|
|
Posted: 6/14/2012 8:01:47 PM
Originally Posted By Donner_und_Blitzen: Originally Posted By tony_k: Originally Posted By EBK: Originally Posted By leonpiper69: saw an add on GB not more than 3 or 4 months ago for an hk g3 type clone and the paddle mag had been installed so that it was now a push pin receiver!!!! it was posted on hkpro, if i could remember what section it was in a would find it and post a link. sorta found it cant get on GB (at work on gov comp) so i cant pos tthe link to the GB add. Care to explain what is illegal about this? not being a smart ass I truly dont know? How does a paddle mag release make the gun a no-no? Installing the paddle mag requires drilling the receiver so it also can accept a full-auto lower. InATF's eyes, that's the same as drilling the autosear pin hole on an AR15: It constitutes manufacturing an unregistered machine gun. There must be an ATF approved method of installing a paddle mag release because there are several HK clone builders who offer this service. Blind hole. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/14/2012 9:18:32 PM
Originally Posted By tony_k: Originally Posted By Chas8008: Originally Posted By rbrooks: OP is an ATF plant I wish I had a sweet .gov job. I am just am unemployed smuck.. Will anyone vouch for me ? ![]() LOL! I'll vouch for ya ... if you were an ATF plant, you wouldn't be waiting the same seven months for Form 4's that the rest of us do. Now, can I shoot your M10/45 at Hernando? Thanks Tony, I will bring it for you. Heck I have a 50cal can 3/4 full of 45acp with your name on it, (load your own mags though) I ran the Colt a little today, 700 rounds worth with two beta dumps. ![]() |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/15/2012 10:09:40 AM
Originally Posted By Chas8008:
Originally Posted By tony_k:
Originally Posted By Chas8008:
Originally Posted By rbrooks:
OP is an ATF plant I wish I had a sweet .gov job. I am just am unemployed smuck.. Will anyone vouch for me ?
LOL! I'll vouch for ya ... if you were an ATF plant, you wouldn't be waiting the same seven months for Form 4's that the rest of us do. Now, can I shoot your M10/45 at Hernando? Thanks Tony, I will bring it for you. Heck I have a 50cal can 3/4 full of 45acp with your name on it, (load your own mags though) I ran the Colt a little today, 700 rounds worth with two beta dumps.
It's just a fun thing to post |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/15/2012 10:31:57 AM
Originally Posted By rbrooks: I figured. Originally Posted By Chas8008: Originally Posted By tony_k: Originally Posted By Chas8008: Originally Posted By rbrooks: OP is an ATF plant I wish I had a sweet .gov job. I am just am unemployed smuck.. Will anyone vouch for me ? ![]() LOL! I'll vouch for ya ... if you were an ATF plant, you wouldn't be waiting the same seven months for Form 4's that the rest of us do. Now, can I shoot your M10/45 at Hernando? Thanks Tony, I will bring it for you. Heck I have a 50cal can 3/4 full of 45acp with your name on it, (load your own mags though) I ran the Colt a little today, 700 rounds worth with two beta dumps. ![]() It's just a fun thing to post |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/15/2012 11:08:50 AM
My favorite was an UZI SBR with no paperwork that was used in a shooting. I alerted the ATF to see if they wanted to charge the guy with that as well, and after duly consulting records, they informed me that they would not, as it was not illegal and had been made and sold as a pistol. I pointed out to the man on the telephone that it in fact had a working folding stock attached, and that I was physically holding an UZI with a 10 inch barrel and a folding stock which was used in a crime by a thug, and that maybe he could take my word for it that it was no longer a pistol.
