User Panel
Posted: 7/8/2015 2:02:21 PM EDT
I want a bolt action 22 and have narrowed it down to these two. Which one should I fo one and why
The Savage is much cheaper Just realized the one I want, fv-sr, is the same price as the American so I am leaning towards the Mark II... Is the american worth the extra 100 bucks I would prefer a gun with a bull barrel What model would you use ? Thanks in advanced guys |
|
[#1]
FVSR and without any hesitation. There are 5 between me and my friends and no regrets. Very accurate, reliable, and the accutrigger is acceptable.
You will need to get a stock pack so you can have the right height for a scoped rifle, unless you are replacing the stock. The stock pack I use has zippered compartment for storing extra mags as well. Depending on the height of your mount you may need extra shims. The stock really is the worst part of the rifle because the drop on it is for iron sights, which clearly this rifle does not have. This is the one I use. Triad Stock Pack Cons If you must have a butter smooth bolt you will not like the Savage. It feeds every time so it does not bother me. If you like to sling it and move around a lot in it the mag will drive you crazy cutting up your back and side. It seems every edge is sharp or pointed. I have taken a dremel to some and rigged up a neoprene sleeve as well. I rarely have mine on a sling so it was not a deal breaker for me. |
|
[#2]
I used to have the Savage FVSR. I now have a Ruger American Rimfire. I like the Ruger better. Fit and finish on the Ruger is better and the mag design is leaps and bounds ahead of the Savage. The Savage edges out the Ruger in the trigger department and MAY be a little more accurate, but I haven't shot the Ruger as much yet. The factory Ruger polymer stock is WAAAY better than the factory Savage polymer stock but you can get a Boyd's (great South Dakota company) for either.
|
|
[#4]
I have the following Savage rifles- two of the standard MK II's, two FVSR's and a Mk II BTVS. I also have a pair of the Ruger All Americans. The Savages shoot a little better but the Ruger is a much friendlier rifle to shoot...the Ruger magazines are superior and the general feel of the rifle is much better, the Savages feel cheap and clunky by comparison. I prefer the Rugers over the Savages.
|
|
[#5]
I've had both, and while the Savage is a nice rifle, the Ruger is a better buy. Most bought the Savage as a host because it was cheap, and there was almost nothing else available at the time. Now that Ruger has a threaded bolt gun, it's a simple choice. The Ruger is more refined, it's still inexpensive, and the magazine alone makes it a no brainer.
|
|
[#7]
Faced with the same choice, I bought the Savage, and was not disappointed.
|
|
[#8]
Quoted:
I want a bolt action 22 and have narrowed it down to these two. Which one should I fo one and why The Savage is much cheaper Just realized the one I want, fv-sr, is the same price as the American so I am leaning towards the Mark II... Is the american worth the extra 100 bucks I would prefer a gun with a bull barrel What model would you use ? Thanks in advanced guys View Quote Here are a couple of videos I did looking at the differences. They are both excellent choices, but very different guns. I try to show the differences and similarities. Hope this helps you decide which one is right for you. mbell556 https://youtu.be/kLNC2TVFMxk https://youtu.be/VsascbSRK20 |
|
[#9]
I just bought one of each. The Savage was much cheaper, considering the threaded muzzle. Don't care for the magazine, though.
