Site Notices
7/28/2014 11:40:43 AM
Author
Message
emrisg
Offline
Posts: 237
Feedback: 100% (17)
Posted: 3/21/2013 10:19:24 PM
What is the consensus on the best rate reducing buffer? I have a rr colt m16a1 with rifle stock, usgi spring, standard rifle buffer now. Upper is colt with carbine gas system an 16 hbar.

Thanks
BRADLEYBUILT
Offline
Posts: 3074
Feedback: 100% (26)
Link To This Post
Posted: 3/22/2013 12:34:16 AM
I realy like the Enidine, then the MGI. Dont waist your money on the AAC buffer. It isnt worth the $. Ive use the Enidine mostly and the MGI from time to time with standard carbine spring. ROF of around 700 with the Enidine and MGI. The roll pin in the mgi can drift out so weld, or pin prick it in place when new.
gmtmaster
Online
Posts: 11868
Feedback: 100% (5)
Link To This Post
Posted: 3/22/2013 12:48:08 AM
MGI ia all you need to know.
gmtmaster
Online
Posts: 11869
Feedback: 100% (5)
Link To This Post
Posted: 3/22/2013 12:49:10 AM
Originally Posted By BRADLEYBUILT:
I realy like the Enidine, then the MGI. Dont waist your money on the AAC buffer. It isnt worth the $. Ive use the Enidine mostly and the MGI from time to time with standard carbine spring. ROF of around 700 with the Enidine and MGI. The roll pin in the mgi can drift out so weld, or pin prick it in place when new.


I have not experienced that issue.
emrisg
Offline
Posts: 239
Feedback: 100% (17)
Link To This Post
Posted: 3/22/2013 7:42:25 AM
Thanks
Samuel_Hoggson
Offline
Posts: 1546
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 3/22/2013 3:29:28 PM
Replacing a roll pin is nothing. A hydraulic leak would bother me alot more.

To be fair, both the Enidine and MGI are well regarded. Kinda like Eotech and Aimpoint.

There is a test somewhere in the archives that showed the MGI lowered ROF more. I think you'd be happy either way.

Sam
Eukatae
Member
Offline
Posts: 4532
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 3/24/2013 1:48:40 AM
I have both... I use both, but to be flat out honest the MGI lives in my favorite lower Enidine lives in the one that never leaves the safe.
Dedeye
Offline
Posts: 996
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 3/24/2013 8:03:23 AM
The most rate reduction I have gotten is with the old LMG hydraulic buffer. The second best (by 15 RPM) is the AAC Super Slow rate reducer. Both require the full-length buffer tube.
Stahlgewehr762
Offline
Posts: 1220
Feedback: 100% (12)
Link To This Post
Posted: 3/27/2013 2:59:30 AM
I like the Enidine, it reduces the cyclic rate significantly (when compared to the carbine, H, H2, and H3 buffers), while concurrently affecting a very noticeable decrease in muzzle rise. The progressively heavier H2 and H3 buffers do reduce the cyclic rate some, but their added weight makes the rifle feel "bouncy", whereas this condition is not present when using the Enidine buffer. The recoil reduction of the Enidine is even noticeable on semi-auto, as it removes the slight "thump" you normally get when the bolt carrier and buffer bottom out at the end of the recoil cycle. You can really notice this in "before and after" testing of the rifle. Basically, the Enidine works like a shock-absorber, preventing the bolt carrier from "bottoming out" harshly every time you fire a shot. The Enidine also has a total weight of 4.3 oz., which is about the same weight as an H2 buffer (4.7 oz.).

The MGI Rate Reducing Buffer has a total weight of 7.1 oz., which is significantly heavier than even the standard rifle buffer (5.15 oz.). The MGI's weight is similar to some of the heavier 9mm buffers, which have been known to break bolt catches. I have found NO reports of bolt catch breakages when using the MGI RRB, so I will assume this is not an issue. I have heard a few reports of the MGI's roll pin migrating (coming out), which could gouge up the inside of the buffer tube if not discovered in time. I don't think the roll pin could come out far enough to allow the MGI buffer to actually fall apart, as the buffer tube would be the limit stop to this movement. I wonder why MGI doesn't just use a pressed-in solid pin, or at least a coiled style roll pin in their buffer. It's not like it needs to be disassembled on a regular basis, which would be a sound reason for using a roll pin.