He then hung up on me. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/15/2012 11:13:55 AM
Originally Posted By scotchymcdrinkerbean: My favorite was an UZI SBR with no paperwork that was used in a shooting. I alerted the ATF to see if they wanted to charge the guy with that as well, and after duly consulting records, they informed me that they would not, as it was not illegal and had been made and sold as a pistol. I pointed out to the man on the telephone that it in fact had a working folding stock attached, and that I was physically holding an UZI with a 10 inch barrel and a folding stock which was used in a crime by a thug, and that maybe he could take my word for it that it was no longer a pistol. He then hung up on me. Wow, What does your Dept do with such guns, and gun is general? |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/15/2012 11:23:21 AM
Originally Posted By Chas8008:
Originally Posted By scotchymcdrinkerbean:
My favorite was an UZI SBR with no paperwork that was used in a shooting. I alerted the ATF to see if they wanted to charge the guy with that as well, and after duly consulting records, they informed me that they would not, as it was not illegal and had been made and sold as a pistol. I pointed out to the man on the telephone that it in fact had a working folding stock attached, and that I was physically holding an UZI with a 10 inch barrel and a folding stock which was used in a crime by a thug, and that maybe he could take my word for it that it was no longer a pistol. He then hung up on me. Wow, What does your Dept do with such guns, and gun is general? Assuming a guilty verdict, after trial, and after appropriate appelate delays, all firearms are destroyed. Heck, we'll even destroy stolen firearms without notifying the owners (though plenty of officers will try to locate the owner and have the owner bug porperty and evidence––-in which case the owner will eventually get their weapon back.) In cases of not guilty verdicts or case dismissal, the weapons will be returned, if asked for, usually*, so long as the person is not a prohibited person. (My stolen Para-Ord P-16-40 was destroyed, for example, with not one single attempt to notify me that it was recovered.) *I say "usually" because there is a court case going on right now where the department and the D.A.'s office are being sued to make us/them release a man's firearm that was seized in '06. I do not know the details of the case though. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/15/2012 11:28:28 AM
Originally Posted By scotchymcdrinkerbean: Originally Posted By Chas8008: Originally Posted By scotchymcdrinkerbean: My favorite was an UZI SBR with no paperwork that was used in a shooting. I alerted the ATF to see if they wanted to charge the guy with that as well, and after duly consulting records, they informed me that they would not, as it was not illegal and had been made and sold as a pistol. I pointed out to the man on the telephone that it in fact had a working folding stock attached, and that I was physically holding an UZI with a 10 inch barrel and a folding stock which was used in a crime by a thug, and that maybe he could take my word for it that it was no longer a pistol. He then hung up on me. Wow, What does your Dept do with such guns, and gun is general? Assuming a guilty verdict, after trial, and after appropriate appelate delays, all firearms are destroyed. Heck, we'll even destroy stolen firearms without notifying the owners (though plenty of officers will try to locate the owner and have the owner bug porperty and evidence––-in which case the owner will eventually get their weapon back.) In cases of not guilty verdicts or case dismissal, the weapons will be returned, if asked for, usually*, so long as the person is not a prohibited person. (My stolen Para-Ord P-16-40 was destroyed, for example, with not one single attempt to notify me that it was recovered.) *I say "usually" because there is a court case going on right now where the department and the D.A.'s office are being sued to make us/them release a man's firearm that was seized in '06. I do not know the details of the case though. Your own Dept? Can you sue? That is Real F-ed up. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/15/2012 11:31:15 AM
[Last Edit: 6/15/2012 11:33:25 AM by scotchymcdrinkerbean]
Originally Posted By Chas8008:
Originally Posted By scotchymcdrinkerbean:
Originally Posted By Chas8008:
Originally Posted By scotchymcdrinkerbean:
