I recently purchased a new production M1 carbine from one of the better known shops. This rifle has a new receiver and barrel combined with USGI parts, and is advertised as being mil-spec.

I won't name the manufacturer, as I have contacted them and am in the process of seeking resolution.

The rifle, overall appears to be very well made, but when I field stripped it for cleaning prior to firing it, I noticed that the action/barrel did not seem to fit the stock well, With the barrel band and hand guard removed, the barrel was noticeably offset to on side. Also, the gap around the magazine well/trigger housing on the stock was uneven, again suggesting that the action was not fitting into the stock very well. It actually takes a fair amount of force to line things up and install the handguard/barrel band.

Now, I realize this isn't a precision rifle, but it was quite expensive, and for what I paid, I would expect something without what, to me, appear to be fitment issues.

If you wouldn't mind, take a look at the pictures and give me your opinion as to whether this would be acceptable to you, or if I am making a mountain out of a mole-hill.  Thanks,

For what you probably paid, I'd also not be happy with that fit.

I have GI carbines that look like that. If it really bothers you, try playing with the retaining plate/screw and seeing if loosening it slips it into a better position.

The receiver to stock fit on real USGI carbines is no better, often worse.  This is a short range weapon so better stock inletting or bedding has little practical benefit.

When the hand guard and barrel band are installed, does it pull the stock closer to straight?

I am by no means a M1 Carbine expert (FAR from it) but I have owned two USGI examples over the years. I would say that on both, the wood to metal / action to stock fit was less than appealing but they both shot fine. I had always assumed is was because the guns had been overhauled at least a couple times as well as age, exposure to harsh conditions, etc.

This.  The fit on the one you have is pretty much normal.  Some are better, others are worse.  There is a lot of variation in carbine parts.

thanks for everyone's input. This is my first carbine, so I don't have anything to compare to.