Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page / 124
Link Posted: 8/6/2017 11:19:30 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Frost7] [#1]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By ShootingSight:
Can you provide details about how to pick up the sights via Fusion?  I looked at their website, but this was not listed.
View Quote
Sure, you can buy from them off of the Amazon Marketplace (listed as Fusion Firearms) as well as eBay (they are seller whitetail1911). They don't come as a set so you need to buy the front and rear sights separately.

Rear sight is the LPA MAS7, front sight is the LPA T-MAS7.
Link Posted: 8/7/2017 12:26:03 AM EDT
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Frost7:
So, ARX-160 (A3 military, not the .22LR) accessories: two thumbs up for the LPA sights, one thumb up and one thumb sideways for the bipod.

LPA MAS7/T-MAS7s took some hunting to find since they are apparently not marketed in the US, but Fusion Firearms was able to hook me up. Same for the ARX-160 bipod. Not available here, but Brignoli Silvio over in Italy hooked me up. Ordered the bipod July 5th, got it around the 25th.

Biggest takeaway on both is they stay true to the ARX's focus on being lightweight and able to be operated in all facets using hands alone, or at most a bullet tip.

http://i.imgur.com/DcCnuLr.jpg

First, the sights. Both are locking flip-up designs, metal, and extremely durable and well-made, easily on par with Troys and LPA's other offerings. These are definitely not the shitty polymer factory sights. They are very, very nice. Their curves also go really with with the ARX cosmetically, IMO.

The front sights lock both down and up. To move them, you depress a small round button on the left and either raise or lower them. Adjustments do not need tools, as they have a handy little built-in wheel for adjusting elevation. No going out to rezero and realizing you forgot the stupid front sight tool on these.

They have both a black blade insert and a red fiber optic insert. I'm not sure if they were supposed to only come with the fiber optic as LPA's website makes it sound like the front sight comes with both, but the one I got from Fusion only had the fiber optic. No matter as I'd probably only use the fiber optic anyway. It's plenty visible when not illuminated, and is a nice unmistakable brilliant red out in daylight.

http://i.imgur.com/pzFa1Lo.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/mheAqQp.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/WWWT9Ce.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/tBR7xXF.jpg

The rear sights also lock in place and are deployed by pulling up on a little spring-loaded shell-shaped section on the front of the sight and then rotating them up or down. They have a stop at 45 degrees where they'll click and not be able to be rotated back down unless you pull on the shell, but can be continued to be pushed forward. Not sure what the use for that is, but it's there nonetheless. The shell is more difficult to operate than the simple button on the front sights, but really not overly so at all; it doesn't require an inordinate amount of upward force.

Windage is adjusted by rotating either of the knobs on either side of the sight (they're linked). The thing I like most about these is the novel aperture system. You've got a wheel that can be quickly rotated with a finger or two to your desire aperture without obstructing your sight picture. There is a U cutout for close quarters, which with the red fiber optic front sight is actually surprisingly usable for both-eyes-open irons usage in daylight, making a pretty great ghetto red dot sight. Then a large circle for closer shooting, medium-sized circle for mid-range, and a tiny circle for long-range.

http://i.imgur.com/y93QD18.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/dfpiEM4.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/9nzpn4N.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/vdefN94.jpg

(The sight base isn't rusted, for some reason the color came out weird rusty brownish on my camera. It looks like a very dark brownish black finish to the eye)

Looking through the U aperture:

http://i.imgur.com/QakuxnM.jpg

Only downsides are they don't sit quite as low as low profile sights, but it's really not an issue. My Steiner MRS sits VERY low and yet the irons when folded do not obstruct my view appreciably. You can just see the front sight sitting just below the holographic dot, and if you're shooting both eyes open, it's a total non-issue. Anything higher than RMR height shouldn't even have that.

http://i.imgur.com/KLw82fJ.jpg

The other downside is they are not low sights as I thought they were. I'm not sure if they're the same height as standard AR sights, but I believe they are as they're a bit taller when deployed than my Troy mediums that I had on hand. Honestly it actually works out really well with my MRS though. When folded, they are not in the way. When deployed, they are just above the top of the MRS. Perfectly usable.

At this point, I really like them and will be leaving them on my ARX as its main sights.

Then we have the bipod.

http://i.imgur.com/og7lHAF.jpg

I can't help it, but this bipod feels extremely cheap. Feels being the operative word though; it's a perfectly good bipod for the size and while it feels like you're going to snap it in half by breathing on it, in practice it is quite durable. I've already banged it up a good bit and used it for rapidly assuming a position and shooting and it stands up to the beating like a champ. It's made for Beretta by Brügger & Thomet of MP9 fame. It is emphatically not a precision-shooting bipod though; it's made for rapid use in combat and it shows. It's pretty clear being able to be deployed, stowed, and adjusted quickly and effortlessly without so much as a button press was the design aim for this bipod and it does that well.

