Site Notices
10/1/2014 2:19:24 PM
10/1/2014 10:30:17 AM
Author
Message
gbcop
Offline
Posts: 20
Feedback: 100% (32)
Posted: 4/7/2012 10:01:55 AM
A local dealer has a Ranger 2 in stock for $509 Plus tax.

I've decided on a .223 can and I'm just curious if difference between Ranger 2 and 3 is significant to hold off till I find a Ranger 3?

Friendly_Crusader
Nonsense personified
Offline
Posts: 6425
Feedback: 100% (85)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/7/2012 10:43:11 AM
Ranger 3 has m4 2000 baffles so I'd wait personally
Politicians are the same all over. They promise to build a bridge even where there is no river.
-Nikita Khrushchev

Posts dictated but not read.
gbcop
Offline
Posts: 22
Feedback: 100% (32)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/7/2012 2:06:46 PM
[Last Edit: 4/7/2012 2:08:21 PM by gbcop]
Please enlighten the new to NFA, lol. What's the difference?? The decibel reduction from what I've seen is the same. #1 is the can makes factory 5.56 hearing safe(Under 140 decibels)

THANK YOU FOR YOUR INPUT!!! It is greatly appreciated! Just trying to find out what makes improved baffles better.

Thanks again!!!
Green0
Military
Offline
Posts: 9469
Feedback: 100% (74)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/7/2012 2:48:06 PM
[Last Edit: 4/7/2012 2:51:20 PM by Green0]
Rumored to have M4-2000 baffles which isn't substantiated in company website information. Same 6" length, same 28-30DB sound reduction, lighter weight consistent with the lightened rear cap geometry for pin and weld installation compatibility.

Due to the $550 cost of the product, and the high cost of inconel baffles, I would bet it still has 3 baffles internally. Giving the product identical baffling to the $1050 product for $550 doesn't economically compute, nor does the 28-30DB sound reduction from the 4DB higher performance rated 7 baffle stack.

Looking at that, I would say if you don't need to pin and weld, and don't care about a couple ounces of weight, don't worry about it.

I guess technically it's not a lie- because the prior Ranger 2 also had M4-2000 baffles... it just had 3 of them and not 7. While not a lie, that association seems to be miss-leading by design.
gbcop
Offline
Posts: 29
Feedback: 100% (32)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/7/2012 3:12:01 PM
Originally Posted By Green0:
Rumored to have M4-2000 baffles which isn't substantiated in company website information. Same 6" length, same 28-30DB sound reduction, lighter weight consistent with the lightened rear cap geometry for pin and weld installation compatibility.

Due to the $550 cost of the product, and the high cost of inconel baffles, I would bet it still has 3 baffles internally. Giving the product identical baffling to the $1050 product for $550 doesn't economically compute, nor does the 28-30DB sound reduction from the 4DB higher performance rated 7 baffle stack.

Looking at that, I would say if you don't need to pin and weld, and don't care about a couple ounces of weight, don't worry about it.

I guess technically it's not a lie- because the prior Ranger 2 also had M4-2000 baffles... it just had 3 of them and not 7. While not a lie, that association seems to be miss-leading by design.


THANK YOU FOR YOUR INPUT!!

Not sure what pin and weld is, but i dont think it fits my needs.
My intentions for the can is to move from one AR to another for hog hunting, maybe deer hunting.
Green0
Military
Offline
Posts: 9470
Feedback: 100% (74)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/7/2012 7:54:05 PM
Pin and weld is for people in no SBR states who want to make a 11.5" barrel into a 16.87" barrel for legal short-er suppressed 5.56mm rifles.
gbcop
Offline
Posts: 34
Feedback: 100% (32)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/7/2012 8:33:46 PM
Thanks for explaining . Thankfully don't have to worry about that in my state.
zulusierra
Offline
Posts: 579
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/7/2012 10:51:39 PM
I've had a Ranger 2 for a couple years now and would buy another one.

With F4's at 6-8 months I would buy something in-stock if I were in the market.

Then again, with NFA, the only way I buy is in-stock unless you don't mind waiting even longer than normal. That being said, it's a lifetime purchase, so get what you want.
Combat_Jack
Green Suited Salaryman
Military
Online
Posts: 63624
Feedback: 100% (15)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/7/2012 11:22:56 PM
AAC claims its quieter than the Ranger 2. You can also torque it on.
30 miles a week, upper body, dieting and reading incessantly sucks. Nobody is going to pay to do that shit. -sylvan
SC-Texas
TexasGunTrust.com
Offline
Posts: 13307
Feedback: 100% (14)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/8/2012 1:37:29 AM
[Last Edit: 4/8/2012 1:39:06 AM by SC-Texas]
The ranger 2is hell tough. I have serial #1

It is not queit when compared to the sprm4 or the m4-2k

I was told it had m42k baffles at shot show.