My favorite was an UZI SBR with no paperwork that was used in a shooting. I alerted the ATF to see if they wanted to charge the guy with that as well, and after duly consulting records, they informed me that they would not, as it was not illegal and had been made and sold as a pistol. I pointed out to the man on the telephone that it in fact had a working folding stock attached, and that I was physically holding an UZI with a 10 inch barrel and a folding stock which was used in a crime by a thug, and that maybe he could take my word for it that it was no longer a pistol. He then hung up on me. Wow, What does your Dept do with such guns, and gun is general? Assuming a guilty verdict, after trial, and after appropriate appelate delays, all firearms are destroyed. Heck, we'll even destroy stolen firearms without notifying the owners (though plenty of officers will try to locate the owner and have the owner bug porperty and evidence––-in which case the owner will eventually get their weapon back.) In cases of not guilty verdicts or case dismissal, the weapons will be returned, if asked for, usually*, so long as the person is not a prohibited person. (My stolen Para-Ord P-16-40 was destroyed, for example, with not one single attempt to notify me that it was recovered.) *I say "usually" because there is a court case going on right now where the department and the D.A.'s office are being sued to make us/them release a man's firearm that was seized in '06. I do not know the details of the case though. Your own Dept? Can you sue? That is Real F-ed up. Well, I could have submitted a request through the chain of command to get permission to sue, but I suspect my chances would have been low. I only found out about a few years after the fact anyway, and that was a while ago––-so even if decided to try and sue, I no longer can, as the tort was too long ago. ETA: To clarify, the gun was stolen in '02, recovered in '03, destroyed in early '04, and I learned of it in late '05. A month or so before everybody's attention down here got rather abruptly grabbed by a larger issue. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/15/2012 11:56:10 AM
Originally Posted By scotchymcdrinkerbean: Originally Posted By Chas8008: Originally Posted By scotchymcdrinkerbean: Originally Posted By Chas8008: Originally Posted By scotchymcdrinkerbean: My favorite was an UZI SBR with no paperwork that was used in a shooting. I alerted the ATF to see if they wanted to charge the guy with that as well, and after duly consulting records, they informed me that they would not, as it was not illegal and had been made and sold as a pistol. I pointed out to the man on the telephone that it in fact had a working folding stock attached, and that I was physically holding an UZI with a 10 inch barrel and a folding stock which was used in a crime by a thug, and that maybe he could take my word for it that it was no longer a pistol. He then hung up on me. Wow, What does your Dept do with such guns, and gun is general? Assuming a guilty verdict, after trial, and after appropriate appelate delays, all firearms are destroyed. Heck, we'll even destroy stolen firearms without notifying the owners (though plenty of officers will try to locate the owner and have the owner bug porperty and evidence––-in which case the owner will eventually get their weapon back.) In cases of not guilty verdicts or case dismissal, the weapons will be returned, if asked for, usually*, so long as the person is not a prohibited person. (My stolen Para-Ord P-16-40 was destroyed, for example, with not one single attempt to notify me that it was recovered.) *I say "usually" because there is a court case going on right now where the department and the D.A.'s office are being sued to make us/them release a man's firearm that was seized in '06. I do not know the details of the case though. Your own Dept? Can you sue? That is Real F-ed up. Well, I could have submitted a request through the chain of command to get permission to sue, but I suspect my chances would have been low. I only found out about a few years after the fact anyway, and that was a while ago––-so even if decided to try and sue, I no longer can, as the tort was too long ago. ETA: To clarify, the gun was stolen in '02, recovered in '03, destroyed in early '04, and I learned of it in late '05. A month or so before everybody's attention down here got rather abruptly grabbed by a larger issue. Still it was your own Dept. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/15/2012 12:17:13 PM
[Last Edit: 6/15/2012 12:18:15 PM by d1jinx]
Originally Posted By scotchymcdrinkerbean:
Assuming a guilty verdict, after trial, and after appropriate appelate delays, all firearms are destroyed. Heck, we'll even destroy stolen firearms without notifying the owners (though plenty of officers will try to locate the owner and have the owner bug porperty and evidence––-in which case the owner will eventually get their weapon back.) In cases of not guilty verdicts or case dismissal, the weapons will be returned, if asked for, usually*, so long as the person is not a prohibited person. (My stolen Para-Ord P-16-40 was destroyed, for example, with not one single attempt to notify me that it was recovered.) *I say "usually" because there is a court case going on right now where the department and the D.A.'s office are being sued to make us/them release a man's firearm that was seized in '06. I do not know the details of the case though Your own Dept? Can you sue? That is Real F-ed up. Well, I could have submitted a request through the chain of command to get permission to sue, but I suspect my chances would have been low. I only found out about a few years after the fact anyway, and that was a while ago––-so even if decided to try and sue, I no longer can, as the tort was too long ago. ETA: To clarify, the gun was stolen in '02, recovered in '03, destroyed in early '04, and I learned of it in late '05. A month or so before everybody's attention down here got rather abruptly grabbed by a larger issue. not trying to thread jack, but this brings a querstion to mind. When firarms are destroyed, ais there a record of serial numbers kept or submitted to the ATF? If the serial numbers even remained, I wonder if there is records kept somewhere so 10 years later, someone is not knocking at your door looking for that gun. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/15/2012 12:25:01 PM