Want to deploy it? Grab the legs in your hand and yank them backward you (made much easier by squeezing them together while doing so, but not necessary). Want to stow it? Grab the legs and shove them forward (again, made much easier by squeezing them together while doing so, but not necessary). Want to extend a leg? Grab it and pull it out to the desired length. The only time you press a button is to retract the legs.

http://i.imgur.com/LxiJsQS.jpg

It's not very stable on hard, slick surfaces, but does beautifully on rough surfaces, in dirt, on sand, or wherever else. It does not swivel, but it does pan. The bipod attaches via a QD mount and comes out of the box sized for the ARX-100 and -160's slightly wide polymer picatinny mini-rail. It locks on tightly, and uses the little ball with the B&T on it to extend the center of rotation a little further forward so that it's about under the gas block rather than under the rail. It can be tightened kind of like an ADM QD mount by rotating a little nut on the side. As it fits the polymer 6 o-clock rail perfectly and that rail is a bit on the wide side, you'll need to tighten it up a bit for the longer 6 o'clock rail if you use that instead.

Last thing about the bipod I really like? It is VERY light! My KAC precision bipod weighs in just under 14 oz. The B&T ARX-160 bipod? Just over 8 oz. You can feel the weight of it a bit, but it really feels like it's not even there compared to my KAC bipod or a Harris. Would I use it to go prone and snipe with? I wouldn't really prefer it, but that's not the purpose it's made for; it's made to be a very light attachment that is ultra-quick and totally no fuss to deploy and stow if you want some quick, situational stabilization.

It's also a great tool to keep the ARX upright for display.

http://i.imgur.com/TBUiUqN.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/MdRqobv.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/5xfBQOd.jpg
View Quote
Top notch review.  I like those sights even more now.  How's the stock cheek weld with the sight height?
Link Posted: 8/7/2017 4:02:56 AM EDT
[#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Frost7:
So, ARX-160 (A3 military, not the .22LR) accessories: two thumbs up for the LPA sights, one thumb up and one thumb sideways for the bipod.

LPA MAS7/T-MAS7s took some hunting to find since they are apparently not marketed in the US, but Fusion Firearms was able to hook me up. Same for the ARX-160 bipod. Not available here, but Brignoli Silvio over in Italy hooked me up. Ordered the bipod July 5th, got it around the 25th.

Biggest takeaway on both is they stay true to the ARX's focus on being lightweight and able to be operated in all facets using hands alone, or at most a bullet tip.

http://i.imgur.com/DcCnuLr.jpg

First, the sights. Both are locking flip-up designs, metal, and extremely durable and well-made, easily on par with Troys and LPA's other offerings. These are definitely not the shitty polymer factory sights. They are very, very nice. Their curves also go really with with the ARX cosmetically, IMO.

The front sights lock both down and up. To move them, you depress a small round button on the left and either raise or lower them. Adjustments do not need tools, as they have a handy little built-in wheel for adjusting elevation. No going out to rezero and realizing you forgot the stupid front sight tool on these.

They have both a black blade insert and a red fiber optic insert. I'm not sure if they were supposed to only come with the fiber optic as LPA's website makes it sound like the front sight comes with both, but the one I got from Fusion only had the fiber optic. No matter as I'd probably only use the fiber optic anyway. It's plenty visible when not illuminated, and is a nice unmistakable brilliant red out in daylight.

http://i.imgur.com/pzFa1Lo.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/mheAqQp.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/WWWT9Ce.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/tBR7xXF.jpg

The rear sights also lock in place and are deployed by pulling up on a little spring-loaded shell-shaped section on the front of the sight and then rotating them up or down. They have a stop at 45 degrees where they'll click and not be able to be rotated back down unless you pull on the shell, but can be continued to be pushed forward. Not sure what the use for that is, but it's there nonetheless. The shell is more difficult to operate than the simple button on the front sights, but really not overly so at all; it doesn't require an inordinate amount of upward force.

Windage is adjusted by rotating either of the knobs on either side of the sight (they're linked). The thing I like most about these is the novel aperture system. You've got a wheel that can be quickly rotated with a finger or two to your desire aperture without obstructing your sight picture. There is a U cutout for close quarters, which with the red fiber optic front sight is actually surprisingly usable for both-eyes-open irons usage in daylight, making a pretty great ghetto red dot sight. Then a large circle for closer shooting, medium-sized circle for mid-range, and a tiny circle for long-range.

http://i.imgur.com/y93QD18.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/dfpiEM4.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/9nzpn4N.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/vdefN94.jpg

(The sight base isn't rusted, for some reason the color came out weird rusty brownish on my camera. It looks like a very dark brownish black finish to the eye)

Looking through the U aperture:

http://i.imgur.com/QakuxnM.jpg

Only downsides are they don't sit quite as low as low profile sights, but it's really not an issue. My Steiner MRS sits VERY low and yet the irons when folded do not obstruct my view appreciably. You can just see the front sight sitting just below the holographic dot, and if you're shooting both eyes open, it's a total non-issue. Anything higher than RMR height shouldn't even have that.

http://i.imgur.com/KLw82fJ.jpg

The other downside is they are not low sights as I thought they were. I'm not sure if they're the same height as standard AR sights, but I believe they are as they're a bit taller when deployed than my Troy mediums that I had on hand. Honestly it actually works out really well with my MRS though. When folded, they are not in the way. When deployed, they are just above the top of the MRS. Perfectly usable.