I personally would rather use the lighter buffer which works as well (the Enidine), if for no other reason than to reduce the amount of weight being being stopped by the bolt catch. Keep in mind that the bolt catch is attached to the expensive lower receiver, and the impact from the cycling mass hitting the bolt catch is transferred directly to the lower receiver. There is obviously a threshold for damage in this regard, but I'd prefer to be as far away from that point as possible.

As Tony would write: "YMMV " .
jhud
theres no way to control it, its totally automatic
Offline
Posts: 11260
Feedback: 100% (270)
Link To This Post
Posted: 3/28/2013 12:35:06 PM
I like the Endine. With a 10" barrel and carbine stock, muzzle rise is nothing. Pulling off a two round shot is easy as pie.
It's not paranoia if there really is somebody after you.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Different explorers draw different maps.
TaylorWSO
Kool-aid
Offline
Posts: 17116
Feedback: 100% (10)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/3/2013 5:01:43 PM
Enidines suck ass.

Ive replaced 2 and have a 3rd broken on in a drawer



Anything is possible, everything is temporary
ReefRaider
Member
Online
Posts: 6251
Feedback: 100% (212)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/7/2013 7:36:28 PM
While I have never tested it. But I think someone here did. The Vltor A5 receiver extension has 3 buffer weight's available. Seems to me like their heavy buffer did more to slow the ROF than anything else has. I use the standard buffer in the A5. Everyone that has shot it seems to think the ROF is just right . Two guys even put them on their M16 after shooting mine. YMMV
"There is a fine line between having balls and being a dumb ass" GB

"Machine Gunners - Accuracy By Volume"

tony_k
How was I to know she was with the Russians, too?
Offline
Posts: 11419
Feedback: 100% (8)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/7/2013 8:49:09 PM
Originally Posted By ReefRaider:
While I have never tested it. But I think someone here did. The Vltor A5 receiver extension has 3 buffer weight's available. Seems to me like their heavy buffer did more to slow the ROF than anything else has. I use the standard buffer in the A5. Everyone that has shot it seems to think the ROF is just right . Two guys even put them on their M16 after shooting mine. YMMV

Actually, Vltor has made five different buffer weights for the A5 (I have them all). IIRC, only three are listed on the web site, but last I heard the other two were still available via special order by phone.

That said, I've never had reason to play with anything other than the standard buffer, but I'm the sort of guy who, if they make five weights, I have to have all five .....
This is Tony K, and I approved this message.
ReefRaider
Member
Online
Posts: 6252
Feedback: 100% (212)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/7/2013 9:06:24 PM
Originally Posted By tony_k:
Originally Posted By ReefRaider:
While I have never tested it. But I think someone here did. The Vltor A5 receiver extension has 3 buffer weight's available. Seems to me like their heavy buffer did more to slow the ROF than anything else has. I use the standard buffer in the A5. Everyone that has shot it seems to think the ROF is just right . Two guys even put them on their M16 after shooting mine. YMMV

Actually, Vltor has made five different buffer weights for the A5 (I have them all). IIRC, only three are listed on the web site, but last I heard the other two were still available via special order by phone.

That said, I've never had reason to play with anything other than the standard buffer, but I'm the sort of guy who, if they make five weights, I have to have all five .....


