I would have to disagree with your friend. The sig and M&P are about the same for accuracy (depending on ammo and shooter). I have found I need to clean my sig more than what the M&P is needed, especially when running a can. The firing pin hole gets gummed up in my sig resulting in light strikes. The M&P seems to have a little more robust strike and a little wider firing pin (square vs. round) that will go a little longer between cleanings.
Keep in mind I’m not talking about 50 or 100 rounds, when not running a can I can run a couple value packs through either with no issues. With the can you don’t see issues while shooting but will have gum up problems with both rifles if you don’t clean between sessions. It’s just hard to get around how filthy most .22 ammo is, especially with all the blow back from a can.
Both rifles have their strong points and it would be hard to recommend one over the other. The sig to me has better feel and weight than the M&P, but the M&P functions identical to an AR if you’re looking for a trainer.. both are accurate and reliable.