M16 or AR, what the hell is the difference , if they are both used in a full auto application? I use three Bushmaster 14.5" HBAR fluted barrels for my Valkyrie Armaments Belt fed conversion in a MGI quick change upper with my DIAS. Why, because it is my understanding that the mass of a heavy barrel pulls the heat from the bore. The fluting increases surface area (the interface with the air) by 180% compared to the surface area of a standard HBAR barrel.
It is also my understanding that a light weight profile barrel and sustained full auto fire works against each other. The warmer most metals gets, the softer that metal tends to get. So as the temperature of the barrel gets higher, the more each round passing through the bore tends to wear the bore. With the lower mass of a light weight barrel, the temperature of that barrel tends to rise more per round of use than a heavy profile barrel. There is also the issue of the coefficient of heat expansion between the steel barrel and the chrome lining of the barrel. As the barrel temperature rises, the difference in the difference of heat expansion could cause the fracture of the chrome lining. I would think that would be a very bad thing.
This is a personal choice. I'm not concerned about function over appearance. I don't care if the AR based machinegun looks like a classic military machinegun. I think the function of the rotation of the three chrome lined HBAR fluted barrels in a beltfed SAW type application works better in my collector application. The cost of the heavy fluted barrels as very close to the cost of a standard light weight or HBAR barrel. So I choose to use fluted HBAR barrels. YMMV.
Scott