Lgs had a sale on the Mark II for $224 yesterday, while it cost me $100 for the gunsmith to thread my RAR ($300 or so). |
|
[#10]
Quoted:
I just bought one of each. The Savage was much cheaper, considering the threaded muzzle. Don't care for the magazine, though. Lgs had a sale on the Mark II for $224 yesterday, while it cost me $100 for the gunsmith to thread my RAR ($300 or so). View Quote I got my RAR 8334, has a better bolt knob,threaded and, slightly thicker barrel for 270… so I think I did well But it definitely was a challenge to track down |
|
[#11]
Quoted:
Here are a couple of videos I did looking at the differences. They are both excellent choices, but very different guns. I try to show the differences and similarities. Hope this helps you decide which one is right for you. mbell556 https://youtu.be/kLNC2TVFMxk https://youtu.be/VsascbSRK20 View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I want a bolt action 22 and have narrowed it down to these two. Which one should I fo one and why The Savage is much cheaper Just realized the one I want, fv-sr, is the same price as the American so I am leaning towards the Mark II... Is the american worth the extra 100 bucks I would prefer a gun with a bull barrel What model would you use ? Thanks in advanced guys Here are a couple of videos I did looking at the differences. They are both excellent choices, but very different guns. I try to show the differences and similarities. Hope this helps you decide which one is right for you. mbell556 https://youtu.be/kLNC2TVFMxk https://youtu.be/VsascbSRK20 Thanks mbell, You videos are great, after watching them I chose the ruger for the stock and magazine The acuracy seemed very similar with the savage having a slight edge… close enough for me as this is my first bolt gun I'll eventually fall into the arfcom trap of "get both" and pick up a savage next year |
|
[#13]
|
|
[#14]
I went with the RAR Sports South Exclusive (model 8334) also.. Decent trigger, comes with a threaded barrel and I have a ton of 10/22 mags already.
|
|
[#16]
Can one of you confirm the threads on the RAR 8305/8306/8334 models are .400" long? I thought I read that somewhere but can't find it, and figured those that had them in hand could verify.
Thanks. |
|
[#17]
Quoted:
Can one of you confirm the threads on the RAR 8305/8306/8334 models are .400" long? I thought I read that somewhere but can't find it, and figured those that had them in hand could verify. Thanks. View Quote It should be .4 as ruger changed all there threads for 22 to .4 a year or so ago There is a guy in this thread that said his RAR is .4 http://www.rimfirecentral.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-552951.html Maybe someone can verify |
|
[#18]
I really don't see any contest here. Other than MAYBE a slight accuracy edge to the Savage I'd go Ruger. No need to change the stock. I can't believe Savage sells these with those stocks.
|
|
[#19]
Quoted:
Can one of you confirm the threads on the RAR 8305/8306/8334 models are .400" long? I thought I read that somewhere but can't find it, and figured those that had them in hand could verify. Thanks. View Quote Confirmed - mine is .4" long, unlike my slightly older 10/22 TD that has the .6" threads. Bob S. |
|
[#21]
|
|
[#22]
Hmm now that they make the Ruger with a threaded barrel I might end up buying that instead of a FV-SR. How good/bad are the stock sights on the Ruger? It's been 10 years since I shot a 10/22 and I don't remember much about it other than I didn't really care for it.
|
|
[#23]
Quoted:
Hmm now that they make the Ruger with a threaded barrel I might end up buying that instead of a FV-SR. How good/bad are the stock sights on the Ruger? It's been 10 years since I shot a 10/22 and I don't remember much about it other than I didn't really care for it. View Quote The Williams fiber optic front sight is pretty good. A little big but definitely usable. I prefer it over the stock front sight on the 10/22. The rear sight is the same as on the 10/22, but is adjustable for windage and elevation supposedly. |
|
[#24]
I bought the savage a while back in anticipation of running suppressed down the road. All this time it sits in the closet and then the Ruger comes out. I will be selling it and getting a ruger. My main reason is the mags but the overall feel and specifically the stock feel better to me on the ruger.