At this point, I really like them and will be leaving them on my ARX as its main sights.

Then we have the bipod.

http://i.imgur.com/og7lHAF.jpg

I can't help it, but this bipod feels extremely cheap. Feels being the operative word though; it's a perfectly good bipod for the price and while it feels like you're going to snap it in half by breathing on it, in practice it is quite durable. I've already banged it up a good bit and used it for rapidly assuming a position and shooting and it stands up to the beating like a champ. It's made for Beretta by Brügger & Thomet of MP9 fame. It is emphatically not a precision-shooting bipod though; it's made for rapid use in combat and it shows. It's pretty clear being able to be deployed, stowed, and adjusted quickly and effortlessly without so much as a button press was the design aim for this bipod and it does that well.

Want to deploy it? Grab the legs in your hand and yank them back toward you (made much easier by squeezing them together while doing so, but not necessary). Want to stow it? Grab the legs and shove them forward (again, made much easier by squeezing them together while doing so, but not necessary). Want to extend a leg? Grab it and pull it out to the desired length. The only time you press a button is to retract the legs.

http://i.imgur.com/LxiJsQS.jpg

It's not very stable on hard, slick surfaces, but does beautifully on rough surfaces, in dirt, on sand, or wherever else. It does not swivel, but it does pan. The bipod attaches via a QD mount and comes out of the box sized for the ARX-100 and -160's slightly wide polymer picatinny mini-rail. It locks on tightly, and uses the little ball with the B&T on it to extend the center of rotation a little further forward so that it's about under the gas block rather than under the rail. It can be tightened kind of like an ADM QD mount by rotating a little nut on the side. As it fits the polymer 6 o-clock rail perfectly and that rail is a bit on the wide side, you'll need to tighten it up a bit for the longer 6 o'clock rail if you use that instead.

Last thing about the bipod I really like? It is VERY light! My KAC precision bipod weighs in just under 14 oz. The B&T ARX-160 bipod? Just over 8 oz. You can feel the weight of it a bit, but it really feels like it's not even there compared to my KAC bipod or a Harris. Would I use it to go prone and snipe with? I wouldn't really prefer it, but that's not the purpose it's made for; it's made to be a very light attachment that is ultra-quick and totally no fuss to deploy and stow if you want some quick, situational stabilization.

It's also a great tool to keep the ARX upright for display.

http://i.imgur.com/TBUiUqN.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/MdRqobv.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/5xfBQOd.jpg


EDIT: Typos.
View Quote
How are you liking the little Steiner dot so far?
I'm still undecided on what to get for my ARX.
Oh, have any of you detected a slight side to side movement in the rear of the rail even on the newer rifles with the pin?
I can see just a hair of movement by watching where the metal rail slides over the polymer.
Probably not a big deal, but I'm going to try and get a sight that can be mounted in the area that the two screws on the rail are for a solid fit.
Link Posted: 8/7/2017 9:41:39 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 556Cliff] [#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By nsl:
Oh, have any of you detected a slight side to side movement in the rear of the rail even on the newer rifles with the pin?
I can see just a hair of movement by watching where the metal rail slides over the polymer.
Probably not a big deal, but I'm going to try and get a sight that can be mounted in the area that the two screws on the rail are for a solid fit.
View Quote
The slight play in the rail should not be a problem.

I decided to remove the pin on mine and I haven't had any issues. The military ARX-160A3 does not come with the pin because it isn't part of the design and it isn't needed.
Link Posted: 8/7/2017 1:17:18 PM EDT
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By 556Cliff:


The slight play in the rail should not be a problem.

I decided to remove the pin on mine and I haven't had any issues. The military ARX-160A3 does not come with the pin because it isn't part of the design and it isn't needed.
View Quote
Why would you remove it?
Link Posted: 8/7/2017 1:58:59 PM EDT
[#6]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By SmartDrug:


Why would you remove it?
View Quote
My ARX is from the first run that didn't include the roll pin, so I contacted Beretta and they sent me a roll pin and a free mag. I installed the roll pin but found no real benefit to having it installed so I later removed it.

