I don't care about a couple ounces between makes, but the 7.62 cans can be around 10oz heavier with some models (YHM) vs. cans from surefire or AAC. half a pound more hanging off the end of the barrel is a big deal in my opinion, as is 2+ inches. I don't care nearly as much about the sound reduction as most seem to do about the same as far as what you can actually detect with your ear when you are out using them. I said "about the same", not trying to start a brand war. Just speaking from a pragmatic perspective.

I was planing to get the new AAC 7.62 that came out for the .300 BLK. However, recently I've gotten frustrated with the AAC mounting system. I don't think I'll contine investing it in. It seems weak and prone to wear. My new m4 200 in 6.8 has barely been used and already the can backs off a half click which makes the latch extremely hard to push for some reason. Now they have 90T mount which means 51T mount options will eventually follow the fate of the 18T mounts. I also have decided I don't care for the mounts like AAC and YHM with a wide "ratchet ring" at the base of the mount. Visually, it looks bad and also seems like the teeth are vulnurable to damage.

I have high hopes for the new SilencerCo Saker which should be out in a 7.62 version at some point, hopefully "soon". If not, I may bite the bullet for a surefire.

If you are wanting a 30 cal can to use on both 30 and an AR in 223 I would recommend an SAS 30 cal QD can. I have it and a SF FA556212 and if I had the SAS in my posession before the SF I would NOT have gotten the SF. Granted its a short 223 can vs a 300 win mag rated can .. but the 30 cal SAS suppresses 223 just fine and is a fraction of the cost of a SF. I think the SAS QD is around 600 with additional mounts at 75.

Randy Pennington @ Mile High Shooting Supply is the guy to go to for ordering one. Dealing directly with SAS is not ideal as the owner works way too many hours at a "real job" and then spends his off time making quality suppressors. Hence getting a hold of SAS directly is hard at times.

Just my $.02

ETA: I would also have your FFL/SOT dealer get ahold of Mack Brothers Suppressors. They are relatively unknown but have been in the mfg business for a long time ( they machine all of Badger Ordinance gear ) . They are producing some VERY NICE cans. If memory serves me correctly their 30 QD is around 800 ish.

Still holding out for KAC's QDC lineup.

I am too...but in the mean time I ordered a 762SDN6 for my EMC. Stamp was approved last week. I'd still be waiting if I were to hold off so it is what it is for now. KAC makes great kit but the wait times can become unbearable. I'm still waiting on them to release the URX III Mid Length rail...


I'd recommend the SDN6 if you don't want to wait. If you won't be ready to purchase for a few more months get the SR-7 as the mount is a little better, but I have a hard time seeing the value in Surefires suppressors. You're paying a decent amount more for a nice mounting system and slightly poorer sound performance in most cases. I'm no fanboy as I've used a few different brands of cans but I felt the AAC was a better value buy. It's full inconel, the mount is still good, and it's durable as heck. They are quiet too so that doesn't hurt as it's the main purpose of the suppressor.

CMS

Thanks for all the replies guys. I do appreciate everyone's input and comments.

What sort of maintenance is required for suppressors?

Disassemble and wipe clean after every range session?
Disassemble and soak in solvents?
Disassemble and CLP on a brush to clean?

Again, sorry for the questions, just trying to learn here.

Regarding zero shift––-

Concentric threading on a barrel is more important for minimizing zero shift. Ops, Inc. checks their mounts for concentricity, although each MFG for a suppressor should specify how close threads need to be for their suppressors. It is entirely possible to have the suppressor mount to the same place each time with SF, AAC, and YHM since the mounts have ratcheting teeth. Protecting these threads and teeth is the responsibility of a $10 thread protector.

Ill soak my suppressors when black junk starts falling out but I won't mess with them until then. There's no need to wear it out cleaning it.

I paid for my FA556-212 today so it better be good.

I know the AAC has tougher inconel and is cheaper and is maybe even quieter, but I just like the Surefire.

It has alot to do with the outside dimensions. Because the locking ring is external on the surefire and internal on the AAC, it make the Surefire appear much shorter, even though there is only a 1/4" difference.

I paid the extra $200 to get the can I liked better, and Ill have it forever, or at least the majority of my life

SureFire cans don't have POI shift?

our snipers had cards for the guns, one suppressed and one with out the can. SureFire cans have a POI shift it's just minimal and repeatable from what i've herd, isn't it?

I don't own a SF suppressor but I don't believe the "no POI shift" claim. I'd believe minimal POI shift but hell, that applies to a lot of cans.

On the 2 guns I mount this can on it's within an inch @ 100 YRDS. The other AR is scoped (Larue upper) so the poi change is detectable. One thing I didn't mention, if you shoot different ammo the POI will change, so naturally if your shooting for real, you need to keep track what ammo hits where....

Surefire makes good stuff, but it will cost a few extra bucks over the other brands. I run 2 AAC silencers and a YHM Phantom 556 can also. The phantom can is a great value and it's built like a tank. AAC makes good stuff too, but I run pistol silencers with them.

I am running an FA556-212 (SF)...chose after working with AAC and toying with YHM. All have decent db reduction. I really am unable to tell a difference, but YMMV. The SF mounts are absolutely the best in my opinion. The claim of minimal POI shift and on/off repeatability have all proven true on my carbines. You should still be able to find a SF can for less than $1200 if you look around. I found one in my own back yard here in Florida after searching North America for three weeks. If you have the $$ you will not be disappointed.

so i'm guessing that you don't actually live in Cali or....... you are LE maybe?