|
|
[#25]
|
|
[#26]
Quoted:
You can come pretty close price wise if you buy a unthreaded gun and have it threaded. It is tempting for sure but my cheap ass will probably just buy the 18" View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Does Ruger make the American with a 16" threaded barrel? You can come pretty close price wise if you buy a unthreaded gun and have it threaded. It is tempting for sure but my cheap ass will probably just buy the 18" I know... I just want to buy a gun ready to use for once. I customize just about every gun I own, a lot of them even before I fire a round. |
|
[#29]
Quoted:
Does Ruger make the American with a 16" threaded barrel? View Quote The threaded Ruger barrel is 18" but I was surprised that the velocities were slower in the longer barrel of the Ruger compared to the Savage. So if that is the concern it is not a problem. I does make it slightly less compact. https://youtu.be/kLNC2TVFMxk |
|
[#30]
Quoted:
The threaded Ruger barrel is 18" but I was surprised that the velocities were slower in the longer barrel of the Ruger compared to the Savage. So if that is the concern it is not a problem. I does make it slightly less compact. https://youtu.be/kLNC2TVFMxk View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Does Ruger make the American with a 16" threaded barrel? The threaded Ruger barrel is 18" but I was surprised that the velocities were slower in the longer barrel of the Ruger compared to the Savage. So if that is the concern it is not a problem. I does make it slightly less compact. https://youtu.be/kLNC2TVFMxk Yeah most 22 maxes out right in that 14-18" range. I just wanted 16" because it is more compact. |
|
[#31]
Quoted:
Yeah most 22 maxes out right in that 14-18" range. I just wanted 16" because it is more compact. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Does Ruger make the American with a 16" threaded barrel? The threaded Ruger barrel is 18" but I was surprised that the velocities were slower in the longer barrel of the Ruger compared to the Savage. So if that is the concern it is not a problem. I does make it slightly less compact. https://youtu.be/kLNC2TVFMxk Yeah most 22 maxes out right in that 14-18" range. I just wanted 16" because it is more compact. Me too... |
|
[#32]
Can the ruger be cut/threaded to 16" and still use the iron sights if the sights are relocated?
|
|
[#33]
|
|
[#34]
|
|
[#35]
Quoted:
But TBA does (and others). Integrally-suppressed... http://www.tbasuppressors.com/assets/images/blog/ruger22suppressor.png On the 77/22: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyLzm38vuOQ View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Does Ruger make the American with a 16" threaded barrel? No But TBA does (and others). Integrally-suppressed... http://www.tbasuppressors.com/assets/images/blog/ruger22suppressor.png On the 77/22: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyLzm38vuOQ That's pretty nifty. I never thought I'd want a integral but a dedicated gun is making more and more sense to me. |
|
[#37]
Quoted:
I have been looking at the GemTec Mistic... View Quote I have one in jail right now. I's going to be installed on a PWS T3 Summit receiver / trigger package that is on order. The T3 has a backlog of about 2-3 months right now. I shot a Mist on my SOT's personal 10-22. Extremely quite. Action noise is louder that the shot. Back on topic But I have a Savage MKII with factory laminated stock. Great trigger. I've had this around 4 or 5 years now. Back when I bought this, they didn't have factory threaded barrels. (Or I didn't know if they did) I had JP Grips in Pelican Rapids , Minnesota thread it for suppressor use. This rifle is a tack driver at 50yds or less. Normal ranges I use it at around the house for vermin control. . I know nothing about the RAR, but Ruger's magazine is a better choice over my Savage's. Picture of Savage to follow. |
|
[#38]
|
|
[#39]
|
|
[#40]
Quoted:
Here are a couple of videos I did looking at the differences. They are both excellent choices, but very different guns. I try to show the differences and similarities. Hope this helps you decide which one is right for you. mbell556 https://youtu.be/kLNC2TVFMxk https://youtu.be/VsascbSRK20 View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I want a bolt action 22 and have narrowed it down to these two. Which one should I fo one and why The Savage is much cheaper Just realized the one I want, fv-sr, is the same price as the American so I am leaning towards the Mark II... Is the american worth the extra 100 bucks I would prefer a gun with a bull barrel What model would you use ? Thanks in advanced guys Here are a couple of videos I did looking at the differences. They are both excellent choices, but very different guns. I try to show the differences and similarities. Hope this helps you decide which one is right for you. mbell556 https://youtu.be/kLNC2TVFMxk https://youtu.be/VsascbSRK20 mbell, I like your videos. Very informative and well done. I have had the Savage FV-SR for a couple of years and I am very happy with it. I do like the fluted barrel, the scope rail and the bolt handle. After watching your videos, showing the features of the Ruger, I like the stock and the 10/22 style magazine. I have a couple of 10/22's, so I already have a bunch of mags for them and I do like that I could use the same mags for the Ruger American. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.