I would probably also remove the roll pin if I end up buying another newer ARX that includes the roll pin just to be more authentic to the original design of the A3 rail configuration.
Link Posted: 8/7/2017 4:36:43 PM EDT
[#7]
But wasn't it a matter of they just forgot to install a standard part?

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By 556Cliff:


My ARX is from the first run that didn't include the roll pin, so I contacted Beretta and they sent me a roll pin and a free mag. I installed the roll pin but found no real benefit to having it installed so I later removed it.

I would probably also remove the roll pin if I end up buying another newer ARX that includes the roll pin just to be more authentic to the original design of the A3 rail configuration.
View Quote
Link Posted: 8/7/2017 5:01:32 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 556Cliff] [#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By KnightofTheOldeCode:
But wasn't it a matter of they just forgot to install a standard part?
View Quote
No, it was a bandaid "fix" because Larry Vickers saw the "loose rail" and perceived it as a problem and then posted about it on one of the forums. Beretta USA then added the pin because they didn't want any negative publicity on a rifle that they had just released.

Beretta came up with a story that the addition of the roll pin was lost in translation from Italian to English, but if true, then why is there still no roll pin on the Italian ARX-160A3 of which the ARX-100 is based???
Link Posted: 8/7/2017 6:26:34 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Master_Blaster] [#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By 556Cliff:
No, it was a bandaid "fix" because Larry Vickers saw the "loose rail" and perceived it as a problem and then posted about it on one of the forums. Beretta USA then added the pin because they didn't want any negative publicity on a rifle that they had just released.

Beretta came up with a story that the addition of the roll pin was lost in translation from Italian to English, but if true, then why is there still no roll pin on the Italian ARX-160A3 of which the ARX-100 is based???
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By 556Cliff:
Originally Posted By KnightofTheOldeCode:
But wasn't it a matter of they just forgot to install a standard part?
No, it was a bandaid "fix" because Larry Vickers saw the "loose rail" and perceived it as a problem and then posted about it on one of the forums. Beretta USA then added the pin because they didn't want any negative publicity on a rifle that they had just released.

Beretta came up with a story that the addition of the roll pin was lost in translation from Italian to English, but if true, then why is there still no roll pin on the Italian ARX-160A3 of which the ARX-100 is based???
Why don't we get the larger A3 upper HG vents?  Perhaps it was addressed in an update to the  master mold that didn't follow the -100.  That much flex in an upper rail is kind of unusual, & not something I would expect in an precision optics mounting platform.  My pin stays in.
Link Posted: 8/7/2017 7:15:34 PM EDT
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Master_Blaster:


Why don't we get the larger A3 upper HG vents?  Perhaps it was addressed in a update to the  master mold that didn't follow the -100.  That much flex in an upper rail is kind of unusual, & not something I would expect in an precision optics mounting platform.  My pin stays in.
View Quote
I don't know why we didn't get the larger vent holes, I really wish that they would make their way to the ARX-100 though.

It's your choice on the roll pin, it certainly doesn't hurt anything by being there.
Link Posted: 8/7/2017 10:57:07 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Frost7] [#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Master_Blaster:
Top notch review.  I like those sights even more now.  How's the stock cheek weld with the sight height?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Master_Blaster:
Top notch review.  I like those sights even more now.  How's the stock cheek weld with the sight height?
They're a little high but not so high you can't work around it acceptably and accurately by going for more of a mid-jaw-weld.

Originally Posted By nsl:
How are you liking the little Steiner dot so far?
I'm still undecided on what to get for my ARX.
Oh, have any of you detected a slight side to side movement in the rear of the rail even on the newer rifles with the pin?
I love the shit out of it. It's basically an RMR, just only a few grams heavier and changing the battery isn't a pain in the ass. Plus it's enclosed so you don't have random dust specks appearing in the reticle every now and then and necessitating a brush off with a lens pen like an RMR. It also has maybe 25% of the tint and distortion that an RMR has. Plus it has real auto-adjusting brightness with a forward-facing light sensor, not "auto-adjust" by way of light from the sides and top being collected on a fiber-optic. So if you do something like aim out into the blazing sun from a dark room, it will quickly kick the brightness up to full rather than washing out like dual-illuminated RMRs will.

Mainly I love it because it's holographic (laser) instead of LED. As I've mentioned elsewhere and I think in this thread, I have an issue with a very slight astigmatism in my right eye even though I have 20/15 vision. Causes things like Aimpoints to smudge out a bit and RMRs have little floating dimmer versions of the reticle nearby (why I only use the green triangle one and only on my M4 Super90 now). Holographic sights I have no issue with though and they resolve perfectly, so I prefer EOTechs as the center dots on those are nice and sharp. MRS is also a crisp dot to my eyes so it's perfectly to me.

As far as the rail, no issues here. If it moves, it hasn't caused my zero to shift, so... non-issue.
Link Posted: 8/8/2017 6:48:09 AM EDT
[#12]
Thanks!
Link Posted: 8/8/2017 8:39:59 AM EDT
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Frost7:

They're a little high but not so high you can't work around it acceptably and accurately by going for more of a mid-jaw-weld.



