|
|
Posted: 6/25/2012 11:54:35 AM
THE IMAGE ABOVE IS A PAID ADVERTISEMENT I'll get pics up eventually, but the here's what it's marked: mid way down the barrel it's got winchester markings, and model 67-22 short long and long rifle. And a serial number with those punched numbers 014XX. But the weird markings are by the chamber. It says "M.192 1947" Right over the chamber on top of the barrel. Then on the left side of the chamber on the barrel, right where it meets the wood there are 3 very small markings. Two of them are right by each other and they have a crown over a letter. I think one of the letters is an E and the other has a P, but the one with the P has an X over it, sideways. Under the crown. And the the third is an oval with a P and some other lines in it. Is this strange? Or Govt' markings? I've never seen markings like this before. Do you think this thing is OK to fire? I can take it to a Gunsmith to make sure. It has a nice competition rear peep sight that is fully adjustable and easy to adjust. Plus it's drilled and tapped for a scope. I'm thinking it would be really neat to shoot, but I googled it and these things can be really old too. I'm afraid to try it. It's got a chrome bolt handle, which some websites were saying means it's old. I'll try and get pics up soon if it behooves someone to help me figure out if A, this is OK to shoot, or if it should just be a safe queen, and B, if these markings have any govt' significance. Which I doubt really makes it worth anything, but I'm curious as to what it means. Thank you all! |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/26/2012 8:24:39 AM
At one time the rifle was in Europe.
They frequently require a firearm to be "re-proofed". |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/26/2012 11:22:55 AM
[Last Edit: 6/26/2012 11:28:02 AM by JJREA]
Aaaaaah! Thank you. Someone else said on another website the British Govt' used these for training during WWII. I think mine is old enough for that to be the case, but not sure. Are these worth anything do you know?
I would just like to shoot it and enjoy it. From what I can tell, they're really not worth a whole lot of money anywhere. But I've heard some say they can go as high as 5 bills. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/26/2012 6:12:26 PM
Hows the bore look? Those were good shooting little rifles. That should be a 67A with that stock, the standard 67 had finger grooves in the forearm, its probably an early A since its not marked as such. They had a lot of problems with the forearms spliting on the finger groove model so they came out with that stock.
A military collector maybe interested in it, other then that I dont think it would bring more then a couple hundred to the average buyer. To the right collector it would bring more. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/26/2012 6:18:07 PM
It shows a Parker-Hale receiver sight which the Brits seem to have loved. I have seen many Mossberg 22's that were part of the Lend/Lease program during WWII return with British proof marking and P-H sights like yours.
I don't think the 67's were part of the Lend/Lease Program, but England did buy many 22's for use as trainers, this could be one of those that found it's way back home. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/26/2012 6:22:51 PM
[Last Edit: 6/26/2012 6:24:05 PM by Phoenix_III]
*edit* Sent a PM instead.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2012 12:44:10 PM
PhoenixIII, I just deleted a message in my inbox to make room. I didn't get yours. Maybe it didn't let it go through. It wasn't full, but maybe too full to accept another.
Anyways, thanks for the tips guys. Let me see if I can get a view of the bore.... The bore looks great, although to my untrained eye, it looks like the lands and grooves may be worn some. Maybe not as sharp and deep as they once were. IDK. But it's smooth and clean. I do see one imperfection or dimple about half way down. Nothing horrible though. My Dad's Garand looks like a sewer pipe, even after cleaning it liberally and it still shot well though. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/7/2012 8:55:31 PM
I love my 67, very accurate rifle. What a neat set of sights, how is that rear sight mounted?
|
|
|