Author
Message
DiazOsos
Offline
Posts: 1
Feedback: 0% (0)
Posted: 6/28/2012 3:03:04 PM

THE IMAGE ABOVE IS A PAID ADVERTISEMENT
Can anyone recommend a good quality lower parts set, trigger ( comp or not ) pin set and buffer ? It will be on a Sendra rr and 10.5-11.5 gas impeng. Flat top upper . Please keep in mind it will be a shooter and in a dusty environment . It doesn't have to be the supper high speed low drag mall ninja edition . Just practical and reliable.
Has anyone run the comp. style triggers on select/fa ? What buffer /spring combos are available to safely play with cycle rates? I'm sorry in advance for asking so many questions that y'all have probably discussed in detail. Although this isn't my first nfa purchase its my first m16 and I just want to be diligent in my research. Any and all advise is appreciated.
Thanks

PS, I will be running a m4-2000 can on occasions
MP15T
Member
NRA
Online
Posts: 6219
Feedback: 100% (54)
Link To This Post
Posted: 6/28/2012 3:59:39 PM
I would recommend getting all new Colt internals and a set of KNS anti-rotation pins.

I personally run the stock Colt trigger in my M16 RR as it is just a range do for doing mag dumps.

Original Colt parts can be bought a Brownells and Specialized Armament.

http://www.specializedarmament.com/catalog/AR_15_Parts-4-0.html

http://www.brownells.com/.aspx/pid=0/sid=853/schematicsdetail/M16-M4-Lower-Receiver-Fire-Control-Full-Auto
GunDisaster
Member
Offline
Posts: 5320
Feedback: 100% (3)
Link To This Post
Posted: 6/28/2012 4:09:11 PM
Yeah Colt makes nice parts for sure. I've also used regular cheaper M-16 parts kits from SOG Armory and DPMS and other places with no issues though. I run regular buffer springs, but prefer heavier buffers like a H3 or 9mm buffer. If you want to reduce the cycle rate I'd get an MGI buffer. My favorite trigger is the JP Adjustable single stage trigger for my M-16, but the stock trigger also works just fine. Honestly if you are familiar with AR-15's the M-16 is just like it but has a happy switch, so all your AR-15 knowledge still applies. Then more you shoot your M-16 the more you'll learn about it. And of course KNS pins are nice to protect your expensive lower and also make the trigger pull smoother.
tony_k
How was I to know she was with the Russians, too?
Offline
Posts: 10868
Feedback: 100% (7)
Link To This Post
Posted: 6/28/2012 4:12:43 PM
I run a JP trigger and Colt factory disconnector, hammer, selector and autosear, with JP springs. This combo has worked for me for more than 50k rounds over the last 15 or so years; I've replaced the springs twice, but there is zero wear on everything else.
This is Tony K, and I approved this message.
sleepdr
Snake oil salesman
Offline
Posts: 6560
Feedback: 100% (18)
Link To This Post
Posted: 6/28/2012 6:48:22 PM
[Last Edit: 6/28/2012 6:50:54 PM by sleepdr]
Originally Posted By tony_k:
I run a JP trigger and Colt factory disconnector, hammer, selector and autosear, with JP springs. This combo has worked for me for more than 50k rounds over the last 15 or so years; I've replaced the springs twice, but there is zero wear on everything else.


Interesting. I got to test drive my Colt for the first time today and discovered that the OEM trigger is pretty bad. It probably will improve since it's not even remotely broken in. Another guy's well used factory had a much better pull in semi & auto. I'm already spoiled by the Geissele SSA, so was planning to go with an SSF for the RR. Aside from the 1 vs 2 stage differences, can you compare & contrast your setup with an SSF? How hard is it to modify the JP stuff to work with auto FCG parts?

When my Form 4 clears, hopefully before 2013, I may try your setup.


Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile
Like fine herbs, dreams only develop their full fragrance when crushed and ground into a fine powder.
-LowBeta
tony_k
How was I to know she was with the Russians, too?
Offline
Posts: 10869
Feedback: 100% (7)
Link To This Post
Posted: 6/28/2012 9:31:56 PM
[Last Edit: 6/28/2012 9:33:24 PM by tony_k]
The JP does not require any modifications. You install it, adjust it, and Locktite it. Done. I've installed a bunch of 'em with new Colt FA parts, and the Colt parts have not needed any fitting, either. However, both DPMS and Bushy FC parts require fitting with the JP, but then again, I have never come across a non-Colt FA FCG which did not require some fitting and filing, which is why I stick with the plug-and-play Colt FCGs.

