Quote History Quoted:
Another one of
these threads.
I read both of the forums you posted and it is still just theories and lacking evidence.
Not sure why you keep posting these theory guns like they are proven facts.
View Quote
Exactly. "Theory guns" sums it up nicely . The theory being in my mind the absence of fact or at least it is a proposed idea, nothing more.
I want to believe......
I love getting into the details of manufacturers, parts, dates and history. Learning that stuff along with holding honest history in your hands is what I find appealing about collecting military items.
Those and the other rifles are nice finds but baring any documents, photos and proof, experienced collectors who are aware of all the humping up and pimpshining are naturally skeptical. I'm not pointing at you OP but it is just a fact in the surplus field. It is unfortunate we can't just admire and study a nice find nowadays but low life fakers seem to want to make a buck anyway possible. It is a turnoff to longtime collectors and a discouragement to those new to the hobby alike.
Shame. I miss the good old days.