Quote History Quoted:
For a year and a half or so I was training every week. For a while I had the same setup and same issues; I changed pretty quickly. I now run my pistol mags forward of the rifle mags, which are at 9 o'clock. Works a lot better.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History Quoted:
Quoted:
I took a AK class recently. Two guys were using a pistol taco stacked on a rifle mag. Both of the pulled the wrong mag several times. I assume you could work around that with training. I personally would skip that setup.
For a year and a half or so I was training every week. For a while I had the same setup and same issues; I changed pretty quickly. I now run my pistol mags forward of the rifle mags, which are at 9 o'clock. Works a lot better.
The number of people who report that having double-thick pistol over rifle mags is considerable. However, the number of people who have no problems with such a rig is unknown, as they seldom post that all is well.
Personally, I find it slightly confusing, and I do NOT need confusion in stressful moments. YMMV.
I think that belts set up for gaming are one thing, and belts set up for tactical use probably will be a bit different. I don't mean to imply that there is anything wrong with gaming, except that the rules of the game can be one thing, and the rules enforced by reality (IOW, tactical situations) can be in conflict.
The problem occurs when the gamer uses his tactical belt (or vice versa), and the differences between the two come into play.
Take just one example: The gamer might choose to use open-topped pouches, while the tactical person might choose to use full-flapped pouches. Both make sense in their respective environments, but there is a definite user-perceived difference in using one or the other. Another: The gamer need not be concerned how his belt interfaces with other gear, such as a pack, plate carrier, or both. the tactical user has to consider these things.