Originally Posted By d1jinx:
Originally Posted By scotchymcdrinkerbean:
Assuming a guilty verdict, after trial, and after appropriate appelate delays, all firearms are destroyed. Heck, we'll even destroy stolen firearms without notifying the owners (though plenty of officers will try to locate the owner and have the owner bug porperty and evidence––-in which case the owner will eventually get their weapon back.) In cases of not guilty verdicts or case dismissal, the weapons will be returned, if asked for, usually*, so long as the person is not a prohibited person. (My stolen Para-Ord P-16-40 was destroyed, for example, with not one single attempt to notify me that it was recovered.) *I say "usually" because there is a court case going on right now where the department and the D.A.'s office are being sued to make us/them release a man's firearm that was seized in '06. I do not know the details of the case though Your own Dept? Can you sue? That is Real F-ed up. Well, I could have submitted a request through the chain of command to get permission to sue, but I suspect my chances would have been low. I only found out about a few years after the fact anyway, and that was a while ago––-so even if decided to try and sue, I no longer can, as the tort was too long ago. ETA: To clarify, the gun was stolen in '02, recovered in '03, destroyed in early '04, and I learned of it in late '05. A month or so before everybody's attention down here got rather abruptly grabbed by a larger issue. not trying to thread jack, but this brings a querstion to mind. When firarms are destroyed, ais there a record of serial numbers kept or submitted to the ATF? If the serial numbers even remained, I wonder if there is records kept somewhere so 10 years later, someone is not knocking at your door looking for that gun. Hmm. I don't know. I mean, there is going to be a record, barring data loss like Katrina, but I have no idea if the ATF is informed. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/15/2012 12:54:19 PM
[Last Edit: 6/15/2012 12:57:27 PM by d1jinx]
Originally Posted By scotchymcdrinkerbean:
Originally Posted By d1jinx:
Originally Posted By scotchymcdrinkerbean:
Assuming a guilty verdict, after trial, and after appropriate appelate delays, all firearms are destroyed. Heck, we'll even destroy stolen firearms without notifying the owners (though plenty of officers will try to locate the owner and have the owner bug porperty and evidence––-in which case the owner will eventually get their weapon back.) In cases of not guilty verdicts or case dismissal, the weapons will be returned, if asked for, usually*, so long as the person is not a prohibited person. (My stolen Para-Ord P-16-40 was destroyed, for example, with not one single attempt to notify me that it was recovered.) *I say "usually" because there is a court case going on right now where the department and the D.A.'s office are being sued to make us/them release a man's firearm that was seized in '06. I do not know the details of the case though Your own Dept? Can you sue? That is Real F-ed up. Well, I could have submitted a request through the chain of command to get permission to sue, but I suspect my chances would have been low. I only found out about a few years after the fact anyway, and that was a while ago––-so even if decided to try and sue, I no longer can, as the tort was too long ago. ETA: To clarify, the gun was stolen in '02, recovered in '03, destroyed in early '04, and I learned of it in late '05. A month or so before everybody's attention down here got rather abruptly grabbed by a larger issue. not trying to thread jack, but this brings a querstion to mind. When firarms are destroyed, ais there a record of serial numbers kept or submitted to the ATF? If the serial numbers even remained, I wonder if there is records kept somewhere so 10 years later, someone is not knocking at your door looking for that gun. Hmm. I don't know. I mean, there is going to be a record, barring data loss like Katrina, but I have no idea if the ATF is informed. I'm sure. someone somewhere is trying to account for everyfirearm out there. Sure it's an imposible task but i bet your ass, someone, somewhere is starting it and there might come a day, when they come lookking ( conspiracy theorist right). but in all seriousness, if Obama and his gun haters had there way, every gun would be accounted for, even if it was guns sold from today and afterwards. It's not as much work as you think to pull the FFL's paperwork and record names into an excell speadsheet.... and theres already record of which serial numbers are manufactured and to where they went... |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/15/2012 2:22:20 PM
