User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 4/22/2017 9:48:32 PM EDT
What can you tell me about this 10/22? In particular, I'm interested in the barrel shroud, abbreviated forend, and stock. Thanks in advance!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/22/2017 10:41:48 PM EDT
[#1]
 looks like the stock is a cut down factory. Looks illegal unles it has a stamp. That poor ruger
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2017 6:49:37 PM EDT
[#2]
Yeah factory stock chopped down. Some type of handguard fitted on the top and looks like one of the EEZ cheek pads stuck on.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2017 7:53:38 PM EDT
[#3]
Looks like shit is what it looks like and is illegal without a stamp as another poster mentioned.
Terrible way to mess up a decent gun. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2017 8:47:27 PM EDT
[#4]
You don't have the rest of the Small Arms Review article it was in?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/23/2017 8:50:22 PM EDT
[#5]
Just a hunch, but it's probably chambered in 22LR
Barrel shroud looks like it's Choate |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/24/2017 6:35:18 AM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You don't have the rest of the Small Arms Review article it was in? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/24/2017 6:40:23 AM EDT
[#7]
Some one went full stupid on it.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/24/2017 6:41:08 AM EDT
[#8]
....
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/24/2017 7:23:21 AM EDT
[#9]
Green and red dots on the trigger guard, select fire?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/24/2017 7:53:36 AM EDT
[#10]
Yeah,chopped factory stock.
I will take a wild guess that it is set up to mount a can so somebody did a SBR stamp and went with a short barrel to keep the overall length reasonable when the can was mounted. If the guy who did the work doesn't have the proper FFL or didn't get the stamps he is a idiot Now let me think a bit about the huge drum mag. I do believe at some point there was some type of system to make a 10/22 full auto. Again , very stupid without the proper papers. If full auto the barrel shroud and the huge drum make all the sense in the world. I would shoot it for fun a couple of times |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/25/2017 10:43:07 AM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Green and red dots on the trigger guard, select fire? It's probably made from a really old machinegun - pre- May 1986, in fact. While I am not an expert on the NFA, I believe the old policy on machineguns was: - an NFA machinegun registration included a "free" SBR if the owner registered it that way (ie - only one NFA tax stamp required). Same thing with fully automatic cannons over .50 caliber: they were registered as destructive devices, but did not require a "machinegun" NFA stamp. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/25/2017 11:48:22 AM EDT
[#12]
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