The Gisselle is pre-fitted from the factory ...but it is also three times the cost. And since you set the engagement and over travel when you install the JP, it is much easier to set up exactly the way you want it. The Gisselle, ITOH, if you want to adjust anything, you have to go through the same process as the JP.

FWIW, in my M16s, I rarely put the selector in semi. With a crisp, light JP trigger, if I want to fire one shot, I do it with trigger control, instead of moving the selector. And both the JP and Gisselle are single-stage when set to AUTO.

FWIW. YMMV.
This is Tony K, and I approved this message.
DiazOsos
Offline
Posts: 2
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 6/29/2012 12:17:37 AM
Thanks for the wisdom and knowledge. I'm new to this board and it seems to be the jackpot of real world information already. I would like to say after I test fired the gun ( my sot was nice enough to let me have a test fire) it seemed to have the same cycle rate with several different uppers. Which I thought was kinda slow. They ranged from 10.5 to 16. Is this common? I kinda like the higher cycle rate guns like the Nam era XMs
Just for your information this is a completely unsolicited thank you to Guns Plus in Georgetown Texas. My much preferred sot. Great guys that aren't self important or have the personality of a wet rag. I can't say enough for good customer service and willingness to help. Thank you Kyle and Stephen.
Still open to advise and comments, Thanks again
cosmos556
Someone completely forgettable
Military
Offline
Posts: 12770
Feedback: 100% (76)
Link To This Post
Posted: 6/29/2012 7:44:32 AM
Originally Posted By DiazOsos:
Thanks for the wisdom and knowledge. I'm new to this board and it seems to be the jackpot of real world information already. I would like to say after I test fired the gun ( my sot was nice enough to let me have a test fire) it seemed to have the same cycle rate with several different uppers. Which I thought was kinda slow. They ranged from 10.5 to 16. Is this common? I kinda like the higher cycle rate guns like the Nam era XMs
Just for your information this is a completely unsolicited thank you to Guns Plus in Georgetown Texas. My much preferred sot. Great guys that aren't self important or have the personality of a wet rag. I can't say enough for good customer service and willingness to help. Thank you Kyle and Stephen.
Still open to advise and comments, Thanks again


What is your stock/buffer setup?
"I'd like a milksteak boiled over hard and an order of your finest jellybeans served raw." ~Charlie Kelly
tony_k
How was I to know she was with the Russians, too?
Offline
Posts: 10870
Feedback: 100% (7)
Link To This Post
Posted: 6/29/2012 1:42:43 PM
[Last Edit: 6/29/2012 1:44:35 PM by tony_k]
Originally Posted By DiazOsos:
I would like to say after I test fired the gun ( my sot was nice enough to let me have a test fire) it seemed to have the same cycle rate with several different uppers. Which I thought was kinda slow. They ranged from 10.5 to 16. Is this common? I kinda like the higher cycle rate guns like the Nam era XMs

Gene Stoner originally designed the full-auto AR15 with an ROF of about 450 rounds per minute. After the initial military trials, he was asked to speed it up, and the resulting ARs/M16s had a ROF of 650 to 700 rpm depending on configuration.

The variables that determine ROF are the gas pulse (adjusted primarily by changing the size of the gas port), buffer weight, and ammo. However, when the carbines came along, the shorter gas tube and shorter recoil pulse made gas port size critical, and you can't do much there if you want it to run reliably. To get very far out of the milspec ROF range and maintain reliabity, you'll have the best luck with a rifle buttstock and 20" barrel.

You can still do a lot in a carbine configuration with buffer weights –– between solid, mechanical and hydraulic buffers in varying weights, you've got a dozen to choose from. But not all will run with all uppers, so you do need to experiment. I've got more than a dozen different buffers in my toolbox for debugging. With an in-spec upper, I can usually get the ROF up around 825 or so with just the right buffer, and maintain reliability.

Of course, you can also shoot the hottest ammo you can find –– that'll speed it up.

A final note: I generally run mine at 685 rpm. That seems to be the sweet spot for my applications, and in addition, it can still be fired accurately (it will hold Minute of Target Car at shoots). The faster you push it, the more the target area opens up and thus accuracy goes out the window. In addition, the higher the ROF, the faster the upper heats up. Even when you bring multiple uppers (which I do recommend), a high ROF can hold you to a couple of mags before you start melting gas tubes. A slower ROF allows more shooting between either cooling-off periods, or melted gas tubes.