Originally Posted By scotchymcdrinkerbean: My favorite was an UZI SBR with no paperwork that was used in a shooting. I alerted the ATF to see if they wanted to charge the guy with that as well, and after duly consulting records, they informed me that they would not, as it was not illegal and had been made and sold as a pistol. I pointed out to the man on the telephone that it in fact had a working folding stock attached, and that I was physically holding an UZI with a 10 inch barrel and a folding stock which was used in a crime by a thug, and that maybe he could take my word for it that it was no longer a pistol. He then hung up on me. They reserve prosecutions for normal working folk who are ignorant of the law. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/16/2012 3:10:40 PM
[Last Edit: 6/16/2012 3:55:58 PM by prebans]
As a FFL and as a licensed auctioneer with a real estate broker's license, I've seen more than my fair share. However, most are way more benign than you'd suspect. In order of commonality:
1. SBSes. I don't know what it is about Wisconsin, but it seems that every tenth or twelfth old red barn has an ancient breech loading single barrel shotgun that looks like it was dragged 100 miles down a dirt road. The barrel is chopped "a little short." The buttstock's always there, though cracks, splits, and accompanying "I done fix'ed it!" stock repairs are common. No criminal intent- it was done by gran'pappy back whenever to make the gun more easy to tote and use for blasting burrowing varmints and other crop destroying animals from the farm plow. Plenty of 12 and 20 gauges, though I see a lot of 16 gauges and some .410 bores too. Rode hard and put away wet, these are working guns that were purely concocted as a farming implement- no different than a seed spreader or a milking machine to the owner. Most of the farmers/would-be sellers have an inkling that the gun "might be a hair on the short side," but they have no clue just how much trouble their ancient farm tool could cause. ETA: I remember one farm with one of these SBSes. I was there to evaluate the farm for sale; the farmer was well into his 80s and it was "time for him and mama to relax." The kids all had jobs in different cities. He had an old single shot 20 gauge with a somewhere-around-12" barrel. This gun lived in a scabbard his mother hand-stitched for him. Mom even stitched on an additional pouch for spare shells! This gun moved between whatever tractor or sprayer or whatever he was using in the fields that day. There were at least half a dozen coats of varnish slopped on the wood and the metal blue would rate 10% on a clouded moonless night, but the old gun did its job well enough. I guess that I remember this one because of that hand-stitched scabbard and small shell pouch. 2. SBRs. Not under-the-table ARs or whatever- we're talking nearly always .22 caliber (short, long, and/or long rifle) single shots and pump gallery guns. No criminal intent- this was done back when you cut the gun to fit the boy. The vast majority of the would-be sellers are surprised to discover that their rifle is an inch or two under legal (it's rare to see much below a 14" barrel), though occasionally an elderly one (often that original boy) wondered now and again if their first rifle was a little short. Sentimental value usually keeps these old rifles around- most are shot out or can't function due to some internal part that broke during the Eisenhower (or earlier!) years. 3. SBRs again, but rifles cut into pistols. It wasn't always illegal (yet again, no criminal intent), and it was easier to save a good rifle with a destroyed stock by creating a pistol than it was to cobble up a home-made stock. The sellers usually have no idea there's a problem with the gun, and some don't even know it was ever anything but a handgun in the first place. They're usually surprised to discover just how troublesome their handgun really is in the eyes of the law. 4. AOWs, specifically items like the Stevens #35 Autoshot and the H&R Handy Gun. They were inexpensive and essentially did the job of item #1 when you didn't want to "ruin" a good "pot-filler" shotgun by cutting it down. No one ever believes that Great-Grandpa's old single shot handgun is "as illegal as a machine gun." (I've yet to meet ONE person who knew that their smooth bore handgun was a problem.) As above, no criminal intent. 5. Machine guns, specifically war trophies. I've been forced to walk away from bringbacks from every war from WW1 to Afghanistan. Sometimes it's a widow with her late husband's weird gun, other times it's a shitheel with something he stole from the base armory yesterday. Knowledge and criminal intent varies from "My dear departed Elmer had a MACHINE GUN??! Oh, my!" to "Toss me $500 and I'll get you plenty more where it came from...." Mike |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/22/2012 4:20:23 PM
[Last Edit: 6/22/2012 4:21:09 PM by sardo_67]
What about this, does that look less than 18?