I love the shit out of it. It's basically an RMR, just only a few grams heavier and changing the battery isn't a pain in the ass. Plus it's enclosed so you don't have random dust specks appearing in the reticle every now and then and necessitating a brush off with a lens pen like an RMR. It also has maybe 25% of the tint and distortion that an RMR has. Plus it has real auto-adjusting brightness with a forward-facing light sensor, not "auto-adjust" by way of light from the sides and top being collected on a fiber-optic. So if you do something like aim out into the blazing sun from a dark room, it will quickly kick the brightness up to full rather than washing out like dual-illuminated RMRs will.

Mainly I love it because it's holographic (laser) instead of LED. As I've mentioned elsewhere and I think in this thread, I have an issue with a very slight astigmatism in my right eye even though I have 20/15 vision. Causes things like Aimpoints to smudge out a bit and RMRs have little floating dimmer versions of the reticle nearby (why I only use the green triangle one and only on my M4 Super90 now). Holographic sights I have no issue with though and they resolve perfectly, so I prefer EOTechs as the center dots on those are nice and sharp. MRS is also a crisp dot to my eyes so it's perfectly to me.

As far as the rail, no issues here. If it moves, it hasn't caused my zero to shift, so... non-issue.
View Quote
How high is it from the top of the rail to the center of the lense on the Steiner?
Have you tried any other optics on the gun?
I'm playing with the idea of getting an Aimpoint Micro, AD CASV mount, and may Troy Micro sights.
Not sure how it is going to play out, so maybe it won't be an expensive mistake.
Link Posted: 8/9/2017 2:15:21 AM EDT
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Frost7:


Sure, you can buy from them off of the Amazon Marketplace (listed as Fusion Firearms) as well as eBay (they are seller whitetail1911). They don't come as a set so you need to buy the front and rear sights separately.

Rear sight is the LPA MAS7, front sight is the LPA T-MAS7.
View Quote
HI, can you take a ruler and measure from the top of the picatinny rail to the top of the front sight blade?  I'm interested in these sights but need them to clear a Dbal when deployed.  Thanks!
Link Posted: 8/13/2017 5:02:57 AM EDT
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By nsl:
How high is it from the top of the rail to the center of the lense on the Steiner?
Have you tried any other optics on the gun?
I'm playing with the idea of getting an Aimpoint Micro, AD CASV mount, and may Troy Micro sights.
Not sure how it is going to play out, so maybe it won't be an expensive mistake.
View Quote
Bump.
Frost7, could you give me the height of the Steiner?
Link Posted: 8/13/2017 10:04:23 AM EDT
[#16]
Botach's got the ARX-200 on their site. I'm not sure how long it's been there, but maybe this is a sign of things to come? Maybe? Fingers crossed...

Botach ARX-200

Link Posted: 8/13/2017 10:14:55 AM EDT
[#17]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By runner6m:

Botach's got the ARX-200 on their site. I'm not sure how long it's been there, but maybe this is a sign of things to come? Maybe? Fingers crossed...

Botach ARX-200

https://cdn2.bigcommerce.com/server4300/9j9zreeu/products/54042/images/127477/a1__34953.1500997100.1200.1200.png?c=2
View Quote
Link Posted: 8/13/2017 4:14:19 PM EDT
[#18]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By runner6m:

Botach's got the ARX-200 on their site. I'm not sure how long it's been there, but maybe this is a sign of things to come? Maybe? Fingers crossed...

Botach ARX-200

https://cdn2.bigcommerce.com/server4300/9j9zreeu/products/54042/images/127477/a1__34953.1500997100.1200.1200.png?c=2
View Quote
It was posted on the previous page.
Link Posted: 8/13/2017 4:19:11 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Frost7] [#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By nsl:
How high is it from the top of the rail to the center of the lense on the Steiner?
Have you tried any other optics on the gun?
I'm playing with the idea of getting an Aimpoint Micro, AD CASV mount, and may Troy Micro sights.
Not sure how it is going to play out, so maybe it won't be an expensive mistake.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By nsl:
How high is it from the top of the rail to the center of the lense on the Steiner?
Have you tried any other optics on the gun?
I'm playing with the idea of getting an Aimpoint Micro, AD CASV mount, and may Troy Micro sights.
Not sure how it is going to play out, so maybe it won't be an expensive mistake.
Center of the window of the MRS looks like it's somewhere between 3/4" and 1".

I gave my EOTech 558 a try and it feels a little high on the ARX's raised rail. Scopes are a bit high too, although I don't have low mounts so that could mitigate that. Didn't measure the RMR but it comes in at similar height to the MRS. The MRS and RMR are, IMO, perfect height over the ARX's raised top rail for a good deep cheekweld with an unmodified ARX stock. Advantage to MRS since it's enclosed, so no dust or dirt gets on the emitter, and there's quite a bit less tint and distortion than the RMR.