Hope this is of some help.
This is Tony K, and I approved this message.
DiazOsos
Offline
Posts: 3
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 6/29/2012 1:43:36 PM
Its a standard crbine tube spring and buffer. H2 I think
jbntex
Offline
Posts: 1401
Feedback: 86% (7)
Link To This Post
Posted: 6/29/2012 9:58:13 PM
Normally shorter barrels run faster than longer ones (all else being equal) but that is not always the case. The primary drivers of ROF (in my opinion) is the gas port size, followed by recoil spring weight.

You can always tame down any given ROF by adding mass to the system (i.e. a heavier buffer) or by putting in a weaker spring like an AAC rate reducing spring.

To increase the ROF without monkeying with the gas port size you have two options.

A. Remove Mass from the system by going with a lighter buffer. Since you are already running a pretty light buffer your only remaining safe option is a standard H.

The upside to this option is it is cheap (like $30 bucks for an H buffer).
The downside is that you could end up with "bolt bounce" now that you have a lighter amount of reciprocal mass inside the buffer as an H buffer has two steel & 1 tungsten weight vs 1 steel and 2 tunsten in a H2.
Unfortunately there is no way to predict whether you will have a bolt bounce issue now or when you upper and BGC gets more broken in.

B. You could put in a stronger recoil spring to speed up the bolt return speed.
Once again the upside to try this is cheap ($30ish)
The downside is that you will need enough gas to compress the recoil spring and the only way to find out is to put a stronger spring and see if it works. If you dont have enough gas to compress the new extra power spring completely you will end up with a short stroke condition.

So for roughly $60 you could invest in an H buffer and a Sprinco enhanced (aka blue spring) or extra power (aka red spring) and experiment and see what happens to the ROF using one the other or both in conjunction.

If either of those options fail to produce the desired results or induce reliability issues, than you only option is to drill the gas port out until the desired ROF is acheived along with proper reliability. Obviously, there is going to be a point of diminishing returns where you are only going to be able to boost the ROF on a M16 to a certain level and maintain any sort of reliability. i.e. if you want MAC speed than you probably are going to need to by a MAC. However, anything between 650 and 900 is pretty safely acheivable if you go slow and don't do anything drastic.

If you need help I am in Central Texas as well and could help you out at one of the local ranges once your transfer is complete.

I have just about every "normal" buffer there is (Carbine, H, H2, H3, B, X), as well as Colt OEM M4 springs, both Sprinco springs (blue & red) and well as AAC reduced power springs, and have every gas port drill bit from wire size 55 to 35 if you want to drill it one wire size at a time.

Just shoot me an IM once your transfer comes through if you need or want help and we can figure out a time to meet.

James

DiazOsos
Offline
Posts: 4
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 6/29/2012 10:23:55 PM
im sent
emrisg
Offline
Posts: 211
Feedback: 100% (17)
Link To This Post
Posted: 6/30/2012 10:34:42 AM
Would using a 16 inch barrel with a carbine length gas system on a a2 lower with rifle stock and buffer make the gun run faster?
tony_k
How was I to know she was with the Russians, too?
Offline
Posts: 10874
Feedback: 100% (7)
Link To This Post
Posted: 6/30/2012 3:29:53 PM
Originally Posted By emrisg:
Would using a 16 inch barrel with a carbine length gas system on a a2 lower with rifle stock and buffer make the gun run faster?

All other things being equal, it would run slower with a rifle stock/buffer than when using a collapsible stock with most carbine buffers. Because carbine receiver extensions/springs/buffers are shorter than their rifle counterparts, in effect they short-stroke compared to the rifle system. And a shorter stroke speeds up the ROF (just like putting a buffer in an Uzi speeds it up by shortening the stroke). And yes, I know one is open-boltand the other closed-bolt, but the principle stands.

YMMV.
This is Tony K, and I approved this message.
Circuits
Member
Offline
Posts: 6110
Feedback: 100% (21)
Link To This Post
Posted: 6/30/2012 9:48:08 PM
[Last Edit: 6/30/2012 9:48:52 PM by Circuits]
Originally Posted By tony_k:
Because carbine receiver extensions/springs/buffers are shorter than their rifle counterparts, in effect they short-stroke compared to the rifle system. And a shorter stroke speeds up the ROF (just like putting a buffer in an Uzi speeds it up by shortening the stroke). And yes, I know one is open-boltand the other closed-bolt, but the principle stands.


