|
|
Posted: 7/25/2012 10:53:42 PM
Originally Posted By mike82352:
Has anyone tried taping this filter in front of a red laser to see if it makes it like an IR laser? It worked really well when taped in front of my 1200lum cree LED flash light. It worked just like an IR flash light, It did have a red glow if viewed from the front, but worked great with the PVS-14. I don't have a red laser to try this with. I do not believe that would work well at all, a red laser is mostly 635nm to maybe about 670nm, so the filter would just nullify it as it cuts off primarily below 720nm. Your Cree 1200 lumen led puts out lots of visible light waves but not very much in the IR spectrum comparatively speaking, you would be much better off with a dedicated IR LED that only puts out 805 to 850nm IR wavelengths. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/1/2012 10:20:15 PM
Hey all - great idea, SkyPup. Got my Chinese ebay filter yesterday, and I've had only a limited opportunity to experiment. It did make the image noticeably darker, but my tube's specs aren't going to win any prizes. Since many of you all have a much better idea of the specifics of how this filter affects PVS-14 use, I'm going to ask some questions for my benefit as well as newcomers to the thread.
How exactly does this extend the window of NVG use at dawn and dusk? I realize that it blocks most visible light, but doesn't the sun give off a ton of IR light as well? I would love to use my 14 in a greater variety of lighting conditions but I'm not sure what to look for to be sure I'm not causing too much wear on the tube. If it matters, my 14 is autogated and has manual gain. The filter did considerably reduce the appearance of lights, and it did almost totally eliminate visible light shadows, which is interesting. I guess in a way visible light is a bonus as NVGs then magnify the light they cast on surroundings, but this wouldn't be relevant when using NVGs away from sources of artificial light. At the same time, perhaps protection from visible light is worth the loss of visible light amplification. Could you all that understand this far better than me kind of sum up the pros and cons of using this filter, as well as conditions under which you would and wouldn't use it? Also, my chinese filter was matte silver, but I took the sharpie to it and now it doesn't stick out so bad. Also, kinda unrelated, but am I right that the gain setting has nothing to do with the tube but only with how bright the image is in the eyepiece? So basically the only purpose of manual gain is for you to lower the brightness to where it's comfortable? Seriously, this is a great find, SkyPup. Thanks for y'alls input in advance. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/2/2012 12:06:09 AM
Maybe I missed this but does the Polaroid IR720 FIlter thread on a -14?
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/2/2012 11:43:37 AM
Originally Posted By SigOwner_P229:
Originally Posted By 50BMGdoesitforme:
Well hell indeed - Ebay's out of these now too. Here's a non-Opteka brand - anybody try them? Hate to be the guinea pig, but $12.44 ain't bad. But if the ring is sort of matte stainless, I'd be hesitant to hang that off the end of my 14s. NVG fashion police and all... http://www.ebay.com/itm/30mm-720nm-Infrared-X-Ray-IR-Pass-Filter-30mm-720nm-/220913838052?pt=UK_CamerasPhoto_CameraAccessories_CameraLensesFilters_JN&hash=item336f7da7e4#ht_2656wt_1163 I just ordered 2 of these a couple days ago, I'll update here when i get them. Negative on these filters. Picture showed black, no mention of silver anywhere in the description, I received silver and the seller in hong kong is being alittle bitch about it. He is very apologetic but he keeps repeatedly asking me if there is any way that I can keep them and he give me partial refund. I said no, I want black ones so I would like a full refund. He doesn't get it, now he wants me to send them back to him. I said I'm only sending them back if he pays the postage because he is the one that chose to substitute somethign different. He is going to shit a brick when he finds out USPS postage to hong kong is $35. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/21/2012 3:01:47 PM
Anyone have a through-the-filter pic of a standard 5mW visible red laser next to a .7mW or .1mW infrared laser?