Originally Posted By Capta:

HI, can you take a ruler and measure from the top of the picatinny rail to the top of the front sight blade?  I'm interested in these sights but need them to clear a Dbal when deployed.  Thanks!
1.4" above rail, so the height of standard A2 sights looks like.
Link Posted: 8/13/2017 7:47:10 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Master_Blaster] [#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By vellnueve:
It was posted on the previous page.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By vellnueve:
Originally Posted By runner6m:

Botach's got the ARX-200 on their site. I'm not sure how long it's been there, but maybe this is a sign of things to come? Maybe? Fingers crossed...

Botach ARX-200

https://cdn2.bigcommerce.com/server4300/9j9zreeu/products/54042/images/127477/a1__34953.1500997100.1200.1200.png?c=2
It was posted on the previous page.
Yes, it's a p. 51 dupe.  That might be a first for this site.

I doubt their site webmaster would mistakenly create a product listing page & post it on a public server unless they were flagrantly irresponsible.  Maybe call Botach & ask about it.  Either they've been hacked, or something's legitimately up & they are market campaigning early for customers before the drop.
Link Posted: 8/13/2017 8:42:11 PM EDT
[#21]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Master_Blaster:


flagrantly irresponsible.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Master_Blaster:


flagrantly irresponsible.

Botach.
Link Posted: 8/14/2017 12:31:17 AM EDT
[Last Edit: Master_Blaster] [#22]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By vellnueve:
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By vellnueve:
Originally Posted By Master_Blaster:


flagrantly irresponsible.

Botach.
I'm trying to stay positive.

ETA, the site does say the following:

Brand: Beretta
SKU: BERETTA-ARX200
Availability: COMING SOON

Seems legit.
Link Posted: 8/14/2017 11:08:44 AM EDT
[#23]
Just picked up an ARX 100 yesterday. Wow, what a handy little rifle!
Link Posted: 8/14/2017 1:18:00 PM EDT
[#24]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Frost7:
Center of the window of the MRS looks like it's somewhere between 3/4" and 1".

I gave my EOTech 558 a try and it feels a little high on the ARX's raised rail. Scopes are a bit high too, although I don't have low mounts so that could mitigate that. Didn't measure the RMR but it comes in at similar height to the MRS. The MRS and RMR are, IMO, perfect height over the ARX's raised top rail for a good deep cheekweld with an unmodified ARX stock. Advantage to MRS since it's enclosed, so no dust or dirt gets on the emitter, and there's quite a bit less tint and distortion than the RMR.

1.4" above rail, so the height of standard A2 sights looks like.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Frost7:
Originally Posted By nsl:
How high is it from the top of the rail to the center of the lense on the Steiner?
Have you tried any other optics on the gun?
I'm playing with the idea of getting an Aimpoint Micro, AD CASV mount, and may Troy Micro sights.
Not sure how it is going to play out, so maybe it won't be an expensive mistake.
Center of the window of the MRS looks like it's somewhere between 3/4" and 1".

I gave my EOTech 558 a try and it feels a little high on the ARX's raised rail. Scopes are a bit high too, although I don't have low mounts so that could mitigate that. Didn't measure the RMR but it comes in at similar height to the MRS. The MRS and RMR are, IMO, perfect height over the ARX's raised top rail for a good deep cheekweld with an unmodified ARX stock. Advantage to MRS since it's enclosed, so no dust or dirt gets on the emitter, and there's quite a bit less tint and distortion than the RMR.

Originally Posted By Capta:

HI, can you take a ruler and measure from the top of the picatinny rail to the top of the front sight blade?  I'm interested in these sights but need them to clear a Dbal when deployed.  Thanks!
1.4" above rail, so the height of standard A2 sights looks like.
Couple of other questions - is the rear sight a ranging rear sight, with the different apertures at different heights?  Or are the apertures all on the same plane?  I guess the easiest way to tell would be measuring/eyeballing from the rim to the center of the small aperture and also to the center of the large aperture.  And, would you say that the height folded is about the same as a Troy, or at least no taller?  They look a little thick in the folded position is why I'm asking.
Link Posted: 8/14/2017 1:30:48 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Frost7] [#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Capta:
Couple of other questions - is the rear sight a ranging rear sight, with the different apertures at different heights?  Or are the apertures all on the same plane?  I guess the easiest way to tell would be measuring/eyeballing from the rim to the center of the small aperture and also to the center of the large aperture.  And, would you say that the height folded is about the same as a Troy, or at least no taller?  They look a little thick in the folded position is why I'm asking.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Capta:
Originally Posted By Frost7:
Originally Posted By nsl:
How high is it from the top of the rail to the center of the lense on the Steiner?
Have you tried any other optics on the gun?
I'm playing with the idea of getting an Aimpoint Micro, AD CASV mount, and may Troy Micro sights.
Not sure how it is going to play out, so maybe it won't be an expensive mistake.
Center of the window of the MRS looks like it's somewhere between 3/4" and 1".