Would you run them over a postal scale ? So we can see the differance between them Could the two heavy ones be for 6.8 and or 7.62X39??
"There is a fine line between having balls and being a dumb ass" GB

"Machine Gunners - Accuracy By Volume"

tony_k
How was I to know she was with the Russians, too?
Offline
Posts: 11420
Feedback: 100% (8)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/7/2013 9:32:24 PM
Reef, I've got the weights listed from back when I bought 'em .... crazy busy right now, give me a day or two and I'll look them up.
This is Tony K, and I approved this message.
tony_k
How was I to know she was with the Russians, too?
Offline
Posts: 11421
Feedback: 100% (8)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/7/2013 9:44:02 PM
[Last Edit: 4/7/2013 10:01:02 PM by tony_k]
The Vltor factory A5 buffers I have are A5H0 (3.8 oz), A5H1 (4.56 oz), A5H2 (5.33 oz), A5H3 (6.08 oz) and A5H4 (6.83 oz).
This is Tony K, and I approved this message.
benelliwangM3
Offline
Posts: 327
Feedback: 100% (5)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/8/2013 1:15:00 AM
[Last Edit: 4/11/2013 4:29:53 PM by benelliwangM3]
This link shows the Vltor A5 stock on 11.5" carbine gas & 14.5" mid length gas system. It is one the with standard weight buffer.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOE-xJ9F9hk
BRADLEYBUILT
Offline
Posts: 3217
Feedback: 100% (26)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/8/2013 9:25:26 AM
Originally Posted By benelliwangM3:
This link shows the Vltor A5 stock on 11.5" carbine gas & 14.5" mid length gas system. It is one the stand weight buffer.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOE-xJ9F9hk


WOW those guns sure look uncontrollable. Recoil is surely throwing the muzzle all over.
sardo_67
Game Changer
Offline
Posts: 3757
Feedback: 100% (34)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/10/2013 12:34:55 AM
[Last Edit: 4/10/2013 12:37:35 AM by sardo_67]
i don't remember which one he had in there but it was a hydraulic buffer of some type on the first gun with the 7in upper with pistol length gas system. very easy to control and was firing some Silver bear 55gr FMJ

the 2nd one was a PAWS converted SP1 and normal M4 type buffer on my 11in carbine gas system upper with M4-2000 can. little harder to control (im in white) as i wasn't used to firing that one but i'm good now.
that one was some type of brass ammo, American eagle i think.

I did love my job, working hard is what K9s do…. I was born for it, I lived for it, and died for it; for my country….but mostly for you.
IDD Sgt Streaker (R556) KIA 11-15-2011 Helmand Afg
benelliwangM3
Offline
Posts: 328
Feedback: 100% (5)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/11/2013 4:29:16 PM
Originally Posted By BRADLEYBUILT:
Originally Posted By benelliwangM3:
This link shows the Vltor A5 stock on 11.5" carbine gas & 14.5" mid length gas system. It is one the stand weight buffer.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOE-xJ9F9hk


WOW those guns sure look uncontrollable. Recoil is surely throwing the muzzle all over.


Not sure we are looking at the same video, with the 14.5" barrel, that is a 90lb kid doing mag dump, his stance is not all that great neither. Muzzle climb is well controlled.

On the 11.5" barrel, the shooter is new to the sport and he has never shot a full auto gun before. So his stance was leaned way back back and it looked bad. Once he learned the proper stance, he was hitting good with bursts.
BRADLEYBUILT
Offline
Posts: 3243
Feedback: 100% (26)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/12/2013 1:03:29 AM
[Last Edit: 4/12/2013 1:11:07 AM by BRADLEYBUILT]
Her is my M16 with a first time shooter. Now yes he is just a bit heavier than 90lbs, and stance is ok. Notice he is barley holding onto the handguard. This was with a enidine buffer with a over gassed 11.5 carbine upper, and standard carbine buffer tube. Very easy to control, and check out that ROF I do think your middy is a lot smoother!
benelliwangM3
Offline
Posts: 329
Feedback: 100% (5)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/12/2013 3:08:41 AM
I don't mang, your first time shooter definitely looks at least 92lbs lol

Your rate is definitely slower than mine. I don't know where mine is at, need to buy a pac timer and check it out one day.
emrisg
Offline
Posts: 243
Feedback: 100% (17)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/12/2013 5:14:43 PM
What is the best timer to get that will show your rof?
Armory » M-16