 Switchh 
Member
Joined: Aug 2009  ME, USA
 Posts: 2696 Feedback: 100% (7) |
Posted: 7/26/2012 6:27:21 PM
THE IMAGE ABOVE IS A PAID ADVERTISEMENT I would be getting a cheaper (heavier) ceramic plate, and it would be ~8 lbs. If I used just this in the front, how much of an issue would I run into? |
|
|
|
NapeSticksToKids
Slick Nuts
Team Member
Joined: Sep 2005 OH, USA
Posts: 6559 Feedback: 100% (81) Link To This Post |
Posted: 7/26/2012 6:29:39 PM
In a vest like the interceptor, I would say you would still have an imbalance issue but not as bad as with a plate carrier. Remember you have the weight of the plate in front plus your ammo. If you carry hydration on back it may help.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2012 10:21:35 PM
There is one plate carrier that I know of that is specifically designed from the ground up to carry just a front plate.
US Palm DTPC |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2012 10:59:36 PM
Per Blackhawk down, (paraphrased), "You won't need a rear plate unless you are running away"...murphy can be a bitch at times.
Paladin |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/27/2012 8:41:54 PM
Originally Posted By PALADIN-hgwt:
Per Blackhawk down, (paraphrased), "You won't need a rear plate unless you are running away"...murphy can be a bitch at times. Paladin Yep. We all know how well that worked out for him too. (no disrespect meant, but I'd rather have two for balance and extra security) |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2012 11:22:23 AM
My dad's unit was only issued one plate in Iraq during 03. He said they mostly put it in the back because they figured they could shoot someone who was in front of them where they were usually looking. You can't see people pop up behind you. Also as mentioned the ammo in front would off set the weight a bit.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2012 12:01:58 PM
This.
Thus why they were called back savers. |
|
|
ARCHIVED