I gave my EOTech 558 a try and it feels a little high on the ARX's raised rail. Scopes are a bit high too, although I don't have low mounts so that could mitigate that. Didn't measure the RMR but it comes in at similar height to the MRS. The MRS and RMR are, IMO, perfect height over the ARX's raised top rail for a good deep cheekweld with an unmodified ARX stock. Advantage to MRS since it's enclosed, so no dust or dirt gets on the emitter, and there's quite a bit less tint and distortion than the RMR.

Originally Posted By Capta:

HI, can you take a ruler and measure from the top of the picatinny rail to the top of the front sight blade?  I'm interested in these sights but need them to clear a Dbal when deployed.  Thanks!
1.4" above rail, so the height of standard A2 sights looks like.
Couple of other questions - is the rear sight a ranging rear sight, with the different apertures at different heights?  Or are the apertures all on the same plane?  I guess the easiest way to tell would be measuring/eyeballing from the rim to the center of the small aperture and also to the center of the large aperture.  And, would you say that the height folded is about the same as a Troy, or at least no taller?  They look a little thick in the folded position is why I'm asking.
The small hole is 1 17/32 in. above the rail. The medium hole is at 1 33/64 in. Large hole looks like around 1 1/2 in.

They fold to a smidge higher than my Troy Mediums. Just measured the Troy Mediums on my 901 and they folded to 1/2 in. LPA MAS7s fold to somewhere betwen 9/16 and 5/8.
Link Posted: 8/14/2017 1:43:34 PM EDT
[#26]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By TATBME:
New light setup.

http://i.imgur.com/KLilaJV.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/wg4HxRP.jpg
View Quote
What sights are these?
Link Posted: 8/14/2017 1:54:19 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Frost7] [#27]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Armed_Philosopher:
What sights are these?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Armed_Philosopher:
Originally Posted By TATBME:
New light setup.

http://i.imgur.com/KLilaJV.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/wg4HxRP.jpg
What sights are these?
Looks like the CZ Scorpion/Bren sights.
Link Posted: 8/14/2017 2:17:42 PM EDT
[#28]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Frost7:


Looks like the CZ Scorpion/Bren sights.
View Quote
Thank you, I quite like the look of those.
Link Posted: 8/15/2017 12:09:09 AM EDT
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Frost7:


Looks like the CZ Scorpion/Bren sights.
View Quote
Yes they are, I was an early adopter of the Bren and those are the sights that came on it. I switched them out for some Magpuls, they are right at home on the ARX with its high rail.
Link Posted: 8/15/2017 4:29:03 AM EDT
[Last Edit: Capta] [#30]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Frost7:


The small hole is 1 17/32 in. above the rail. The medium hole is at 1 33/64 in. Large hole looks like around 1 1/2 in.

They fold to a smidge higher than my Troy Mediums. Just measured the Troy Mediums on my 901 and they folded to 1/2 in. LPA MAS7s fold to somewhere betwen 9/16 and 5/8.
View Quote
Sounds like it might be 100m/200m/300m/400m if anything.  It also sounds like they'll probably fit under an ACOG, which is another concern.
Thank you for the information, it'll help me make this decision!
Link Posted: 9/5/2017 2:16:49 PM EDT
[#31]
Are the factory SBRs LEO/MIL only?

https://www.botach.com/beretta-arx100-sbr-w-10-barrel/
Link Posted: 9/6/2017 7:45:39 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Master_Blaster] [#32]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Curare:
Are the factory SBRs LEO/MIL only?

https://www.botach.com/beretta-arx100-sbr-w-10-barrel/
View Quote
No, but it would still require a F3 for transfer to a LGS, then F4 process for you (or a trust) to take possession.  Botach could theoretically have a govt-only policy for NFA transfers, but I'm not seeing anything stating so on that page.

Edited because punked by autocorrect.
Link Posted: 9/6/2017 9:06:57 PM EDT
[#33]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Master_Blaster:


No, but it would still require a F3 for transfer to a LGS, then F4 process for you (or a trust) to take possession.  Botach could theoretically have a govt-only policy for NFATCA transfers, but I'm not seeing anything stating so on that page.
View Quote
NFATCA?
Link Posted: 9/7/2017 4:08:14 PM EDT
[#34]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By vellnueve:
NFATCA?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By vellnueve:
Originally Posted By Master_Blaster:


No, but it would still require a F3 for transfer to a LGS, then F4 process for you (or a trust) to take possession.  Botach could theoretically have a govt-only policy for NFATCA transfers, but I'm not seeing anything stating so on that page.
NFATCA?
Just the facts, ma'am.
Link Posted: 9/7/2017 8:43:36 PM EDT
[#35]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Master_Blaster:


Just the facts, ma'am.
View Quote
What the hell does NFATCA have to do with anything?
Link Posted: 9/8/2017 9:46:06 PM EDT
[#36]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By vellnueve:
What the hell does NFATCA have to do with anything?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By vellnueve:
Originally Posted By Master_Blaster:


Just the facts, ma'am.
What the hell does NFATCA have to do with anything?
It doesn't.  Don't know why you mentioned traders & collectors in this context, because it's a factory SBR in question, which does require the usual NFA form submissions.  Coming from off the factory doesn't mitigate that requirement.
Link Posted: 9/8/2017 10:04:16 PM EDT
[#37]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Master_Blaster:


It doesn't.  Don't know why you mentioned traders & collectors in this context, because it's a factory SBR in question, which does require the usual NFA form submissions.  Coming from off the factory doesn't mitigate that requirement.
View Quote
I didn't. You mentioned it in your post.
Link Posted: 9/8/2017 10:46:31 PM EDT
[#38]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By vellnueve:


I didn't. You mentioned it in your post.
View Quote
D'oh!  I actually didn't type that.  Autocorrect strikes again.
Link Posted: 9/15/2017 9:38:47 AM EDT
[Last Edit: Conqueror] [#39]
Those of you with the Shooting Sight trigger, do you like the rubberized coating?

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Johnson184:

Anyone? Would also appreciate some info on how well the ARX100 runs suppressed.
View Quote
I know that was an old question, but I coudn't see if anyone answered it. Runs great. Mine is a ~9.5" SBR. I'm still working on the gas system for unsuppressed fire, but suppressed, it runs great. Much less gassy than ARs since it can vent through both sides of the receiver and there's no charging handle next to your face. That was with a Saker, which I felt was too nose-heavy on such a light SBR. My Surefire Mini just got out of jail but I haven't shot it yet.

Link Posted: 9/15/2017 10:08:22 AM EDT
[#40]
Love the rubber coating on the trigger, the SS trigger is the best upgrade you can do to the ARX bud.
Link Posted: 9/16/2017 8:53:10 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Frost7] [#41]
Anyone tried an X-15 drum magazine by chance in the ARX? I know Magpul D60s won't work per others' reports. My Surefire 60s kindasorta work, but have to be pushed, and then jam up upon attempting to eject the magazine and are a bitch to remove, so they're basically useless. Would be fun to have a high cap range toy magazine that could be used.
Link Posted: 9/17/2017 5:28:16 AM EDT
[#42]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Conqueror:
Those of you with the Shooting Sight trigger, do you like the rubberized coating?



I know that was an old question, but I coudn't see if anyone answered it. Runs great. Mine is a ~9.5" SBR. I'm still working on the gas system for unsuppressed fire, but suppressed, it runs great. Much less gassy than ARs since it can vent through both sides of the receiver and there's no charging handle next to your face. That was with a Saker, which I felt was too nose-heavy on such a light SBR. My Surefire Mini just got out of jail but I haven't shot it yet.

http://i.imgur.com/IbWsKBD.jpg
View Quote
'

Very nice. I understand Magpuls don't necessarily work with these rifles. Did you make modifications to the mags?
Link Posted: 9/17/2017 8:25:56 AM EDT
[#43]
Magpul gen 3s don't work. The 2s work fine.
Link Posted: 9/17/2017 8:40:36 AM EDT
[#44]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By sgwlower:
Magpul gen 3s don't work. The 2s work fine.
View Quote
So do Gen 1s.
Link Posted: 9/17/2017 8:48:51 AM EDT
[#45]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By vellnueve:


So do Gen 1s.
View Quote
Yes the originals work in the ARX.
Link Posted: 9/17/2017 9:36:05 AM EDT
[#46]
What changed in the Gen 3 mag?
Link Posted: 9/17/2017 9:48:31 AM EDT
[#47]
There is a ledge on the back of the mag to prevent "over insertion" in the SCAR. It gets caught going into the arx mag well and will not allow it to seat.
Link Posted: 9/17/2017 10:13:01 AM EDT
[#48]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By sgwlower:
There is a ledge on the back of the mag to prevent "over insertion" in the SCAR. It gets caught going into the arx mag well and will not allow it to seat.
View Quote
Yeah i'm fairly sure you could grind the overinsertion stop and make them work. Waiting for someone to try it with their D60.
Link Posted: 9/17/2017 5:19:31 PM EDT
[#49]
Thanks for the information.
Link Posted: 9/17/2017 9:30:58 PM EDT
[#50]
I know about 30-rounders... was wondering if there are any high caps that work since the D60 is out and my Surefire won't eject. No experience with the X-15.
Page / 124
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top