|
|
Posted: 1/13/2009 10:16:35 PM
THE IMAGE ABOVE IS A PAID ADVERTISEMENT Prince Law Firm |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/17/2009 9:31:06 AM
Link is busted
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/19/2009 11:44:25 PM
Works for me
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/20/2009 2:20:19 AM
Thanks CS223. Very helpful!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/20/2009 5:21:30 AM
Works now and thanks!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/22/2009 10:31:03 PM
Originally Posted By CS223:
Recently published by an atty. should help with questions that frequently pop up. Prince Law Firm One would think that a law firm would know there's no such word as "irregardless"................ |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2009 5:27:54 AM
Originally Posted By BobCole:
Originally Posted By CS223:
Recently published by an atty. should help with questions that frequently pop up. Prince Law Firm One would think that a law firm would know there's no such word as "irregardless"................ Ha! I noticed that too. Someone should send them an email. that was a great read. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/30/2009 6:23:03 PM
Once you get it approved and get your SBR, you should stop by and show it to the dip shit LEO
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/2/2009 11:18:36 AM
They did my trust.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/3/2009 5:54:28 PM
[Last Edit: 2/3/2009 7:54:15 PM by Maryland_Shooter]
Bought into Class 3 today on the way home. Walther P22 with a can. Didn't sound too expensive until I paid the ATF stamp
ETA: Read the blog. Some good info, but when I saw the "word" "Irregardless" the grammar Nazi in me surfaced. There is no such word. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/6/2009 11:05:30 AM
[Last Edit: 2/6/2009 11:05:53 AM by retrodog]
Good info. Thanks for posting it. I'm setting up a trust for my new suppressor.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2009 8:30:19 PM
For all you grammar nazis who maintain that "irregardless" is NOT a word, you are wrong.
Irregardless is in fact a word, albeit an improper or non-standard one. It has been used in conversational as well as written english since at least the early 20th century. While it represents a redundancy in its form, so do many other words that are considered "proper" english, such as "debone" and "unravel". So, while as a grammar nazis you are right that "irregardless" is not the preferred, proper word to be used, it is in fact a word. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2009 9:16:50 PM
Nah - regardless means something.
Irregardless means what? regardless = despite Irregardless - despite despite? It repeats itself. Irregardless originated in dialectal American speech in the early 20th century. Its fairly widespread use in speech called it to the attention of usage commentators as early as 1927. The most frequently repeated remark about it is that “there is no such word.” There is such a word, however. It is still used primarily in speech, although it can be found from time to time in edited prose. Its reputation has not risen over the years, and it is still a long way from general acceptance. Use regardless instead. Same as ain't, which used mainly for effect in humor. While it may be a word, it's certainly not a word an educated lawyer should be using. Irregardless if it is a word or not, I ain't using it, no way, no how. Hey law guy, how's the weather. It was so cold here yesterday, I saw a lawyer with his hand in his own pocket. Joking! |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2009 11:57:06 PM
Snowing here off and on today. Like most cold blooded creatures, we lawyers tend to stay snug under our rocks and not move around much when the temperature drops. When the sun warms things up a little we come out and slither in and out of things, pockets or whatever. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2009 11:58:27 PM
Originally Posted By LawTalkingGuy:
Snowing here off and on today. Like most cold blooded creatures, we lawyers tend to stay snug under our rocks and not move around much when the temperature drops. When the sun warms things up a little we come out and slither in and out of things, pockets or whatever. Man at least you have a sense of humor! Kinda grey around here lately. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2009 12:02:47 AM
[Last Edit: 2/11/2009 12:04:04 AM by LawTalkingGuy]
We agree on much, including, it seems, that "irregardless" is at least a "word", although one we both would choose to not use.
