.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2015 1:23:08 AM EDT
[#11]
doesn't FCG use oversize pins too?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/12/2015 8:34:16 AM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
doesn't FCG use oversize pins too? I believe that began in the 1990s with Blue Label guns, so no converted transferable Colts should have the larger 0.170" diam hammer/trigger pins. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/18/2015 11:17:39 PM EDT
[#13]
I'd much rather have a Colt than any knock-off brand
There are too many dimensional problems with the knock offs |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2015 8:00:58 AM EDT
[#14]
for the right price I would buy a sp1/sp2 lower. but id rather buy a non colt and have it fixed. there not a lot of material one that front pin lug and I would think machine gun fire would speed up wear on a already thin section of the lower. I hate that colt screwed up lowers the way they did, but I guess Olympic is the same when they couldn't machine a lower to spec lol.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/19/2015 9:11:49 AM EDT
[#15]
I have one identical to this converted by the same person. I thought about having the front take down hole sleeved, but it really doesn't make much difference since I usually keep one upper on it with a conversion pin.
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