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/22/2012 12:45:58 AM
Originally Posted By ncorry:
Anyone have a through-the-filter pic of a standard 5mW visible red laser next to a .7mW or .1mW infrared laser? I tried to take some photos tonight, but I learned I suck at taking NV photos. With my NEPVS-14 through the filter, a red 5mW laser is much crisper and has almost no bloom with a dot size of about 3" at 25 yards. With my .1 mW laser there is considerable bloom with a fuzzy bloomed dot size of about 18" at 25 yards. If you are looking for precision and you don't mind a unaided eye visible laser dot, I would without a doubt go with the red laser and the filter. IR laser bloom sucks if you want precision. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/22/2012 11:33:40 AM
Thank you sir. If using an illuminator, does the 18 inch dot/ bloom of the .1mW at 25 get reduced much? I realize that illuminators come in different classes, but can you give me an idea?
Skypup graciously uploaded several pics comparing the .7 to the .1 mW IR lasers at 175 yards or so, and one pic of both on a tree at about 30 yards. The pics at the link I posted above. He said that in the 30 yard pic, the two IR lasers were a foot apart. Based on that, it looks like the dot is about 2 feet wide at 30 yards. I don't have an IR laser and am looking at getting one- trying to decide if I'd be better served with the .1 or the .7mW. I've been surprised with the visible red laser and the filter. I guess I was expecting it to be a lot brighter, even with the filter. If I use a low powered illuminator (Insight M6X with IR filter), I lose the visible red laser dot at 30 yards or so. If I use a more powerful illuminator (450mW ATN or Streamlight SuperTac), I can't see the visible red dot at all. I actually got the IR filter before my PVS14 came in, so I've not ran it without it, and may never take it off. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/22/2012 1:56:42 PM
With an illuminator, the IR laser dot is much much more precise than with no illuminator. In fact, I would say that to effectively and precisely use a IR laser, a IR illuminator is almost mandatory in order to tame the bloom. I have a Surefire V2 Vampire IR handheld and a Inforce WML weapon mounted IR light and both do not wash out the .1 mW IR laser at ranges out to 50-75 yards. Like I said above, it actually makes the IR laser look much better and drops the dot size down to 2"-3" in size with no bloom. I have not tried the .1mW at farther distances with a IR illuminator, but I can tell you that without the illuminator I can easily see the dot on the neighbors house at over a quarter mile away. At that distance it would be useless for aiming, but you can still see it. The photos of Skypup's that you referenced look very similar to my setup at closer ranges without a illuminator. If he took those same photos with the illuminator on, at least the .1mW IR laser would look very crisp and precise. I don't have a .7mW so I can't say what that would look like.
Sorry if I confused you with my above post. I assumed you meant to use the red or IR laser without a IR illuminator. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/30/2012 8:38:55 PM
[Last Edit: 8/30/2012 8:51:56 PM by SkyPup]
Looks like this is the right one now on E-bay:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/NEW-30mm-IR-INFRARED-FILTER-720nm-R72-Sony-Olympus-Canon-Nikon-Pentax-Tamron-/180946788935?_trkparms=aid%3D222002%26algo%3DSIC.FIT%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D11%26meid%3D1410036083343531663%26pid%3D100011%26prg%3D1016%26rk%3D3%26#payId I think it is a Hoya filter instead of an Opteka, but looks virtually the same externally if the bandwidth blocking is still the same, ie everything below 720nm visible wavelengths are cut off only allowing non visible IR above 720nm to pass through.... |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/30/2012 9:30:57 PM
I don't use mine w/o the filter anymore, it just confers too many benefits to not use it. I do wish that someone made one that would sit flush with the objective lens housing though. Essentially, a LIF only w/ 720nm filter. Going to google it, maybe someone does make them somewhere...