Snowing here off and on today. Like most cold blooded creatures, we lawyers tend to stay snug under our rocks and not move around much when the temperature drops. When the sun warms things up a little we come out and slither in and out of things, pockets or whatever. ETA: Tried to make an edit and got a whole new post instead. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2009 12:47:48 PM
Originally Posted By LawTalkingGuy:
We agree on much, including, it seems, that "irregardless" is at least a "word", although one we both would choose to not use. Snowing here off and on today. Like most cold blooded creatures, we lawyers tend to stay snug under our rocks and not move around much when the temperature drops. When the sun warms things up a little we come out and slither in and out of things, pockets or whatever. ETA: Tried to make an edit and got a whole new post instead. ![]() Friend, I appreciate your good nature. Have a great day! |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/25/2009 10:15:06 AM
[Last Edit: 2/25/2009 10:15:37 AM by retrodog]
Man... I'm still trying to figure out what inflammable means. And why the hell do we drive on a parkway, but park on a driveway?
Oh, and thanks for the link. Great info. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2009 1:36:46 PM
So I've read people stating that we need to send in just the "declaration of trust", then I hear others saying that we need to send in the whole trust. I created my trust and ended up with three parts:
1. Instructions, Declaration of Trust 2. Declaration of Trust (signed and notarized) 3. Schedule A, Property in Trust 4. Assignment of Property (signed) 5. Instructions: Letter to the Successor Trustee 6. Letter to Successor Trustee (includes names of trustees, grantors, and beneficiary) Which of these are supposed to be sent in with the Form 4? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2009 1:39:24 PM
Originally Posted By retrodog:
So I've read people stating that we need to send in just the "declaration of trust", then I hear others saying that we need to send in the whole trust. I created my trust and ended up with three parts: 1. Instructions, Declaration of Trust 2. Declaration of Trust (signed and notarized) 3. Schedule A, Property in Trust 4. Assignment of Property (signed) 5. Instructions: Letter to the Successor Trustee 6. Letter to Successor Trustee (includes names of trustees, grantors, and beneficiary) Which of these are supposed to be sent in with the Form 4? I sent it all. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2009 3:01:27 PM
Originally Posted By Maryland_Shooter:
Originally Posted By retrodog:
So I've read people stating that we need to send in just the "declaration of trust", then I hear others saying that we need to send in the whole trust. I created my trust and ended up with three parts: 1. Instructions, Declaration of Trust 2. Declaration of Trust (signed and notarized) 3. Schedule A, Property in Trust 4. Assignment of Property (signed) 5. Instructions: Letter to the Successor Trustee 6. Letter to Successor Trustee (includes names of trustees, grantors, and beneficiary) Which of these are supposed to be sent in with the Form 4? I sent it all. A photo copy I'm guessing... |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/27/2009 5:06:08 PM
[Last Edit: 2/27/2009 5:06:18 PM by Maryland_Shooter]
Originally Posted By retrodog:
Originally Posted By Maryland_Shooter:
Originally Posted By retrodog:
So I've read people stating that we need to send in just the "declaration of trust", then I hear others saying that we need to send in the whole trust. I created my trust and ended up with three parts: 1. Instructions, Declaration of Trust 2. Declaration of Trust (signed and notarized) 3. Schedule A, Property in Trust 4. Assignment of Property (signed) 5. Instructions: Letter to the Successor Trustee 6. Letter to Successor Trustee (includes names of trustees, grantors, and beneficiary) Which of these are supposed to be sent in with the Form 4? I sent it all. A photo copy I'm guessing... Yup |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/28/2009 1:16:44 AM
I want to start a trust with my self and my brother... here is my question he isn't going to be 21 till late may, I am guessing that he can't be in it till he's 21 am I right? I am 23 and already have an SBR I registered threw my local guy here, I just want him to be able to use my cans or SBR with out me being there, I live in AZ and he is in CT. me being military I want my NFA items to go to someone I trust when I deploy rather than sit in a storage unit.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/28/2009 10:01:22 AM
Complicated issue using a Trust and moving an NFA item from its home jurisdiction
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/12/2009 12:38:46 AM
how is it complicated?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/12/2009 5:26:25 AM
Originally Posted By DTDK:
how is it complicated? Make him a trustee or life beneficiary and then fill out the ATF paperwork (actually there may or not be paperwork on a supressor - you'll have to check) to move it. |
|