How many it has is not known
Sean Cody
Attorney at Law
www.TexasGunTrust.com
TexasGunTrustLawyer@TexasGunTrust.com
281.451.4175
"Providing NFA Trusts and Counseling to Texans"
Quake_Guy
Offline
Posts: 1855
Feedback: 100% (13)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/24/2012 9:05:44 PM
[Last Edit: 4/24/2012 11:57:32 PM by Quake_Guy]
was just told by dealer that the Ranger 3 is not full auto rated...
SC-Texas
TexasGunTrust.com
Offline
Posts: 13384
Feedback: 100% (14)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/24/2012 10:03:46 PM
No way
Sean Cody
Attorney at Law
www.TexasGunTrust.com
TexasGunTrustLawyer@TexasGunTrust.com
281.451.4175
"Providing NFA Trusts and Counseling to Texans"
Burnsy87
AAARRRGGHH
Offline
Posts: 8111
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/24/2012 11:46:55 PM
Side question: Why is the SPR/M4 no longer on their website?
Join the Nebraska Firearms Owners Association. http://www.nebraskafirearms.org

Archer: Cry "Havok!" And let slip the hogs of war!
Lana: DOGS of war.......
Archer: WHATEVER FARM ANIMAL OF WAR, LANA!
GeneralPurpose
Needs more stamps
Online
Posts: 629
Feedback: 100% (9)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/25/2012 12:14:05 AM
Originally Posted By Burnsy87:
Side question: Why is the SPR/M4 no longer on their website?


It's discontinued, along with the M4-1000, the 6.8 SPC silencers, the 762-SD, the Cyclone-K, and the ECO-9.
That's like keeping an empty beer can in the fridge, I keep mine loaded 24/7 - TheMercenary
Burnsy87
AAARRRGGHH
Offline
Posts: 8112
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/25/2012 2:12:56 PM
Originally Posted By GeneralPurpose:
Originally Posted By Burnsy87:
Side question: Why is the SPR/M4 no longer on their website?


It's discontinued, along with the M4-1000, the 6.8 SPC silencers, the 762-SD, the Cyclone-K, and the ECO-9.


I was interested in the small amount of length added to my SBR, that's why I grabbed the MITER mount for the SPR/M4.

Crap.
Join the Nebraska Firearms Owners Association. http://www.nebraskafirearms.org

Archer: Cry "Havok!" And let slip the hogs of war!
Lana: DOGS of war.......
Archer: WHATEVER FARM ANIMAL OF WAR, LANA!
Dog1
U.S. Rifle, Caliber .30, M1
Offline
Posts: 33090
Feedback: 100% (407)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/25/2012 4:39:01 PM
Originally Posted By GeneralPurpose:
Originally Posted By Burnsy87:
Side question: Why is the SPR/M4 no longer on their website?


It's discontinued, along with the M4-1000, the 6.8 SPC silencers, the 762-SD, the Cyclone-K, and the ECO-9.


Funny how that happened after they were bought out.
Hansan: "This is a .30 caliber, gas operated, clip fed, semi-automatic rifle....."
Soldier: "Look, you ain't sellin it to me, you're only showing me how it works."

GeneralPurpose
Needs more stamps
Online
Posts: 630
Feedback: 100% (9)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/25/2012 8:38:03 PM
Originally Posted By Burnsy87:
Originally Posted By GeneralPurpose:
Originally Posted By Burnsy87:
Side question: Why is the SPR/M4 no longer on their website?


It's discontinued, along with the M4-1000, the 6.8 SPC silencers, the 762-SD, the Cyclone-K, and the ECO-9.


I was interested in the small amount of length added to my SBR, that's why I grabbed the MITER mount for the SPR/M4.

Crap.


Look around, you might still be able to find an SPR-M4. Or just go with one of the newer cans.

Originally Posted By Dog1:
Originally Posted By GeneralPurpose:
Originally Posted By Burnsy87:
Side question: Why is the SPR/M4 no longer on their website?


It's discontinued, along with the M4-1000, the 6.8 SPC silencers, the 762-SD, the Cyclone-K, and the ECO-9.


Funny how that happened after they were bought out.


Eh, they got bought out a while ago. More specifically, they discontinued those silencers after releasing the 2012 batch of silencers. AAC has a lot of silencers to carry right now, and would have been making a ridiculous amount of cans if they hadn't killed those cans. It's all in the name of progress, or at least what they view as progress. They're definitely trending towards smaller cans, as seen by the introduction of the Mini-4 and Mini-7, as well as the replacement of the Cyclone-K with the Hunter and the 762-SD with the 762-SDN-6. AAC's sales of the SPR-M4 were definitely lower than the M4-2000 and others. The sales of the 6.8 SPC cans were undoubtedly very low, since most people just buy a .308 can to cover that need. I forgot to add into the other post, the Ranger 2 was also replaced by the Ranger 3. And the EVO-40 and 45 were both killed, while the 9 remains onboard. For now.

A lot of people, including myself, prefer end-mount cans for flexibility. The SPR-M4 was a very cool can, but one I never would have bought. I think AAC axed their old models and their low-volume models to make room for the new stuff. It wouldn't make any business sense to make 50 different cans. I don't think Remington/Freedom Group/whatever had anything to do with it.
That's like keeping an empty beer can in the fridge, I keep mine loaded 24/7 - TheMercenary