Benelli M2 entry gun I saw today at a large shop. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/22/2012 4:54:31 PM
Originally Posted By sardo_67:
What about this, does that look less than 18? http://i113.photobucket.com/albums/n223/sardo_67/460655f8.jpg Benelli M2 entry gun I saw today at a large shop. That looks fine. 3" longer than the mag extension. Gig 'em, backbencher |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/8/2012 3:56:33 PM
Originally Posted By sardo_67:
What about this, does that look less than 18? http://i113.photobucket.com/albums/n223/sardo_67/460655f8.jpg Benelli M2 entry gun I saw today at a large shop. You mean cabelas haha? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/8/2012 10:53:47 PM
Had a customer come in yesterday, (not a gun shop) and we were chatting about guns, ARs in particular. He told me he had built a pistol on a carbine receiver, then added a VFG to it, then "took it apart." I told him it was real cheap insurance to buy a stripped receiver.
Do all felons brag about their achievements? Gig 'em, backbencher |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/10/2012 3:56:40 PM
Originally Posted By MaineBassFishin:
Originally Posted By sardo_67:
What about this, does that look less than 18? http://i113.photobucket.com/albums/n223/sardo_67/460655f8.jpg Benelli M2 entry gun I saw today at a large shop. You mean cabelas haha? yep hahaha |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/10/2012 6:41:54 PM
A guy I worked with for a bit was looking to sell some guns to get them out of the house and away from his kid. He was offering me a Mac for around $250-300. I was semi interested....until he dropped the fact that it had a suppressor. I asked about paperwork, and he told me it didn't need any
....that it was fine since it was an oil-filled suppressor.
I turned and ran. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/10/2012 7:35:17 PM
Originally Posted By scotchymcdrinkerbean: My favorite was an UZI SBR with no paperwork that was used in a shooting. I alerted the ATF to see if they wanted to charge the guy with that as well, and after duly consulting records, they informed me that they would not, as it was not illegal and had been made and sold as a pistol. I pointed out to the man on the telephone that it in fact had a working folding stock attached, and that I was physically holding an UZI with a 10 inch barrel and a folding stock which was used in a crime by a thug, and that maybe he could take my word for it that it was no longer a pistol. He then hung up on me. What the hell. We agonize over how deep SBR engraving has to be and other legal minutiae and they don't even care? |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/10/2012 7:47:23 PM
[Last Edit: 7/10/2012 8:10:25 PM by DvlDog]
My cousins husband died of heart failure. He had a small gunshop where he sold mostly hgh end trap guns and reloading components. In helping them clean the place out and catalog everything. They found a BAR under a display case. someone did a function check and yep, it was the real deal. I tried to explain to my retard cousins about NFA and the best thing they could do was bandsaw it into a dozen pieces and chuck it in the lake or call the ATF to come get it since the law breaker was dead. One of my older cousins intervened, said he knew someone who would buy it. I dont like him anyway, I hope he is in prison.
I havent talked to any of them since. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/12/2012 12:20:20 AM
Originally Posted By DvlDog:
My cousins husband died of heart failure. He had a small gunshop where he sold mostly hgh end trap guns and reloading components. In helping them clean the place out and catalog everything. They found a BAR under a display case. someone did a function check and yep, it was the real deal. I tried to explain to my retard cousins about NFA and the best thing they could do was bandsaw it into a dozen pieces and chuck it in the lake or call the ATF to come get it since the law breaker was dead. One of my older cousins intervened, said he knew someone who would buy it. I dont like him anyway, I hope he is in prison. I havent talked to any of them since. why destroy something like that? i mean stripping the receiver of all parts then cutting it up and loosing that middle part for good is ok but why destroy the entire gun? |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/13/2012 12:11:09 AM
Originally Posted By sardo_67: Originally Posted By DvlDog: My cousins husband died of heart failure. He had a small gunshop where he sold mostly hgh end trap guns and reloading components. In helping them clean the place out and catalog everything. They found a BAR under a display case. someone did a function check and yep, it was the real deal. I tried to explain to my retard cousins about NFA and the best thing they could do was bandsaw it into a dozen pieces and chuck it in the lake or call the ATF to come get it since the law breaker was dead. One of my older cousins intervened, said he knew someone who would buy it. I dont like him anyway, I hope he is in prison. I havent talked to any of them since. why destroy something like that? i mean stripping the receiver of all parts then cutting it up and loosing that middle part for good is ok but why destroy the entire gun? If it was papered then that it would be a bigass mistake to destroy it. ![]() |
|