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/30/2012 9:44:32 PM
There are some other visible wavelength blocking 30mm lens available from Germany but they are way too expensive to try out, they cost hundreds of bucks each.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/31/2012 8:49:49 AM
so is there a version that will fit my 25mm and 75mm c-mount lens?
even better would be a filter with a coating to reduce glare. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/31/2012 10:14:04 AM
Yes there are numerous sizes available for C-mounts.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/31/2012 4:16:54 PM
Where do I score one of these for a PVS-7/PVS-14?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/21/2012 6:59:54 PM
jb55 wrote me about a PM about utilizing this Trijicon Polarizing filter on the PVS-14 to improve the image:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/551738-REG/Trijicon_RX20_Reflex_Sight_Polarizing_Filter.html I told him I did not think it would be a good idea. A polarizing lens is a kind of filter of all visible wavelengths, but it does not work like the 720nm cutoff filter at all. Basically the PVS-14 image intensifier takes in visible and IR light waves up from about the low UV end of human vision of about 400nm to the higher IR end of human vision at 740nm on up to about 1,000nm IR that we cannot visualize at all. The low end UV has the most energy per photon, while the high end IR has the least energy per photon. A polarzing lens does not filter any of these wavelengths like the 720nm cut-off filter does, it simply stops light waves with a particular direction of polarisation, ie up and down or sideways orientation of the light waves, allowing only one orientation of light waves to pass the filter. It would not do anything at all besides decreasing up to 99% of all the light entering into the PVS-14, which would decrease its utility tremendously. My opinion is that this is an absolute NO-GO, I had investigated this previously and figured that it was a bad idea based on the physics of a polarizing filter. It would work great on a day scope in bright sunlight to increase the color contrast and increase the blues and greens, but not on NVO based on basic physics of light. However, I have not personally tired it out.... _________________________ |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/24/2012 4:18:11 AM
Originally Posted By SkyPup:
Looks like this is the right one now on E-bay: http://www.ebay.com/itm/NEW-30mm-IR-INFRARED-FILTER-720nm-R72-Sony-Olympus-Canon-Nikon-Pentax-Tamron-/180946788935?_trkparms=aid%3D222002%26algo%3DSIC.FIT%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D11%26meid%3D1410036083343531663%26pid%3D100011%26prg%3D1016%26rk%3D3%26#payId I think it is a Hoya filter instead of an Opteka, but looks virtually the same externally if the bandwidth blocking is still the same, ie everything below 720nm visible wavelengths are cut off only allowing non visible IR above 720nm to pass through.... Thanks for the info. I just ordered one to try out. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/24/2012 6:56:09 PM
Only thing I can think of with the polarizing filter is if you have a powerful IR Illuminator, you would probably be able to avoid any washout and for instance, read a license plate or a sign that you wouldn't be able to without a polarization filter.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/24/2012 9:52:38 PM
I think filter threads 30.5mm is the proper size. The 30mm will screw in just don't strip threads. I have a 30.5mm ordered will post how it fits. The 30mm with 3.5x lens has worked loose several times.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/25/2012 12:04:41 AM
Was just outside at our new home and watching the neighborhood Black Bears. We have a mother and her 2 cubs that visit pretty frequently (twice yesterday for instance). All due to an ignorant neighbor that apparently enjoys picking up 2-3 trash bags of garbage strewn all over his acreage and mine. Pretty hilarious to watch him bitching and whining the whole time when I have on two occasions explained to him what to do to avoid the problem.
Anyhow, was outside with my OPMOD PVS-14 and scouting around when I saw the bears dining on the property line between our lots. The idiot neighbor has now installed a GIANT floodlight that points directly at the trash cans, and coincidentally towards the master bedroom of our house. The bears apparently appreciate the light for locating the dinner, but would rather tote the food about 75-100 yards closer to my house. Must make it a little more like ambient/romantic lighting. So, this flood light is amazingly bright and with the Optek filter on I can glance at it for short periods of time with no problem. I can only imagine how fried my NOD would be if it weren't for this awesome filter. As always SkyPup: Thanks! See you Wednesday night I think! Coming up a night early, maybe the hogs will come out for us? |
|
|