Shorter buffer, but also a shorter tube, so not a shorter stroke, Tony. Stroke length is exactly the same, and bounded by the carrier key and the inside of the upper receiver.

Shorties are faster because of less spring and less moving mass.
"The only real difference between the men and the boys, is the number and size, and cost of their toys."
NRA Life, GOA Life, CSSA Life, NRA Certified Instructor, FFL/SOT 07/C2
tony_k
How was I to know she was with the Russians, too?
Offline
Posts: 10876
Feedback: 100% (7)
Link To This Post
Posted: 6/30/2012 10:40:43 PM
Originally Posted By Circuits:
Originally Posted By tony_k:
Because carbine receiver extensions/springs/buffers are shorter than their rifle counterparts, in effect they short-stroke compared to the rifle system. And a shorter stroke speeds up the ROF (just like putting a buffer in an Uzi speeds it up by shortening the stroke). And yes, I know one is open-boltand the other closed-bolt, but the principle stands.


Shorter buffer, but also a shorter tube, so not a shorter stroke, Tony. Stroke length is exactly the same, and bounded by the carrier key and the inside of the upper receiver.

Shorties are faster because of less spring and less moving mass.

If the stroke length is exactly the same, why is the carbine spring shorter than the rifle spring? There definitely is a difference in dwell time. That's why the Vltor A5 system works in applications where the carbine system does not: It uses a rifle recoil spring, unlike the carbine receiver extensions.

we may just have to disagree on this one.
This is Tony K, and I approved this message.
Circuits
Member
Offline
Posts: 6113
Feedback: 100% (21)
Link To This Post
Posted: 7/3/2012 2:39:40 AM
Originally Posted By tony_k:
If the stroke length is exactly the same, why is the carbine spring shorter than the rifle spring? There definitely is a difference in dwell time. That's why the Vltor A5 system works in applications where the carbine system does not: It uses a rifle recoil spring, unlike the carbine receiver extensions.

we may just have to disagree on this one.


Shorter tube needs shorter spring, too, of course. I went and measured the stroke length of four full-stock and three telestock rifles, and they're all the same - about 3 3/4"
"The only real difference between the men and the boys, is the number and size, and cost of their toys."
NRA Life, GOA Life, CSSA Life, NRA Certified Instructor, FFL/SOT 07/C2
sleepdr
Snake oil salesman
Offline
Posts: 6571
Feedback: 100% (18)
Link To This Post
Posted: 7/3/2012 10:26:48 AM
[Last Edit: 7/3/2012 10:59:48 AM by sleepdr]
Originally Posted By Circuits:
Originally Posted By tony_k:
If the stroke length is exactly the same, why is the carbine spring shorter than the rifle spring? There definitely is a difference in dwell time. That's why the Vltor A5 system works in applications where the carbine system does not: It uses a rifle recoil spring, unlike the carbine receiver extensions.

we may just have to disagree on this one.


Shorter tube needs shorter spring, too, of course. I went and measured the stroke length of four full-stock and three telestock rifles, and they're all the same - about 3 3/4"


IIRC, the spring length doesn't have bearing on the stroke length of the system. It's been a while since I studied spring physics, so my post may have some errors. The VLTOR A5 uses an intermediate buffer - weight and length adjusted to allow use of a rifle length spring in a shorter tube. That compresses the spring a bit, and the resulting preload allows use in a shorter tube, being effectively a spring of weight somewhere between an uncompressed carbine & uncompressed rifle action spring with the bolt closed. It is, to my rough understanding, the buffer/action spring/receiver extension cousin to a midlength gas system. Neither rifle nor carbine.

The carbine spring is shorter but heavier at rest, along with a generally lighter buffer (until you get into the H3 range). The rifle length has a softer spring but heavier and longer buffer. The net effect is same cycle length with different characteristics to the recoil impulse. The subtleties of ROF come about from the interaction between spring rate, buffer weight, and gas system (port size, dwell time, powder, etc.). Beyond that, I would need to research spring compression & buffer weight to understand it better. Dwell time within & between systems changes, but not AFAIK the actual BCG travel distance.

Without knowing the UZI system, I would hypothesize that the buffer speeds ROF not by making the bolt cycle shorter, but by compressing the spring a bit & effectively making it a higher rate spring. But again, that's just from my understanding of spring physics, not the workings of the UZI.

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile
Like fine herbs, dreams only develop their full fragrance when crushed and ground into a fine powder.
-LowBeta
Armory » M-16