Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Posted: 4/24/2016 1:51:26 PM EDT
Calico is making the 100 round 9mm again, I think.
Anyone have experience with this?  Not the one of old but the new production.
Link Posted: 4/24/2016 2:37:43 PM EDT
[#1]
Tag for interest.  I was not aware they were back in production
Link Posted: 4/24/2016 7:29:55 PM EDT
[#2]
Link Posted: 4/24/2016 8:20:11 PM EDT
[#3]
Good news, looks like they will have a .40 sw version in 2010.

All joking aside, I have 4 of the older models (all purchased at least 13 years ago), and they have all been great.
Link Posted: 4/25/2016 2:55:14 PM EDT
[#4]
I have never in my life felt an urge to buy a calico... but that Liberty III tactical is kinda calling to me, lol.
Link Posted: 4/25/2016 3:10:44 PM EDT
[#5]
No experience with the new, but had a 9mm model back in the day.  I never could get it to cycle properly and traded it for something else at a gun show.
Link Posted: 4/27/2016 11:54:50 AM EDT
[#6]
Next thing you know, they will bring back the Wilkinson "Linda".
Link Posted: 4/28/2016 3:37:52 AM EDT
[#7]
http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2014/06/09/odd-guns-calico-m-900-9mm/

I have never heard anyone aside fromGreyKnight say anything positive about a Calico
Link Posted: 4/28/2016 7:42:04 AM EDT
[#8]
That was one of the first guns I wanted as a kid, hindsight I'm glad I was a kid and couldn't buy it .
Link Posted: 4/28/2016 8:06:59 AM EDT
[#9]
Link Posted: 4/28/2016 11:30:41 AM EDT
[#10]
Link Posted: 5/1/2016 2:09:57 PM EDT
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Next thing you know, they will bring back the Wilkinson "Linda".
View Quote



I believe the owner died. they were made in my hometown, had one...seemed decent.
Link Posted: 5/1/2016 2:33:54 PM EDT
[#12]
I had one of the .22s way back when. Took it from the gunshop to the range and right back to the gunshop. I couldn't get more than a few rounds through it before a malfunction. I wouldn't ever consider another .22 but I would give a 9mm a shot.
Link Posted: 5/6/2016 1:31:31 PM EDT
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I had one of the .22s way back when. Took it from the gunshop to the range and right back to the gunshop. I couldn't get more than a few rounds through it before a malfunction. I wouldn't ever consider another .22 but I would give a 9mm a shot.
View Quote


Yup, the .22s, especially the older version, needed some attention to run well. On mine, lube it well, run copper jacketed ammo, and most importantly, be careful loading the mag, just a little misalignment led to a jam. Following these steps, I end up with a jam every 400-500 rounds.

All of my 9mm's have been about 100% with nothing but standard lubrication. They run fmj, hp, even some cast lead a couple times. I really think most of the hate came from people hearing someone talk about the .22 and just assuming they were all like that.
Link Posted: 5/6/2016 1:38:55 PM EDT
[#14]
One of my .22 mags is bad, but I had no idea replacement parts were available.  I guess while I'm ordering parts I might as well get the smoke shells for the mags.
Link Posted: 5/6/2016 4:18:12 PM EDT
[#15]


I had one back in the early 90's.  It ran well.  Fun to shoot.  Accurate.  It did have some FTF, but it had more to do with the magazine loading.  If you didn't wind it correctly, or over wind it.  The 50 round worked better.



Overall, I would do it again if lived in the US.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top